Since we’re using El Salvador like it’s a new Gitmo. Like yes, it would still suck for the people from El Salvador.

But at least people from other countries would go back to their home country. Presumably to be treated far better than El Salvador.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      We could easily, and should, implement a law saying that people must be deported back to their own country. It just means fewer people would be deported.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Do you remember how prisoners were kept in Guantanamo Bay, even after they were no longer suspected of any wrongdoing, simply because there wasn’t a country that would both accept them and treat them in accordance with US law? Many of those prisoners ended up nowhere near where they came from.

    Some countries refuse to accept deportees. Some countries are so likely to mistreat deportees that sending them to those countries is illegal. Some countries simply don’t exist anymore.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The fucking thought that Americans feel superior enough to not allow another country to take them…in this case from their extra judicial torture black site.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The point being that the US would see fit to refuse to return someone to a particular country all the while torturing them in the same black site.

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I mean, ignoring the law is this administration’s whole thing, so it wouldn’t matter. Also, as we’ve seen in the UK as well as the US, many targetted individuals have never even been to “their own country”.

  • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Because both Houses of Congress are controlled by Republicans who are 100% in support of everything the regime is doing.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I bet the general answer from congress would be “Why? It’s not our country’s problem where they end up once out of here”

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Because our laws only protect the wealthy, enforce racism, sexism and are getting worse and more genocidal in real time

  • Lembot_0002@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because Congress doesn’t care about the well-being of those people. Why else would this nuance be inserted into the law?

  • Archangel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Congress recently passed a law that allows people to be deported without due process. They’re not trying to stop him…they’re actively helping him.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know what the US congress is any more, but in other countries it’s because they really really want to expel someone and the deportee’s home country might say “no thanks, they’re your problem”.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      In case of the US they’ll ask “Oh? You reject him? You and what army?

      You can’t really deny the US much, y’know.

      • spittingimage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Afganistan said no when the US wanted Bin Laden. Two and a half trillion dollars later the exact same people are back in charge and now they’re armed with modern American weapons instead of vintage Soviet ones. Everyone lost except the people who said no to the US.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Because people facing deportation aren’t billionaire campaign donors, so the law doesn’t work for them

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mainly because the law is working as intended. Also because you would have to define what “their own country” is. Think of DACA recipients, who in many cases don’t even speak the language of the place where they were born, have no cultural or family connections back there, is that “their own country” if the are more USian than anything? What tablet the opposite? naturalized Citizens who very much retain the cultural and heritage connections, at times even creating separate cultural enclaves.

    It is almost as if “your own country” is a made up racist concept that gets wielded by power structures to keep people at each other’s throats.