Summary

Rightwing groups across the US are driving a wave of legislation to restrict books in school and public libraries, targeting content deemed “sexually explicit” or “obscene,” often affecting LGBTQ+ and race-related titles.

Texas leads with 31 bills and 538 book bans in the 2023–24 school year.

Proposed laws, like Texas Senate Bill 13, shift book selection power from librarians to parent-led advisory boards.

Critics, including librarians and legal scholars, warn these efforts amount to censorship, risk violating First Amendment rights, and reduce access in underserved communities.

  • turnip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Are these the ones with blowjobs and things?

    Is it not considered pornographic, and if not where do we draw the line, is anything with LGBT in the title fair game?

  • TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Why do they care so much about libraries. it’s not like they or their kids read. How do you get illiterate people excited to ban books. It’s a god damn conspiracy!

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Libraries are stores of knowledge. Can’t have that. Educated people aren’t as easy to manipulate.

  • Puzzlehead@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Right wings lie bout wanting freedom of speech. They just want to sprout racist stuff and other phobic stuff. They treat LGBT like it’s a fetish.

  • drascus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    only one thing for it. Put as much indecent material in the library as possible. Also I used to work at a library and every now and then this like 80 year old dude would come in and say “show me where your dirty books are!” that guy was awesome.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Bu-but the right wingers promised me that I could say the hard-R N-word yet again, and if people were to call me ‘racist’ for it they’d be jailed for defamation, and they’d also jail feminist video game critics for censoring games!”

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Surely the free speech absolutists will be staunchly opposed. Why, if they weren’t, one could think it was never about free speech and always just about hate…

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The “free speech absolutists” just wanted to call black people the N-word, they don’t actually care about the rest.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        The “free speech absolutists” just wanted to call black people the N-word,

        They are able to say it already (and they still do amongst themselves).

        What they wanted is to be able to say it in public without consequences.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’d call it “wasting tax money perpetuating culture wars as a distraction from the class war; while also making the population dumber, and less inclined to resist feudalism.”

  • pzzzt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Please support your local library. Even if you just get a card and keep it active, it helps with stats that they use to get more funding.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I heard there’s one book in there that talks about a pair of sisters who get their father drunk so they can take turns raping him. Are they banning that one?

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’ve yet to discover a conservative “Christian” that possesses even a passing familiarity with their own self proclaimed testaments.

      Like seriously, you claim to take your belief seriously, it’s 1 fucking book! It’s not a page turner I grant them, but it’s ONE book.

    • pzzzt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately there’s a website that tells them specific books and passages to challenge.

    • PointyReality@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No no, they love free speech when it allows them to use hate speech against others. They only hate free speech when others opinions disagrees with their own. That is the difference between left and right, left understand that free speech means we have to protect against hate speech, the right rails against censorship regarding hate speech as a vehicle against “oppression” so they can be the ones that can attack those that disagree with them with hate speech.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The Constitution according to Republicans:

      We The People…words words GET TO HAVE AS MANY GUNS AS WE WANT words words…The End.