• aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    222
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Funny, my digitized collection of movies and TV shows seems to be working just fine. :3

      • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        126
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I think they were just pointing out that this is the problem with subscription services. You own nothing and you’re screwed when the service goes down.

        It really doesn’t take “ludicrous amounts of time and money” to build a private library. It’s interesting how the subscription giants have managed to change people’s perceptions - when you buy content to keep, you keep some of the value, but when you subscribe you’re just getting a time pass to use someone else’s library and won’t see that money again.

        They sold the proposition on convenience when everything was in one place, but now it’s all fragmented it’s a waste of money.

        And of course plenty of people are building media libraries for free by sailing the seas.

      • SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        streaming service: 15-20€ per month per service me: vpn 5€ and a cheap hard drive

        i’d be poorer with subscribing

          • SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            i don’t really understand your point. even buying used dvd’s or blu-rays is marginally cheaper than subscription services. people just became too comfortable.

            users pay for convenience and when the service stops their money is gone and they have nothing in return.

          • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 month ago

            Nope, buying things second hand should be considered just as bad as pirating as you’re depriving the creators of their entitlements, just to take your argument to its logical conclusion.

            • Flic@mstdn.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              @CmdrShepard49 @dukemirage If ten people want to store or listen to the same original album at the same time then the creator gets to sell ten copies. Then they might hand them on, but ten copies are still out there. Maybe an eleventh person wants one but they’re all in use - they’re going to have to go back to the creator and buy a new one. If someone pirates one copy and gives it to nine people for them all to have at the same time then the creator only sells one copy, forever.

      • teft@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ludicrous amounts of time and money? What do you think is involved with media piracy? lol

        • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          To be fair, if they are talking about digitizing your own library, yes, it can take a lot of time. When I attempted it, each DVD took about a half hour to 45 minutes to rip. I flat out didn’t have that kind of time with the size of my collection. It is way easier, although riskier, to download.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I did it in a few weeks. I basically swapped discs while playing games, before going to work, before bed, etc. It was tedious, but I got them all.

            Now when I buy one, I’ll rip it first before watching.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Fun fact, in some countries like mine, downloading is completely legal, it’s the uploading back or seeding that’s illegal.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ludicrous amounts of time and money? What do you think is involved with media piracy?

          those tall ships are not cheap, and have you seen the price of parrots?

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        lmao, buddy you can get a 10tb hard drive for like $200 and fit all the pirated media you want on it. that’s less money than two mainline subscriptions for a year.

        the VAST majority of data hoarders are pirates. very very few actual spend fortunes on their media collections. that’s why everyone is dogpilling you. it felt like you were attacking a strawman of the average user here and they feel the need to correct you about their nature.

        it’s not about pirates feeling moral or superior. it’s about you being wrong about data hoarders.

          • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            yeah, you certainly can spend more and get better, but most media consumers don’t actually care about long term storage like that.

            i only know the pricing on those drives because i just had to replace one in a nas device. i only spent money on a nas device because i work in media and need to keep large files for clients. i follow a 3-2-1 backup system because my job depends on it, but it’s not at all necessary to enjoy media.

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just let us be excited

        This is our version when there’s a big storm and your neighbourhood dads start going around with chainsaws offering to cut up downed trees.

      • Novaling@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        So, in the US, a standalone, bare-minimum with ads included Disney+ subscription costs $9.99. Oops, actually we’re raising it to $11.99 TOMORROW! So after a paying for a year of Dinsey’s cheapest plan, you’d have paid $144.

        But maybe Disney isn’t your thing? Well. Netflix costs $7.99 for the ad plan, and $17.99 for the no ads plan. But do note, even on the ad supported plan, you STILL can’t watch everything.

        Ad-supported, all mobile games and most movies and TV shows are available. A lock icon will appear on unavailable titles.

        Ranges $96-216 per year for ads or no ads.

        Like anime? Crunchyroll offers a $7.99 plan, but it might not have all the content, so then there’s the $11.99 plan. So $96-144 per year. But their catalog doesn’t even have every fucking anime, and they’ve let dubbing go to the wayside after buying out their main competitor, Funimation (in which we lost several anime due to licensing).

        Listen to music on top of that? Spotify for non-students ($5.99) costs $11.99, so $144 in a year. YT music is $10.99 for non-students, so $132

        So say you listen to Spotify, like anime, and watch Netflix, you’re paying at minimum $336 per year, on the cheapest plans available, which usually have ads or missing features.

        I’ve been looking at Optiplex and Lenovo ThinkCentres on ebay recently, and for my bare minimum standards of 1. Can support virtualization, 2. Can do Intel quick sync video and encode HEVC 10-bit (So about 10 year old devices) the prices range around $90-$150. Some 2TB HDDs would be about $100. You’d probably be pirating since most of the new shows on streaming services have no physical media to buy/no way of just owning a movie or TV box set. Even then, outright buying music and movies is cheaper in the long run. Anything you already own can be added to your library. You’ll never be told that “oops we didn’t pay to re-up our access to that movie, so it’s gone!” You’ll never have new ads, paywalled features, limited devices, or other bullshit. The server is up whenever you want it to be, provided you can handle being tech support.

