• bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Don’t remember the last time the Democrats had military storming our streets and black bagging US residents en masse and deporting them to war zones like South Sudan or Libya despite those people having zero ties to those countries.

    This reeks of fucking shitpost right-wing propaganda.

    Edit: here come all the “but the US/CIA did all this fucked up stuff to other countries under Dems, too!”

    JFC, the current “president” who is GOP literally yells about wanting to deport/arrest political opponents, censor TV personalities (e.g. Colbert, Fallon, etc), openly calls to suppress political opposition in voting, openly supports ignoring the courts when they interfere with his blatantly unconstitutional actions, etc etc .

    Yes, the Dems aren’t fucking innocent, but to pretend they’re the same as a party that’s openly trying to “take back the Nazi word” is fucking insane.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      13 days ago

      war zones like South Sudan or Libya despite those people having zero ties to those countries.

      Damn I wonder why Libya is like that!

      You absolute ghouls literally don’t see foreigners as human

      • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        I dont think there is a lib alive who remembers the dems role in the destruction of Libya other than those directly involved in it.

      • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        since the end of ww2 the two major coup d’états in brazil happened with direct support of the department of state and the cia under dem administration (johnson was in power in 64 and obama, with hillary clinton in charge of the department of state, in 2016). we’ve got a story or two to tell about them. if the regular lib doesn’t care about that, then the most natural thing for us is to consider both parties equally harmful and don’t give a damn over internal issues of the us and a.

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Off the top off my head the national guard during the george floyd protest that got called in by tim walz. Even trump was “impressed”

          • bassomitron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            People had literally burned down police stations and mass looting was occurring. Their police force was completely overrun. Don’t act like it was remotely the same thing.

            I have several friends in Minneapolis that are very progressive. There were tons of people who were legit scared during periods of that for numerous reasons. It wasn’t “acceptable,” but what the fuck else do you do when law and order begins to completely breakdown?

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Maybe reform the law and order that regularly lets Police murder citizens because they feel like it?

              You know, how the protestors demanded before their peaceful protest got beaten up in order to escalate violence to deligitimize the demands and present the violent police as necessary.

              • bassomitron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                12 days ago

                I don’t disagree. I was simply providing context, which the other comment I responded to wasn’t addressing.

            • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              12 days ago

              It wasn’t “acceptable,” but what the fuck else do you do when law and order begins to completely breakdown?

              if it isn’t acceptable it isn’t acceptable period. “this was the only way” literally means that you think it was acceptable.

              • bassomitron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                I put it in quotes because I wasn’t meaning it to be so exact.

                But whatever, I’m done arguing with enlightened centrists.

                • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 days ago

                  So you do think the kidnapping off the streets into unmarked vans by the military was somewhat acceptable when the democrats called for it? At least have the gut to come out and say it

    • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      the Democrats had military storming our streets and black bagging US residents en masse

      The Posse Comitatus Act is what generally prevents military from “black bagging US residents” and leaves that job to police.

      Texas was the first state to allow for the national guard to assist in immigration efforts back in 2021. Democrats did nothing to stop, delay or prevent the expansion of those powers which were further pushed and nationalized in 2025.

      The other loophole is invoking the insurrection act. While Biden did not involve it it was repeatedly threatened during the Gaza war protests, however the protests never got too riotous for the Dems to risk damaging their image and the local police were perfectly capable of documenting and black bagging people for it.

      The cases of Kahlil and Mahdawi where Trump attended to deport individuals participating in those protests was made possible by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. That specific bill was introduced by the Democrats, passed the Democratic majority House and Senate, Vetoed by Democratic president Truman before being overridden by the house/Senate.

      You are correct that they are “not the same”, but stating that the shield of your enemy is your friend, just because it isn’t a sword is fucking insane.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      The problem is that both parties are right wings, only one somewhat more extreme. Both defends the rights of big corporations, billonairs and less or nothing those of the rest of the people. Public services, labor rights and even basic rights, like health and education are a bad joke in the US and only available if you have money. Now with Trump it goes even worse.

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      They’re not the same. The Dems stand back and shake their fist/wring their hands when the Repubs have power and run roughshod over them. Then when the Dems have power they allow their efforts to be thwarted by the Repubs and gesture helplessly when in fact they could just push things through themselves.

