I have donated in the past, but then there were wild accusations, people saying it’s not needed, it’s to fund other things, and so on and so forth.

Yesterday I got the popup begging for a couple of euros, so what’s the status? Should I donate or is it a waste of time and money?

Cheers

Edit: Thanks for all the insightful posts! I’m jobless at the moment so just ten bucks this time:

  • jxk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Remember that there is a lot of anti-Wikipedia propaganda going around these days. Most “outrage” against Wikipedia is created and pushed artificially.

  • Blubber28@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    In the current day and age of misinformation I think donating is more important than ever. It doesn’t need to be much.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Reddit users and now lemmy users seem to have a riotous distaste for non-profits generally.

    Wikipedia is one of the last, good parts of the internet, and it’s under increasing threat.

  • DeadPixel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’ve increased the amount I donate since the campaign to discredit them has been in effect.

    Maybe they aren’t perfect, but I don’t like the idea of a world without such a wonderful resource being freely available to everyone no matter their background or financial status.

    I used it a lot as a student but couldn’t afford to donate then. I don’t use it directly a lot these days, but I’m sure indirectly it contributes to articles I read, & I can afford to donate now, so I try to pay it back & some.

    Information is power, & those in/with power seem to currently be trying their best to bring everyone else down. Any small thing I can do to help prevent that is a win in my book.

  • Humanius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Wikipedia, being a free source of information, is an incredibly important resource and a net good for humanity. But since Wikipedia is free for all they rely on donations to keep the lights on.

    There are groups who would prefer it if that free access to information did not exist, or could be more easily be controlled and/or manipulated. It is in their interest to convince people not to donate to Wikipedia

    I’m convinced that this “don’t donate to Wikipedia” messaging that has cropped up in recent years is a psyop, set up by these groups with the goal to starve Wikipedia of income.

    Don’t fall for it. Support one of the last truly good places on the internet.

  • gi1242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    13 days ago

    DONATE!

    Wikipedia made a conscious choice to remain free, ad free and neutral.

    They get my money! Even if they don’t need it.

  • MHLoppy@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    I simultaneously believe that Wikipedia is valuable and that it’s not clear that WMF needed $185 million dollars.

    As far as I can tell the situation has not significantly changed since “the last time(s)” this was discussed. Wikipedia remains a valuable resource, and WMF continues to aggressively increase both spending and fundraising revenue. Whether you think that means you should donate or not is probably the same answer as it was several years ago for most individuals based on personal preferences.

    edit: typo

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 days ago

      I think the answer has changed a bit since they got a much better CEO who’s doing a lot more communication and engagement with the community, which dictates what Wikipedia looks like

      • MHLoppy@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 days ago

        Before posting I read the recent annual reports which she advertises having a hand in as part a push for greater transparency, but was still left very unsatisfied personally (half the budget – over $90 mil – just hand-waved away as “infrastructure” spending? Really?). So despite being an improvement, I didn’t feel that the CEO change has had much effect on the scales of “donate vs not”. Perhaps for others it might, but my comment still reflects my best judgement.

  • RacerX@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    12 days ago

    I give small monthly donations to three things:

    • Wikipedia
    • EFF
    • Internet Archive
  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Always fund Wikipedia if you have the ability to

    It may not need a donation at any given time, but given how volatile things are in the USA right now, there’s every chance they might find themselves needing to suddenly spend a lot on lawyers

    It’s arguably one of the most important resources we have as humanity. It’s imperative we protect it.

  • last_philosopher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    13 days ago

    I give through my employer which matches donations. You should look into whether that’s available since it’ll double the amount.

    Decentralized truth is essential to human freedom. It’s not enough to just run wikipedia as a bare bones site, they need to be able to adapt to the times and maybe even fund new projects with the same goals. For people who actually care about the future, it’s hard to think of a better use of the money.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I wonder if I could get my employer to match donations, be it Wikipedia or other projects or foss, with or without work use 🤔

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I give them a little every year, and do not consider it a waste at all. I give $ each month to the community radio station with local news on it too.

    Those free nonprofit media companies are important. They are the voice of the people.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 days ago

      they hate it, because it has all the info of everything bad that a republican/conservative, far right government did, and its very hard to deflect/ or deny the amount of evidence from it.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    It’s good to see Fediverse people actually supporting paying for something. Sometimes I think they want everything for free.

    • BrainBow65@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 days ago

      I don’t think people here mind paying for stuff I think it’s more that enshittification and subscription based business models should not be supported.

      • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 days ago

        Exactly. We don’t just flatly refuse to spend money on anything. We expect a certain level of service and value for money. Wikipedia, though not perfect, is probably one of the most useful tools on the internet.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      There are multiple factions. Some of us are happy to pay the people who produce the stuff we enjoy.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      It’s not that I want everything for free, it’s that I want money to no longer be a factor in life. Like in The Orville.

      (Star Trek too, I assume, but I’m not a Trekkie so I can’t confirm whether or not money exists in that universe.)