        So in the end, a home server + drives costs less than paying for several services where you own shit, and they can cut features or raise the price any day. But yes, we’re just being conceited assholes.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Dawg even pirate stream sites don’t host on AWS and GCP, you can still watch your content for free online without worrying about a cloud outage because pirate sites actually distribute their files on several cloud platforms since they’re technically always at risk of DMCA lol.

  • BozeKnoflook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status

    I suspect the big problem is that IAM (AWS authentication system) is affected and it is not decentralized, which is causing other systems worldwide to fail because the internal authentication is broken.

    I can’t login to the AWS console to check on my stuff in the European zone, because the login goes through IAM in us-east-1 where all the authentication does.

    It really highlights just how centralized so much of the internet is on like three companies (Amazon, Microsoft, and Google)

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is a chrome addon that will “block” anything from AWS with the goal being you get to see how much of the world relies on it.

      I’m starting to understand why some companies are starting to exit AWS and back to their own data centers.

      • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s the ebb and flow of IT hosting / support.

        On prem -> off prem -> on prem -> off prem

        Same goes for off shore workers. Back and forth back and forth

        Every company I’ve ever worked for has had that flip flop. :/

    • eah@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      It really highlights just how centralized so much of the internet is on like three companies (Amazon, Microsoft, and Google)

      Cloudflare: What am I? Chopped liver?

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sorry I missed this. I was too busy enjoying my library of media locally over Jellyfin.

  • albsen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 month ago

    its us-east-1 as usual, I guess its that time of the year. and the companies haven’t changed either… so, basically the IT guys told the budget approvers we need more money they calculated it and said, no. see you next year for another one.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 month ago

    Looks like it was an Amazon AWS outage. Just geos to how how vulnerable the Internet is as it becomes ever more concentrated into the hands of the tech giants.

    • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      As someone who works in tech I occasionally point out to people that if Jeff Bezos decided to go full supervillain he could hold the internet hostage. If you disabled AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud individually the cascading failures on the various systems would take weeks to fix, which we might not have with a supply chain collapse. Genuinely, I think there’s a real chance it could trigger the collapse of human civilization

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      The mindblowing part of it for me is that a company the size of Disney don’t seem to have the appetite to own and run their own servers.

      These are the same people that managed to get two counties redistricted so that they could own their own city, and to this day literally buy the entire electorate by giving housing only to people who vote the way they’re told to.

      • Attacker94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        They’re being run by accountants, and one thing accountants hate is paying people to do a job, its always “far easier” just to pay a company for that.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hehe. Imagine managing your house in the cloud, and suddenly there is no heating, no light, all the “smart” appliances don’t work anymore, and the shower only produces cold water, because the shower thermostat got a “0” as return value when asking for the preferred temperature…

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There’s a good reason why I refuse to use cloud connected or Internet required “smart” devices.

      It’s essentially an excuse for shitty engineering.

      If you really need a device to be cloud connected then it can also maintain local data when the remote server is down. Even better, it uses an open spec and you can standup your own server.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Of course. But 99% of the population is either too lazy or to dumb for that, or such problems would not exist.

        • melfie@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          99% of the population is either too lazy…

          Nudges an unopened box of Zigbee door sensors ordered 2 years ago to the back of the shelf.

    • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not that far off. I woke up to an Internet outage and none of my home lighting routines fired off and I couldn’t control my lights via wifi. I got it under control shifting to Bluetooth but for a second it was infuriating.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        the fact that your home network setup for this relies on an internet connection is baffling

        • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Games that require persistent internet are baffling to me… I mean the hitman games cannot store your mission achievements offline…

          But games are games… if my stove and fridge and showers (fucking showers with wifi?) Need internet connectivity then that is bullshit. They are being too fucking optimistic about everything.

          • melfie@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Knowing a game is spying on me ruins the fun. My Steam Deck is blocked from the internet for that reason, but a fair number of games on Steam won’t work without connectivity. I seem to remember hearing about some girl who shares a huge collection of games that don’t require connectivity, though.

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Games like that are also baffling to me, thankfully I’ve not purchased one but I would return it as soon as I discovered the limitation if that were to happen

    • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      God, so many things gone wrong there. At least they could use “30” as the default value, right???

    • BD89@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Its back up now but that’s because Signal uses AWS.

      I like signal and use it daily, but it is very strange that an app built for privacy and security doesn’t let you self host. I wonder about the reasoning behind that sometimes.

    • veee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      It appears to be resolved now? I’m able to message people.

  • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    I sure do love working at an MSP during times like this. Today fuckin sucked. Clients called in non-stop about things being broke AND our ticketing and remote support software was up and down all day

    • Nikls94@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      People are too uneducated to just see what works and what doesn’t and add 1 and 1 together. If Google or WhatsApp work and Amazon doesn’t then it‘s definitely an Amazon problem.