      Also the DNC is a malfunctioning toilet that costs elections, implying that they think it’s better to have a pro-establishment Repub in power than a Dem maverick.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        Everything except complete submission to the US State department reeks of Russian propaganda to .worlders

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Democrats

    • Retain marriage rights for gay couples.

    • Expand legality of recreational drugs.

    • Free food for schoolchildren.

    • Tax credits for families with children.

    • Subsidized for free childcare.

    • Expand electric car charging nationally.

    • Subsidize sustainable fuel sources.

    • Fact based education standards.

    • Stop racism in policing.

    • Expanded healthcare subsidies.

    • Preserve democracy.

    Republicans

    • Being gay or trans should be illegal.

    • White supremacy is great!

    • Christianity as national religion.

    • Privatize the post office and weather service.

    *Eliminate the EPA, Department of Education.

    • Defund IRS.

    • Disenfranchise nonwhites and women.

    • Antivax agenda.

    • Expand fossil fuel use.

    • Eliminate worker safety laws.

    • Eliminate collective bargaining and union rights.

    • Defunding science research.

    • Deregulate crypto.

    • No regulations on AI.

    • No recognition of child’s educational or bodily autonomy rights.

    • Eliminate hate crime laws except for straight white men.

    • End democracy, install fascist dictatorship.

    But yeah, they are totally the same, right guys? RIGHT!?!

    • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      13 days ago

      Fact based education standards.

      Teaching a bunch of lies about American exceptionalism and how imperialism is actually good isn’t what I’d call “fact based”

      Stop racism in policing

      Right like how democrats in nearly all major cities increased police funding and almost none passed any meaningful reform.

      Expanded healthcare subsidies

      But don’t remotely consider universal healthcare

      Preserve democracy

      Preserve the status quo which I wouldn’t call a democracy. A democracy enacts the will of the people, democrats don’t even have a democratic primary for their own party.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        13 days ago

        Teaching a bunch of lies about American exceptionalism and how imperialism is actually good isn’t what I’d call “fact based”

        That’s a right thing, not a left thing.

        Right like how democrats in nearly all major cities increased police funding and almost none passed any meaningful reform.

        A lot of left leaning places pushed consent decrees, for example:

        https://www.chicagopolice.org/community-policing-group/consent-decree/

        But don’t remotely consider universal healthcare

        The list time Democrats had a filibuster-proof trifecta it was for about 2 months and they passed Obamacare. Since then Republicans have nullified about 40% of it.

        Preserve the status quo which I wouldn’t call a democracy.

        Except by definition it is a democracy. Like it or not, most people vote for the status quo.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      You’ve certainly whitewashed Dems quite a lot. You’re fundamentally not wrong though. As bad as the Dems are, and they are very bad, MAGA is undeniably worse. If we had some other electoral system, we could safely explore other options. But we don’t. We have FPTP, which makes it a binary choice between bad and worse.

      And worse is just so, so much worse. That doesn’t make bad good, but it’s still a binary choice. You’d have to be evil or stupid to try to muddy the waters so that bad seems close enough to worse that people don’t feel the urgency of choosing bad to prevent worse.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        13 days ago

        The lesser evil choice is whichever hastens the collapse of your monstrous, genocidal empire

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        Dems can be convinced to try other election systems besides FPTP because they fundamentally believe in democracy. From my perspective, fixing things without violence is still an option with Dems. It isn’t with Republicans.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          because they fundamentally believe in democracy.

          Westerners will go on and on about how North Koreans are brainwashed to worship their leaders, then say shit like this.

          fixing things without violence

          Apparently doing the modern holocaust doesn’t’ count as “violence” to white supremacist BlueMAGA fascists.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          I’m hoping Musk gets some momentum with his third party. Either it splits the Republican vote and slows down this freefall into fascism, or he dumps tons of resources into promoting some variety of RCV. Either way, that’s a net benefit in my eyes.

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 days ago

          Literally fucking half of the shit you attribute to democrats.

          Stop racism in policing.

          Start here. This is a fucking lie and you’re practically a nazi for whitewashing them

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Its not a lie. The legal progress towards this has come from Democrats. Yeah, it’s not enough and it’s been too long coming. Still, look at which states passed laws on chokeholds and which states passed laws allowing people to run over protesters, then tell me there is no difference in the parties.

