• randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    If they won’t take them, maybe we could put all these Columbians in some sort of District. A District of Columbia filled with criminals. Wait, we already have that.

  • Krik@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    You missed the point where the people were cuffed the whole flight, were dehydrated and transported in military planes like cattle. That’s why those planes were rejected.

    The president send his own jet to get these people back because they are people not cattle.

    • skye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      So he saw these people were transported like cattle, dehydrated and mistreated, and instead of letting them get off the planes, he’s sent them back in those same planes so he can retrieve them with normal planes?

      Unless I am missing something, I feel like you’d want those people to not fly in a plane like that again.

      Either the plane didn’t take off in the first place, case in which rejecting it would make sense.

      Or those planes landed in Colombia, then sent back so they can be brought in proper planes, extending the suffering for no reason.

      • Krik@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        The planes (there were two) landed in Brasil. I don’t know if that’s where they came from in the first place.

        A note: Usually these people are brought back using normal commercial flights. Only this time they used military planes.

        • skye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          I see. I thought they landed in Colombia but were sent back to the U.S.

          Thank you for the clarification

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      His base see it as him punishing Columbia and they’ll later be surprised at how much some things cost and blame liberals for it.

      • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re behind the news. Colombia caved within minutes. No tariffs. The idea was to push them to take their citizens back, and it worked.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Once again the orange toddler throws a tantrum and gets his way.

          His cult is right about one thing - he gets shit done. It’s horrible shit, but he gets it done.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            If you count spreading shit all over the walls getting stuff done then sure. Personally, I think he is just making a smelly mess.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Right now it seems he’s getting anything he wants. (gestures at OP) I hope there’s an end to that, but until then, yeah, I must angrily conclude, dude gets shit done. (Using the most reprehensible methods, and with shitty outcomes, but that’s what his base voted for, so I’m quite sure they have few complaints right now.)

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                And I will keep pointing out that getting shit done is not fucking shit up and making things worse. That is just making a shitty mess.

                I don’t care for the opinions of his supporters mainly because they have no real opinions. One Trumper I ran into today said good thing Drump is a making Federal workers go back to work because they are waiting on their SSD determination.

                You can’t make this level of brain dead up.

        • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          It was never about not accepting them. It was about them being treated with human dignity on the way there.

  • sunglocto@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Seems like Trump’s strategy is to now bully countries into getting what they want. "I want them out!!! I want Canada!!! I want Greenland!!!

    He’s basically the equivalent of the kid that flips over the monopoly table when someone bought a property before him.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “Criminals they forced into the United States” = “Invasion”

    “Repatriation” != “Deportation”

    Repatriation is what happens when you return a POW to their country of origin. Deportation is when you return a criminal to their country of origin.

    POWs are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system. They can be held indefinitely without charges, or returned to their country of origin, without judicial oversight. Since deportation is a judicial process, POWs are not subject to deportation.

    POWs are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of US law; Trump is arguing that the children of “invader-immigrants” can’t be citizens.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      POWs are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system.

      That’s… Not true.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        POWs do not need to be charged with a crime. Indeed, under international treaties and laws governing armed conflict, POWs generally can’t be criminally charged for simply participating in hostilities.

        They can be held without charge until the conclusion of hostilities. They are not entitled to the protections afforded to the accused, because they are not accused. They are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system.

        By describing them as “invaders”, he is suggesting that immigrants be treated as enemy combatants.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Trump wouldn’t recognize hypocrisy if it walked up and kicked him in the balls.

      • dx1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Norman Finkelstein said something the other day, quoting someone else…it was…“hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue”. Meaning, evil people understand what they’re doing is wrong, that’s why they pretend to be good. Hypocrisy is beyond the point to them. They’ve sacrificed morality. Although I think Finkelstein was saying it in the context of talking about how Republican pols do so much less of even pretending to be good (though certainly not zero).

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t think Finkelstein’s quote takes into account a severe narcissist.

          In the narcissistic mind, the only right is something that benefits them, and the only wrong is something that harms them.

          • dx1@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Well, the proof’s in the pudding - examine the evidence on this point, does he pretend to be something he’s not, better than what he is?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Ironically, so does your comment. You mean actively and forcibly ejecting refugees.

      The economic vs. refugee character of the people he ejected is unclear AFAIK, though.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Oh, negative morally.

          How does it do that? These were Colombian citizens being moved unwillingly, not refugees.

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Saying the president is already unpopular and now he won’t take these people makes it sound like taking refugees would boost his popularity

            Trump however by doing this shows he thinks taking refugees is a bad thing

            Forcibly relocating refugees doesn’t make them no longer refugees, it just makes you (the one relocating them) a bad person/in violation of international law

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Look, I know that immigration is a contentious issue, but sanctioning a country for not repatriating its citizens is a disproportionate response. Trump and Co. are really obsessed with immigration to even do this. It says a lot what values they have.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Are those people really Columbian citizens? I would not put it past Trump to just command ICE to land the next plane full of “somehow latin looking people” somewhere south of the border.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, I just saw the news that Colombia gave in.

        Trump is going all in. He’s reverting to the 19th century way of strong arming other countries over petty things. He’s reviving the old-school capitalist imperialism.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      He does that to strongarm companies into complying, because it works. It’s also setting an example for other countries to cooperate.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I suppose, but we’re talking about international diplomacy. And a modern one at that.

        Trump’s strong arming sounds so 19th century. His open threat of taking Panama canal, Canada, Greenland, and renaming the Gulf of Mexico is so manifest destiny.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Trump’s strong arming sounds so 19th century though

          20th century too! If a government didn’t do what we wanted them to do, we just couped their government, and installed a dictator.

          I mean, how do you think Sadaam Hussein got into power?

  • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe the US should take back the US members of ISIS that have been left (along with the people from the other nations that joined ISIS) for the Kurds to keep.

    • reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well you see, we have long and storied history of fucking over the Kurds. You wouldn’t want to tarnish that record would you?

  • sirpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    Getting married to a Colombian woman as an America. Is this going to hinder her from getting a marriage visa and coming to America with me?

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It would be a good idea that Mexico, Columbia and other latin countries promote the Trump Wall, but expelling all US residents in their countries. A wall always works in both directions.