• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    I want to nitpick the definition of “waste” for a moment. Yes, you are using a lot of water, and energy if the water is heated, BUT if you’re getting something remotely positive out of it (and you’re paying for it), then I would not consider it wasteful. If you genuinely want to label it as something, then let’s compromise and call it therapeutic. Deal?

    • kubica@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      I’d like to see it that way, but fresh water scarcity is a growing problem in many areas.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        I have to wonder how much impact people taking 30-minute showers would have compared to corporate [mis]use.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        29 days ago

        Then we should take it from companies that use it to cool AI super computers, mass surveillance networks, grow the worst water to plant ratio crops possible.

        You could take a shower for 4 hours and it wouldn’t make a dent to the misuse by corporations.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      29 days ago

      This is Lemmy, if you use water to water a plant, it never goes anywhere, it disappears entirely and there is no wider system that the water might become a part of, and if you eat an almond you’ve literally used all the water a city would use in a year.