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              You’re too easily impressed with the most superficial bullshit possible. The difference you highlighted is purely symbolic on both sides. As if cops are restrained by the law in the first place. Both parties have the exact same policy on policing and your ‘good guys’ are almost exclusively the ones in charge of the cities that actually run those police departments. All they do is give them more funding. And to confound people like you they engage in ‘liberal box checking’ where they ‘do something’ that changes absolutely nothing structurally. And then you turn around and defend these murderers like they’re the good guys. You’re a boob.

              • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                Not allowing choke holds isn’t superficial. Body cams aren’t superficial. They cut down on police use of force and citizen complaints. They also cost money. Better trained police costs money. Sending out social workers with police on domestic calls costs money ,and makes a huge difference in the quality of policing.

                The only substantial reduction in policing cost is cutting back on the drug war and most left leaning states are doing that. (Reducing numbers of police would do it but most states have similar per capita number of police as Europe).

                There is no doubt we have a long way to go on police reform, but to say there has been no progress simply isn’t true.

                • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I’m sorry but you’re extremely too credulous and unthinking.

                  I already explained why and how bans on chokeholds are superficial. Are your senses so dull that you didn’t notice or are you being deliberately dishonest and lazy by not addressing it?

                  Body cams are even more glaring an example. It’s extremely fucking common knowledge that they turn them off whenever they want. Do you think you’re being strategic by ignoring that fact? Because the effect in reality is it makes you sound like an idiot. Your entire premise is undermined.

                  You just straight up have no idea what’s happening in the world around you.

                  https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/08/warrior-cop-class-dave-grossman-killology.html

                  “More training costs money”

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      Well, Democrats are the less evil choice, but all this is peanuts compared to EU social standard, I see here in Spain often US tourists which thinks they are in the future, IN SPAIN, with the rights, services and the freedom people has. Even with the US Democrates, it’s compared like the EU fifty years ago.

    • only_in_ohio@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      Those memes are just contributing to the issue of young people skipping the elections, and then complaining about our leaders being stupid

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        No, even the US has more parties than only those two. In Spain we also had a two party system a lot of years ago, but this changed when the people begone to vote also for other parties than those two, with this we have now several different parties, that makes that there have to create aliances to obtain the mayority do be able to govern, so corresponding more on the reallity of the needs of the people, out of this black and white scheme (or better bright and dark grey). In the US is needed that also enter left wing parties, which represent the basic rights of the people, which currently don’t exist, because they are “anti-american communists”, this is the mantra with which they create the fear in the people to vote it.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          I’m sure repeatedly telling people they need to shut up and never criticize The Party will really reduce apathy.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Criticize all you want. Just recognize there is a difference between a less than ideal party and literal Nazis

              • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 days ago

                I hate it but it’s happening no matter who is in power. Best we can do is a party who isn’t going to throw immigrants in concentration camps.

                • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  If you think that committing a modern holocaust is “less than ideal” you belong in a concentration camp.

            • kreskin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              I wouldnt say a party of genocide supporters who love to kick progressives in the face and dont seem to give 2 shites what their voters want and need, and who have a wildly eroding base and 28% approval doesnt qualify as a:

              good choice

              But I guess if thats what you think I’m not going to change your mind.

              • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                There’s only two choices under the current system and the other one is kidnapping people to put in concentration camps right now. The only chance to change the current system without open armed conflict is the Democrats.

                • kreskin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  I think its time to start looking past democrats as possible agents of change. Justice delayed is justice denied, and the AIPAC centrists are firmly in control and not about to change anything. Rallying behind them just guarantees more loss, at the cost of enabling their corruption. Their base has already left to the point that they cant win anything. They have a 28% approval rating.

  • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    12 days ago

    The fact that there are so many dislikes proves how propagandized the average American is. “How dare you call both sides the same” Well, they ojectively are pretty much the same with few exceptions.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Especially for non-Usian people, doubly especially for those on the working end of US “diplomacy” - bombs, coups and sanctions come regardless of which US administration, there is literally no difference whatsoever.

    • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      12 days ago

      One side supports a criminal Nazi apologist who tried to overthrow our Democracy and hasn’t given up yet. The other side brings a knife to the gun fight.

