• 6stringringer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    My friend had a a cat that as a human would have been a balding, neurotic man with a mustache and glasses. A very high strung cat tbh. His name was Mr. Pappy.

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 days ago

    Generally speaking, the terms man and woman are reserved specifically for humans. I couldn’t tell you why, but I suppose it doesn’t really matter.

    For pets, the use of boy/girl probably does have a lot to do with how people tend to infantilize their companion animals.

    Additionally, the boy / girl terminology is often generalized to cover all animals, particularly when adults are interacting with children and by extension when children are interacting with each other. It’s not uncommon to have a child ask something like “is that a boy rabbit or a girl rabbit?” but it is a little unusual to hear an adult ask another adult that same question, unless it’s sort of tongue-in-cheek or maybe in the presence of kids.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Adults would generally use actual adjectives, ‘male/female cat’ instead of ‘man/woman/boy/girl cat’

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Human/animal bonding is aided because their faces retain neotenic features that remind us of babies. So many are inclined to relate to them like children.

    From that article:

    Accumulating behavioral and neurophysiological studies support the idea of infantile (cute) faces as highly biologically relevant stimuli rapidly and unconsciously capturing attention and eliciting positive/affectionate behaviors, including willingness to care. It has been hypothesized that the presence of infantile physical and behavioral features in companion (or pet) animals (i.e., dogs and cats) might form the basis of our attraction to these species.

    It has been hypothesized that both behavioral and physical infantile features present in companion animals might form the basis of our attraction to these animals and may bear some part of the responsibility for our motivational drive to pet-keeping and pet-caretaking (Archer, 1997).

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      That’s weird because babies are ugly. Cats, on the other hand, are just so… hey wait a minute, my cat stole my heart 💘😼

      This spell, so potent… 😍🐈

    • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think this might be a case of cart-before-horse. It seems obvious to me that domesticated animals have these traits because they were selected for by our ancestors, not the other way around.

        • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I feel like the factors that shape our drive towards cuteness and what we find cute are not immaterial to our present attitudes towards pets… but no doubt you’re right to point out that there can be more than one factor at play.