• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle




  • Votes are federated. They are tied to account names. Only your instance can tie them to your IP.

    DMs are insecure in that admin instances can read them. Most instances tell you not to use them.

    Scraping is more resource intensive than using an API to have data submitted to you. Since you are now offering a service you can set terms on what you can legally do with that data while scraping can lead to legal issues. PR issues as well.

    In general using a corporate social media will allow companies to track you (or buy the tracking data from the social media company) far more thoroughly than scraping lemmy.


  • Given new commercial entrants into the Fediverse such as WordPress, Tumblr and Threads, we suggest collaboration among these parties to help bring the trust and safety benefits currently enjoyed by centralized platforms to the wider Fediverse ecosystem

    In such a system, the server on which a post originates would submit imagery to PhotoDNA for analysis

    This same technique could also be applied to other hosted media analysis mechanisms (e.g. Google’s SafeSearch or Microsoft’s Analyze Image API40

    While large social media providers utilize signals such as browser User-Agent, TLS fingerprint,8 IP and many other mechanisms to determine whether a previously suspended bad actor is attempting to re-create an account, Mastodon admins have little to work with apart from a user’s IP and e-mail address, both of which are easily fungible.

    So basically people might have joined the fediverse in large due to privacy reasons but if fediverse is to be “ethical” it should share your images with big tech as well as track you better.

    He also laments Tor and E2E messaging.







  • Look, if France can cockblock many other countries because they’ll lose a little bit of money in the process while lying about it saying it’s because of “environmental issues” when really it’s just protectionism on their part, hurting relations between Europe and South America and preventing other countries in Europe from benefiting from that… that is a centralised form of power. The decision becomes theirs because it has to be unanimous. It’s also anti-democratic

    Sounds convincing if you ignore veto not being a France power. It can be literally be used by any country in the EU. Unanimity is the opposite of centralization. Plain majority democracy is more centralized than unanimity.

    I’m from the Schengen area… and I’ll still be against joining the EU, because EU regulations shows its more than just an economic union. Laws have to be changed and liberalism has to be turned up to 11, borders have to be opened completely and laws have to be changed, costing lots and lots of money and time, as well as taking away sovereignty by taking away autonomy.

    Did you have to do much research? The treaties say that members states surrender competencies to the EU. The 00s treaties say it out loud that the EU is not just an economic organization. You didn’t discover any secret nor are you blowing anyone’s mind with your revelations.

    I also do not like how liberal the EU is but you probably think liberal means left wing.

    “But you can leave”… worked really well for the Brits, didn’t it? Again: no thanks.

    I didn’t say that to convince you to join. I said that because that’s not possible in federal states such as the US or Russia.

    I wish the EU would stop sharing Schengen with non members as well as stop having EEA members. These kind of agreements require alignment with EU law without EU representation thus eventually leading to bad relations.


  • The EU is not a federal state like the US or China or Russia. It’s a federation of sovereign states. Truly sovereign and de independent states not de jure like US states or Wales etc.

    They can even leave if they want.

    I also don’t understand how you can be against centralization of power and yet be against the veto, the best tool against centralization.

    You don’t have to join. Where are you from anyways?



  • There should at least be a path to a more democratic vote, where each country gets a certain amount of votes to equalise each other out.

    Like the European parliament? The reason for the veto is because the EU is not a country nor are it’s people a single nation.

    Smaller nations would not joined if it meant everything would get decided by a few large countries.

    So that France can stop our trade deals? No thanks. We’d rather pay for priveliges than do that.

    France usually doesn’t need the veto. They are big population wise and have a lot of influence being rich.

    So we won’t join, and the UK won’t come back.

    I don’t know who are you speaking for but it’s ok, if you don’t like the terms you don’t have to join. Just like it’s not fair to change the terms on those that have already joined.

    Same for the UK. They caused enough drama all these years.





  • This post is on a beehaw community. Started by a lemmy.world user. As I understand it is on our local copy of the community that got pulled before the de-federation and only our users should be able to post on it.

    Already that would be bad in my opinion since the copy is unmoderated and isolated. However it appears that some users replying are actually from other instances (not beehaw of course). This can only create confusion and further ‘issues’ with beehaw.