      They’re not even remotely the same. 40 years ago that may have been closer to true.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        One side supports a criminal Nazi apologist who tried to overthrow our Democracy and hasn’t given up yet.

        And the other side commits genocide. It also overthrows other people’s democracy, but you don’t consider foreigners human.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            Most Democrats express greater sympathy for Palestinians. That’s not what I would call “committing genocide”.

            Committing genocide is committing genocide. What the fuck is wrong with you?

            What I see is Democrat officials expressing support, but powerless against Republicans who do not.

            Then you had your eyes closed for all of 2024

            That’s not supporting genocide. We’re fighting, but losing.

            Genocide denier

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                12 days ago

                Ok, I’ll return your argument strategy exactly as you stated it: [Some thing that in no way resembles anything I said]

                You people really cannot behave in good faith, can you?

                If not, you are a genocide denier and had your eyes closed for all of 2025. What the fuck is wrong with you? You shameful asshole. People are dying and you don’t even give a fuck. You have nothing more to say that I care about until you personally feed an affected person. Hypocrite."

                Incoherent. But I guess I shouldn’t expect more from a genocide apologist fuck like you.

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        One side supports a criminal Nazi apologist who tried to overthrow our Democracy and hasn’t given up yet

    • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      You must be very privileged or very ignorant to see things this way.
      The Democratic Party is somewhat conservative and stand firmly behind capitalism. But they aren’t fascists. Not at all.

      • Grapho@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Uhhhhh yes they are lmao. They just have an insignificantly smaller out group. They consider the rest of the world fair game for death camps, torture, starvation, and everything else Republicans do, and they even agree with most of their most fascist shit (like the children in cages and the Patriot Act, which were not only not stopped but expanded with Dems at the helm).

        They just think gay people and people of color are a sizeable demographic, but not sizeable enough to stop the violence against them, just kind of pretend they’re the only allies.

        They keep doing that because idiots keep buying it. I don’t think Mussolini would have been much better if he copped black slang for his propaganda material and was ok with gay people in the military.

      • Grapho@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Both of them want to kill you and your friends. One is just stupid/racist enough that they’re willing to do away with your labor power ASAP while the other would rather let their billionaire masters squeeze every penny out of you in debt peonage for the rest of your life (hopefully less than 65 years).

        However, I’m far less interested in what they want to do to other gringos than the fact that they’ve been workshopping even worse than this brutality on the rest of us for centuries and y’all were okay with it. You’d continue to be okay with it if there wasn’t a dang Cheeto in the white house or whatever the fuck.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Let me rephrase: one of them is willing to let me and my friends die because they’re more interested in making money than providing for our needs, and one of them wants to shoot us in the fucking heads for being queer. But yeah the ones who hate us for being queer aren’t actually worse than the ones who simply don’t care about us

          They also want to shoot you in the head for not being white. But yeah, no worse than the ones who simply don’t care about your wellbeing. In fact, the latter deserves even more of your ire, for some reason

          • Jentu@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 days ago

            One willing to do the bad thing while the other not willing to do anything about it (and resistant towards any change) is just voting between the Uvalde school shooter and the uvalde cops that prevented parents from going in and saving their children.

          • Grapho@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Nice ahistorical analogy, but the democrats have proven very capable of literally killing people abroad for the crime of being brown and desiring autonomy, as well as turning a blind eye when cops and the national security apparatus murder people on a whim at home. So forgive me for not seeing them as polar opposites.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 days ago

            me and my friends die

            “Sure, they may be committing a modern Holocaust, but what about MEEEEEEE”

            Western liberals are the most self centred people alive, you literally don’t see foreigners as real people.

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              Meeeeee, and also all of the other non-cishets, non-whites, and non-men

              You’re right though, western liberals are the worst. I’m going to take your advice and become a western conservative, and will be doing my best to actively hurt people, because you think it’s better when American women and gays and nonwhites die than when they don’t

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                all of the other

                Once again, we are reminded that western liberals literally don’t conceptualise foreigners as real people.

                I’m going to take your advice and become a western conservative

                By all means, the difference is entirely performative; conservatives are just more honest about it.

        • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          12 days ago

          We’re talking concentration camp vs no concentration camp here. Child rapist vs no child rapist. International cooperation vs tariff chaos.

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            Who are you crediting with ‘no concentration camp’ here? The party that performatively cried outside of one and then ignored it when they were in power?

