I mean like:

  • Chinese (Edit: Mandarin Chinese) will become the lingua franca of the world
  • The Internation Aviation Language will (probably) become Chinese (replacing Aviation English)
  • Lunar New year becomes a popular holiday (like Chrismas is currently popular worldwide)
  • The Internet will use mostly Chinese Chracter
  • And instead of 26 Latin based characters, you’ll have to learn thousands of characters, imagine that 😅 (or just use a translator tool 🤷‍♂️)
  • There would be a China version of Hollywood, taking over the original Hollywood
  • Fengshui becomes a thing that the world starts to care about
  • UN Headquarters now located in Shanghai (I’m guessing this is the most “international” city in China, right?)
  • Boeing is dead, some Chinese airplane manufacturer now dominates, competing with Airbus.
  • Baidu is default search engine (now with less censorship due to democrarization)
  • Harmony OS (Huawei’s Android fork) become the new “Apple”, iPhone is now insignificant, ranking below Motorola in terms of market share.
  • Either Windows get brought by some Chinese Bussiness person, or there China makes a Linux distribution that starts off as Open Source with some proprietary components (like how Android is), then eventually becoming Closed Source once they overtake Windows. Lets call it PandaOS (I’m not creative with names 'mmkay)
  • etc…

Sounds like an interesting world 🤔

What do you think?

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’d be too worried about the CCP backsliding, but if it theoritycally collapsed, and the ROC swooped in to take its place, then yeah I’d be fine with it. Better than Trump’s america

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Me being OK with a specific nation as superpower had zero impact on weather or not that nation becomes a superpower or not.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I think your premise - If China becomes democratic - is a really, really big IF.

    But hey if they can show us a better way and use their resources to help the world, go nuts. A true 1:1 democracy would be fascinating to see implemented.

  • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    When you refer to becoming democratic, you mean like how it has been until a couple of years ago? Or, are you referring to China suddenly becoming Capitalist instead of Communist?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Is hexbear leaking or something?

    Yeah, no, the Chinese government should not be in charge of China, less so of the world.

    I don’t want to have a camera tracking my every movement and lose social points every time I make a misstep. I don’t want to just disappear when I say something the government doesn’t agree with.

    Having said that, Fuck pooh bear

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I specifically said “If China becomes democratic”… 🙄

      I guess all the downvotes is from people that somehow missed it… 🤦‍♂️

      (And yes, fuck lemmygrad, fuck hexbear, fuck CCP, dictatorship is bad regardless of country)

  • boiledham@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Not really, the same issues that plague the world right now will still exist, just stemming from a different entity

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Linguistically, I want neither English but Chinese, but an auxiliary language to be the lingua franca. I already know Esperanto, so this would be a good candidate as far as I’m concerned. There’s no way I’m learning Chinese.

    I want to see as much nonfree closed source software replaced by FOSS as possible, no matter who makes it.

    The others (pop culture, companies) wouldn’t bother me much at all. But I don’t think Christmas would stop being popular at least in Europe.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    This reads more like “do you care if Chinese culture becomes popular and dominant” and I am not sure. Except for the language (which I don’t think I could learn before I die) I don’t care, the music is good, movies, dance. And China and India are both so populous it would make logical sense to me that one might be the trend-setting culture.

    But politically I think it more likely that the US finds its way back to democracy, than China finding its way there.

  • guy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t care which country is the global super power as long as it adhere to the liberal world order and all that comes with it.
    I want to leave in peace, enjoy my human rights and not have to worry about other countries using arms to push their will.

    But also: a lot of those points have nothing to do with who the global super power is

    Appendix: maybe I was vague but my answer is that as long as the super power follows the rule-based order (as it is supposed to be obviously) it doesn’t matter who that super power is. China, Russia, USA, Albania, the Vatican, Congo, w/e.
    Understand that might does not make right and follow the same rules as the lesser states and I’m happy.

    • novibe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hummm the “liberal world order” is 100% “countries” using arms to push their will. Countries being “the west”.

      And YOU having “human rights” is not really dependent on the “liberal world order”. Most of your rights were won by blood and tears during the late 1800s and early 1900s, through popular movements mostly ideologically aligned first with anarchism then with communism.

      Also, the vast majority of the world not having human rights and being colonized and exploited IS your “liberal world order”.

      So not really sure how you specifically benefit from western imperialism, unless you are a billionaire ofc. Which I highly doubt.

