You must log in or register to comment.
Define “define”.
That was the dumbest thing I have read today…
Define powerhouse
I like a lot of JPs stuff l. He intruduced me to a lot of concepts but ironically i must warn that his content really is for the thinking man in the sense that you need to stay vigilant to spot the cintradictions with reality. Cleaning your room doesnt fix dating or the job market for instance and sometimes those realities that go beyond our own self discipline and talent really are overwhelming.
Stonksface: thinc
How to order a hamburger that’s mostly spit
Juicy
As if they aren’t already.
They don’t have the time or hydration to do that to every order. They have to save that for the special customers.
Unrealistic. This is way too coherent. Needs more word salad.
Everything I hate is cultural marxism.
Sir… this is a Wendy’s
McDonalds marketing is getting pretty aggressive if they’re sending their cashiers to Wendy’s…
The cashier is working undercover in order to steal the krappy patty’s secret formula.
“What did you find out, Steve? Did you get the formula?”
“Yeah, commercials, we just need more than the other guys. I don’t think our food matters, like, at all.”
He is a racist and a bigot
Jordan Peterson is a charlatan
So… A good candidate for the next US president?
He’s Canadian.
That didn’t stop Ted Cruz from running a few years back
TIL. Goddamn it Alberta.
So is that worse?
deleted by creator
This is only missing JP coming up with a completely deranged definition of what fries are that he demands the cashier adheres to (I don’t think the vodka applies, that’s more making fun of the cashier). And also him entirely dodging the question of whether he likes fries, stating that people have discussed whether he likes fries but he refuses to reveal it.
Obviously fries represent the western civilization. Frying oil is the chaos dragon of woke left that means to destroy the fries, but will instead transform them into something even more beautiful, an entity of culinary perfection. But you would already know that if only you had bought my online course. sob It’s so sublime. sob
Employee listening in the background hears the timer for the fries go off. Pulls the basket out from the oil.
Looks at the fries.
Looks at the stand for them to drain.
Looks at Jordan Peterson.
Looks at the fries.
Shoves their own face into the hot oil to escape the sound of JP’s voice.
Great. Make your own version and post it. I’d love to see it.
Sealioning (source) + whataboutism. A very cheap method of trolling and exhausting the opponent of the argument which relies on the victim being unaware of sealioning and they’re being sealioned. It’s frustrating seeing JP fans think this is proof he’s a genius. it’s like Ben Shapiro, another rightwing “influencer” who constantly speaks fast and gish gallops on purpose and his fans think he’s a genius for that too
Don’t forget the constant motte and bailey.
That, too. For people who don’t know what that is (source)
The motte-and-bailey fallacy (named after the motte-and-bailey castle) is a form of argument and an informal fallacy where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities: one modest and easy to defend (the “motte”) and one much more controversial and harder to defend (the “bailey”).[1] The arguer advances the controversial position, but when challenged, insists that only the more modest position is being advanced.[2][3] Upon retreating to the motte, the arguer may claim that the bailey has not been refuted (because the critic refused to attack the motte)[1] or that the critic is unreasonable (by equating an attack on the bailey with an attack on the motte).[4]
Thanks for teaching me something new!
Also your username is very apt for this thread.
Tankie “intelligencia” power houses use this as well.
False inductive reasoning combined with butwhataboutism and sealinoning. All designed to exhaust the opponent and muddy the argument. Conservatives love this form of argument.
Analyzing the conversation does not the joke get.
Yeah, I got the joke. I was talking about the inspiration for the joke that made it funny in the first place.
Dragging your opponent into the weeds does not a good argument make
Thanks Yoda
You i thank
Currently watching a Peterson debate… This is just too perfect.
My dog is an intellectual powerhouse compared to Jordan Peterson fans.
Lol. I just Googled him and his YouTube channel description reads…
“Join intellectual phenomenon Dr. Jordan B. Peterson for enlightening discourse”
It’s a phenomenon how much he lacks any intellectual capabilities.
with the amount of benzos he took, and coma that gave him brain damage, hes been reduced to only able to respond with emotional outbursts.
Watching him debate those atheists was painful. His debating technique is beyond stupid.
- Make a statement that is at best wildly controversial and at worst blatantly untrue
- Redefine the words in that statement to make it vacuously true and completely uninteresting
- When challenged, say that you don’t care about common parlance
- Everyone loses, because this debate is now pointless and annoying
Yeah I watched the Some More News breakdown and it was certainly something lol