            Are you SERIOUSLY pretending the democrats aren’t complicit in ‘child rapist’??

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            yes of course history will remember Biden as a historic, effective, deeply moral president who did the right thing when times were rough, and left behind a lasting legacy of peace and progress.

          • Grapho@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            Biden couldn’t stop touching and kissing clearly uncomfortable, random kids in front of hundreds of cameras. He’s been accused of rape. Stop pretending we all live in your Marvel movie concept of the world.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Honestly not much changed for me. I wasnt interested in travelling to the US. I am not interested in buying or selling product in the US.

        However i wake up every morning to yet another stream of people being brutally murdered by the US or with US support through US allies. My country keeps hosting a drone relay station integral to US murder programs in the Middle East and everyone in politics pretends this to be okay and the US soldiers stationed here to be totally for our safety and as not being quasi occupied and serving as a logistics hub for invasions, mass murder and genocide.

        Another issue i care about is child rapists not getting away with their crimes. Turns out the US administrations of two Republicans and two Democrats have been covering up a child rapist ring involving thousands of victims and probably as many perpetraitors, with a former D and a current R president among the rapists.

        My country is quasi occupied by a natiom of child rapists and there is reason to believe they rape here too, as the US soldiers are knowm for that.

      • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Seriously, this is the kind of bullshit that swings so far left it circles back to right.

        The goal of this administration is to remove existing government institutions and replace them with far right traditionalist based institutions that the creator of the Heritage Foundation (Paul Weyrich) began writing about ~1999.

        I think that we have to look at a whole series of possibilities for bypassing the institutions that are controlled by the enemy. If we expend our energies on fighting on the “turf” they already control, we will probably not accomplish what we hope, and we may spend ourselves to the point of exhaustion. The promising thing about a strategy of separation is that it has more to do with who we are, and what we become, than it does with what the other side is doing and what we are going to do about it.

        The people that created the term “cultural marxism,” want you to believe this stupid both sides are essentially the same shit so you’re less resistant to them dismantling the parts of government that people had to fight very hard for. Voters rights, civil rights, and civil liberties have always been under attack by this same group of people. Now you’ve got this dumbass propaganda telling people that since those rights have always been under attack, you might as well just assume it won’t matter if they cease to exist.

        “I don’t want everybody to vote… As a matter of fact, our leverage in the election quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.” -Paul Weyrich

          • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            Apologies for the facts and documented history you don’t want to hear 🤷‍♀️

            I know Project 2025 hasn’t been brought up nonstop over the last year or anything, but if you can somehow imagine a publicly available document laying all this shit out point by point, it might help you understand where I’m coming from.

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      12 days ago

      “Everyone who is an adult who realizes there is no unicorn party is completely propagandized. I am le very smart.”

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    I dunno, no Democrat ever threatened to make my country the 51st state since the 19th century…

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Congratulations not to be a citizen of one of the many countries that have been under the barrel of Democratic forign policy. But apparently it’s fine to do it to non-white countries

    • Kinperor@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      The US plans some of their invasion/regime change over the course of years if not decades.

      I honestly believe that Trump was briefed on some plans to annex Greenland, Canada and Panama, and the fucking buffoon let the cat out of the bag.

      I have something like 57% certainty that democrats would eventually start denouncing “fentanyl labs” in Canada and create excuses for invasion.

      edit: Worth noting, by the way, that’s it’s a consensus that Canada is more liberal than the US. Having Canada as a 51st state would essentially be handling the Dems a huge advantage for all elections going forward… Gee golly, I wonder whether they might actually root for Don a little bit, there.

      • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Having us as one state - jamming Quebec, BC, Ontario, etc all together would be a recipe for disaster above and beyond all the other disasters involved. It would be like, I don’t know, merging New York and Georgia into one state.

        The FLQ alone would instantly revive and start up their bombing campaigns again.

        And be real, they would never give us status as states. We’d be Puerto Rico North at best until the violence died down in a century of terrorism and genocide.

        • Kinperor@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 days ago

          Having us as one state - jamming Quebec, BC, Ontario, etc all together would be a recipe for disaster above and beyond all the other disasters involved. It would be like, I don’t know, merging New York and Georgia into one state. The FLQ alone would instantly revive and start up their bombing campaigns again.