      • guy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        adhere to the liberal world order

        And YOU having “human rights” is not really dependent on the “liberal world order”. Most of your rights were won by blood and tears during the late 1800s and early 1900s, through popular movements mostly ideologically aligned first with anarchism then with communism.

        You are correct in that the liberal world order is an effect of previous hardwon freedoms. What is your point? The LIO makes sure that if my government tries to take these freedoms from me it invokes international support. So a malicious government will not only have to deal with domestic pushback, but international as well.

        Also, the vast majority of the world not having human rights and being colonized and exploited IS your “liberal world order”.

        …which is why these countries are under sanctions for example. Take Venezuela as a case. But yes, the postcolonial debate is ongoing.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      But also: a lot of those points have nothing to do with who the global super power is

      I mean, Americanization of the world was helped by the fact that US became a global superpower.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Global Superpower

      Like pervasive American influence into everything. Military bases everywhere. Hollywood everywhere. Internet is mostly American sites with American users, taking about American politics. But replace all that with China.

      • Loss@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        China is already like that, just outside the West. Even in the West you’re not going to find a single person that doesn’t have a bit of Chinese goods and/or culture in their daily life.

  • jumjummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Depends on whether or not China shifts demographically as well. They’re currently too xenophobic and monocultural. Look at most western developed country and you’ll see quite a bit of diversity. I don’t think you’ll ever have a global superpower that is so set on race or where you were born.

    China is definitely not immigration friendly.

    • novibe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      China is not easy to immigrate to, true. But saying they are monocultures or xenophobic is CRAZY.

      China has way more peoples and cultures than most countries. It has waaaay more languages officially spoken and taught in school than the US. It’s more comparable to the EU, if it had formed like a thousand years earlier.

      Just search a couple of random Chinese provinces or autonomous regions (places where minorities self-govern 😲) in like the north and the south, or the west and the east, and read on the culture and ethnicities there.

      Seriously Americans insist they have such vast cultural differences within the US, because “here we say pop and there they say soda; most people here are anabaptist, but there they are Methodists”.

      Bro in China they speak languages that are not even related. They follow religions that are separated by thousands of years. They have cultural practices that are unique to their region that developed for thousands and thousands of years.

      China is infinitely more diverse than 90% of countries in the world.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wouldn’t have a problem with any actually democratic country being a superpower since I’ve always lived in a democratic superpower. Though it’s flawed and not the greatest, it sure as Hell would beat growing up in an authoritarian superpower.

    As for the things listed, I wouldn’t mind the whole Chinese becoming the defacto world language considering I could probably learn it and if not, translation tools are better than ever before in most cases. I wouldn’t mind Chinese Hollywood so long as they were making quality animated films (which is way more than possible for them currently, just look at films like Legend of Hei and Big Fish and Begonia). Fengshui as a spiritual practice I can’t get behind personally, but have no problems with.

    Got no complaints about where UN headquarters would be moved to in this hypothetical so long as it’s not an authoritarian country. I don’t mind Lunar New Year becoming a major holiday since it’s fairly harmless as a concept (just don’t go blowing yourself up with firecrackers somehow). So long as the safety and privacy measures are roughly the same and I’m not being uber spied on, don’t really care who has control of business manufacturing, no authoritarian country though.

    Knowing Baidu, without the government requirement to censor, they’d become the new gøøgle in this hypothetical world, so you wouldn’t catch me directly using it. Don’t have enough info on harmony to make a statement about it since I usually just use budget samsun phones with their android tweaks. As for windows/Linux, there are already whole entire Linux distros (like Deepin) that may be forks of one of the big distros but are their own thing. But knowing me, I’d still stick with whatever Linux I am using at the time, so little to no impact for me there.

    All in all, I don’t have a problem in this hypothetical. But that’s something we’re pretty far away from ever becoming a reality, though.

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      since I’ve always lived in a democratic superpower. Though it’s flawed and not the greatest, it sure as Hell would beat growing up in an authoritarian superpower.

      Hold onto that thought for the next four years. I suspect this statement is going to age like milk before the next “election”.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You are wildly overestimating what “democratic” means.

    Or maybe you mean more, but the term “democratic” does not contain that. Think about Russia, India, Philippines… they are democratic too, but that has very different meanings there.

    So, before I am OK with China, they would also need many other major changes besides a democracy.