          The American elites are not above fostering a state of crisis and chaos. The BLM riots happened under Biden’s administration. Biden had deportation camps. Look at current day USA.

          These “disasters” are not the deterrent you think it is.

          And be real, they would never give us status as states. We’d be Puerto Rico North at best until the violence died down in a century of terrorism and genocide.

          Being “real” would be admitting that the US empire is on the verge of collapses. I think decades of continuation is possible, but unlikely. Century? Impossible (at least, for the current statu quo).

  • shrugs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Change my mind

    Capitalism is a tool to maximize profit. Whoever thought it was a good idea to let capitalism have influence on laws so that they can maximize its profit was a big fool.

    What do you expect? Capitalism, a tool, has by definition no morale. Let it decide politics to increase profit and you end up with that kind of shit society we have today.

    Don’t blame the hammer, when you hit your thumb. Also, don’t let the hammer decide where to make the biggest dent.

    Can we please start again focusing on the people? Without people there is no society, and there is no market to increase profits.

    Start using capitalism and free markets like a tool. Want more renewable and clean energy? Make rules and see the magic of capitalism in making the best out of it.

    Instead we let capitalism decide what should be done next and suffer the consequences. It’s as easy as that.

    Unfortunately capitalism not only create the rules, they also decide what is news and influence societies views. And that’s why OPs picture is as it is.

    Fuck socialism, am I right guys?!

    • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I agree with this 100%.

      Capitalism is exceptional at finding ways to provide value when there is a new market. The issue comes when capital gets accumulated and concentrated in the hands of a few.

      We’ve seen it dozens of times throughout history where a healthy merchant class with lots of opportunity for upwards mobility ends up in an oligarchy as the market becomes saturated then monopolies, duopolies, and cabals (guilds) form.

      The state needs to use the “P” and “L” in PESTEL forces (Political, Economical, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal) that businesses (from single to large multinational) to identify new markets that need investment.

      An examples would be new clean renewable electricity and one way of giving preferrence to this green energy by minimally taxing profts on this energy sold in the national market or international market via grid-interconnect networks (“Gridternets” if you will) with a clear plan to increase the tax to a normalised amount slowly overtime as the green share of the market approaches 100%.

      It also has to be used to more aggressively dissuade markets that are more harmful than good now. An example of this is dirty power.

      Coal, Oil, and Gas have done wonders for increasing people’s quality of life because they unlocked a new energy density previously unattainable. Now we have alternatives that are by every metric better; more efficient and less polluting.

      Therefore, these industries need to be taxed out of existence by using a logarithmic energy carbon tax that keeps increasing year on year. Corruption needs to be rooted out like a weed as much as possible using a politically independent organ of the state to keep it healthy.

      Then there’s markets that are stagnant in some state of capture: crumbling infrastructure, food retailer hypermarkets, etc. Windfall suprise taxes on incumbents and grants / zero interest loans for new competitors would reignight competition in those markets and the additional tax revenue can be used to fix the crumbling infrastructure these markets rely on.

      And finally, I’d like to see a strong preference for co-operatives where ownership in a free market is much more evenly distributed by making them the least taxed commercial entities with businesses that have a higher concentration of ownership are taxed more through some sort of profit tax multiplier.

      It’s much harder for a business to act in a pure profit motive to the detriment of society if the employees have more ownership as it allows morality to be expressed through political power within this business. These employees also then benefit from the profit share as well which gives stability and upward mobility in exchange for their labour.

      There, that’s three proposals that could help towards decarbonisation, investing in underfunded infrastructure, and reducing inequality.

      I am not a policy expert and there’s bound to be problems with each of those proposals that I haven’t thought of, but we have so much more to gain by working cooperatively together to build a system that aims to better humanity as a whole by using the best tools correctly and safety.

      Until we reach an energy density which unlocks technology that enables things like a resourceless economy (a la Star Trek luxury space communism), we’re stuck with the tools of money and capital as the ways to transfer value.

      I personally can’t wait for the day where “reputation” rather than money becomes the currency of society, I am willing to work with the tools we have right now to build that future, and I have faith that others are willing to build it with me.

  • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    13 days ago

    To be fair, you have to credit Democrats with Obamacare which was really a way to improve the lives of poorer people

    • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Obamacare is responsible for finding the masses in my breasts right now so I like it. I’d like it more if just everyone could go to the doctor and not have to ask, like I do, “is it covered by my insurance”

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      I credit Dems with making Mitt Romney’s healthcare plan worse, by removing the public option - the thing that would have actually improved the lives of poorer people. Instead, we simply shoveled some 30mil Americans right into the pockets of predatory insurance companies.

      The only silver lining from that legislation was preventing them from denying care due to pre-existing conditions, and that point has been an all out battleground ever since.

    • redsunrise@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      One half-baked concession to the poor doesn’t imply their party platform is about improving the lives of poor people.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    DNC is a huge problem with America as was Biden/Garland. They need/needed Trump to not fall out of a window, or be in military jail, in order for the most warmongering neocon DNC candidates to ensure warmongering. After Oct 7th, DNC’s Israel first “job is to gaslight the left into supporting Israel”, meant ensuring Trump’s win, and today, have their elected Zionist supremacists, repeat attacks of communism on Mamdani.

    On global warming, forcing a proxy war on Russia, not only enriches domestic oil companies to fund climate denial. pushing global diesel (home heating fuel same fraction) refining capacity to limit, with massive emissions from war, it also means no cooperation with Russia possible on global warming. It is simply impossible to prioritize human sustainability, if voters are made to support war, while struggling with the economic collapse directly accelerated by it, not to mention cultural divisiveness issues (not DNC/Biden fault).

    The US needs either a military coup, or candidates/party that will remove citizenship and assets of Zionist oligarchy influencing US rulership. If money is speech, then money is terrorism.

  • tsc67@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    Just a reminder that the function of the Democratic party is to continually reduce expectations so that this diagram seems reasonable.

  • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    13 days ago

    We may have got here eventually anyway, but things are a lot worse for Americans right now because of Trump’s Republicans. Let’s not lose sight of that when complaining about the shit they have in common.

    There’s also nobody who might emerge out of the right who would bring something that will make life for everyone better. Only the Democrats have a chance of doing that and engineering a better system that might eventuallyundermine their own political hegemony. Would they without pressure? Of course not. But the right will never even be pressured to do anything like that intentionally by it’s base, almost by definition basically.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Only the Democrats have a chance of doing that and engineering a better system that might eventuallyundermine their own political hegemony.

      No they don’t

      But the right will never even be pressured to do anything like that intentionally by it’s base,

      The Democrats couldn’t be pressured to stop doing genocide even at the cost of losing the election

      • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        13 days ago

        I don’t think you’re listening. That’s one of the issues both sides share in common that sucks. Doesn’t change the fact they’re our only hope.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          I’m listening, I just think you’re wrong.

          And I brought up that issue specific to show that the Democrats also “will never even be pressured to do anything like that intentionally by it’s base”

          • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            13 days ago

            Progressive social change has always occurred under the auspices of the left-most of the two major parties. That’s just how it overwhelmingly is. What’s not to agree with? How do you think progress will happen next time it happens?

            • gucken@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              The hallmark progressive achievements made in this country, many that still exist today (to varying degrees ofc) were a result of third party sweat, blood and tears. Literally.

              I recommend reading about the social/workers rights movements of the early 1900s. The Progressive Party led by Roosevelt, The Bull Moose Party with social reformers like Jane Addams and Florence Kelly, the Socialist Party of Eugene Debs… all of these were most prominent in fighting for and ultimately producing a cluster of social welfare, social insurance reforms, women’s suffrage, workers rights/5 day work week, etc.

              It was the dedication, pressure and will to not fall in line trying to change the two-party duopoly from within but to build their own coalitions, their own movements on the outside, and thus the mainstream parties were eventually forced to inscribe the populus demands into legislation.

              All that to say, healthy third parties are a good thing. It builds actual pressure on your legislators. Politicians wont work on your behalf when they know you’re voting for them anyway – just line their pockets with money from the bourgeois they actually legislate for. Seeking the change you wish to see via third party can and has produced tremendous gains for the working class.

              • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                13 days ago

                You can and should support them as they align with your values, but you’ll never get enough votes for them to have any chance of overthrowing the big two. It has to be changed from within, unless you’re prepared to try violence.

                • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Fuck voting, organizing is where its at. I swear if just half the free time as some people on here… (not you specifically)

        • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          12 days ago

          The thing is that your asking tankies to be pragmatic about policy. They would rather let the Palestinian Genocide continue and works lose more rights than to do anything helpful in the near or medium term. They just aren’t serious about the issues.

          Its easy for the .ml types to cry and wait for a perfect policy or candidate. They aren’t going hungry, nor under seige of any kind.

          • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            The thing is that your asking tankies to be pragmatic about policy.

            This “pragmatism” is how we got here in the first place.

            Its easy for the .ml types to cry and wait for a perfect policy or candidate.

            We’re not looking for a perfect candidate under bourgeois democracy, because we know it will never happen. Previously:

            The US government was never not captured by the bourgeoisie, because the US was born of a bourgeois revolution[1]. The wealthy, white, male, land-owning, largely slave-owning Founding Fathers constructed a bourgeois state with “checks and balances” against the “tyranny of the majority”. It was never meant to represent the majority—the working class—and it never has, despite eventually allowing women and non-whites (at least those not disenfranchised by the carceral system) to vote. BBC: [Princeton & Northwestern] Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy

            • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              12 days ago

              We’re not looking for a perfect candidate under bourgeois democracy, because we know it will never happen. Previously:

              In either case you’re not doing shit and you’re not a serious movement. Tankies don’t vote to minimize harm, nor do they vote to expand the progressive wing.

              You all are effectively the ratchet democratsyou laughs at because you ultimately won’t show or organize for anything. Tankies aren’t serious people.

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                Schrodinger’s leftists; simultaneously the reason the Democrats lost the election and the biggest obstacle to progress, but also not a serious movement.

                • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Non.voting is the largest block going back multiple cycles. Trolls like you are concerned but not enough to show up. I’m aware of your trolling, so I won’t entertain you much more

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I fucking hope, but we already seen that at 1st Trump term and after Biden was elected entire EU again got back to licking US boot, including something as unbelivable as fully allowing nordstream sabotage.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          It don’t though, it just rises the price of energy because the gas still flows, even more than before, just from USA, Norway and yes, sill Russia, even more of it, but through middlemen. The sabotage also caused significant ecological catastrophe in the Baltic.

          About the sabotage itself you have three versions available:

          1. Truth, that USA bombed it, possibly with participation of Norway (note above paragraph, curiously the very same countries that gained the most on it, qui bono, eh?)
          2. USA version, where Ukraine did it, despite lacking means
          3. Official German/EU version, that is no version, because both above versions means that Germany is either vassal (ver1) or war ally (ver2) of country which attacked Germany in a biggest peacetime sabotage in German history.
            • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Bullshit. German politics is riddled with the same talking points as the US. Just today i read a german article talking about a “german roe v wade”

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 days ago

              Republicans just convinced Europe that the USA cannot be trusted anymore

              FYI: in the EU we don’t play the “it was Biden vs it was Trump” game. We stop at “it was the US”.

              What?

              • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                I doubt that US extortion will be reversed in any future DNC election victory. Only antagonism, and resulting colapse of US, which has yet to be manifested, will result in reversal.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  You literally just said that it was because of Republicans that the EU soured on the US and now you’re telling me that in the EU you don’t look at which party is in charge but at the US as a whole. Do you not see how these statements are contradictory?

  • Awkwardparticle@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    12 days ago

    One side created secret police and are kidnapping people off of the streets to put into concentration camps. End of fucking discussion.

    • ShotDonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      Building on a police state that was 50% pre-built by The Other Party™ but hey who could have thought that bad guys could ever take advantage of it!

      • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        12 days ago

        Exactly. When terrorists take over a police station it’s really the police’s fault for existing the first place.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      Biden didn’t shut down any of the ICE concentration camps Trump opened the last time he was president.

      Also Guantanamo Bay has had bipartisan support since the beginning.

      • admin@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        When Trump terminated the USAID, Some very liberal who used to advocate for “Women and children” people came out with how No USAID means the USA will lose leverage,like We know you don’t care but at least don’t promote such disgusting foulplays.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      And the other side was in power for 4 years but did nothing to prevent this from happening

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    13 days ago
    > republicans
    > hostility to Russia
    

    Let me guess, your preferred form of government is “petty dictator killing people for not following the same exact lifestyle as he wants, but virtue signals to communism”.