• A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hierarchical work environments or “employeeism” teach you to not commit to more than what is expected of you - the likelihood of your own engagement being turned against you is always higher than the opposite.

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yes!!

        And if agile is done right, it combines the powers, the worst of all worlds!

        • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          You get criticised if you overestimate and if you underestimate so better to overestimate and then just fill out the time with nothing if it turns out to be a 10 minutes fix.

          • Strider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Absolutely!

            And also: if the projected path doesn’t work it’s a huge issue (who was wrong?) and bother so instead it’s easier to just work and keep up the ticket front, hence it might be different altogether leading to agile for the sake of agile without any connection to the facts.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    4 months ago

    My old job was a bunch of… idiots? Class traitors? Cowards?

    Management would make noises about arbitrary deadlines and they’d all be like “we better work late tonight and through the weekend!!”

    Did all that work and got nothing for it. Most of them still got laid off. Management still owns the company.

    • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      4 months ago

      I had a boss who used to tell me “my job is to get the most out of you for the least amount of money”

      I used to tell him “you’re paying me $12 hr, you get $12 hr of work out of me.”

      When corporate doubled our workload and refused to let us hire more people he started getting up our asses about working harder, because the workload was piling up. I said “well, if the work doesn’t get done you and the other manager have to answer for it, not me, I’m still leaving at 5, figure it out.” My coworker and I were supposed to be doing the work that 5 people were doing at another location, and my coworker stood in solidarity with my open rebellion.

      My boss had to do his job plus help me and my coworker with ours to keep corporate off his back :)

      • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s nice. Corporate told us we’d need to do overtime every week to justify them employing another person. Our department leader told us to please do it. I just continue to do my contract hours and silently judge them for working too much, knowing their family isn’t happy about it. Instead of unionising and pushing for raises and shorter work hours, they’re letting the company treat them like slaves. I guess they all enjoy wasting their single life kissing the boot?

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      There used to be loyalty in business. Then they realized what a mistake that was.

      You owe your employer nothing more than what’s legally agreed upon in your employment contract.

      If they ask for more, your response without hesitation should be “fuck you, pay me”.

      Don’t do anything for these fucks, for free.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        There was loyalty when it went both ways. That includes your employer paying more if you work more or times are good, and the return they get is you taking on extra work when times are tough.

        Very few companies still do this and they’re all small businesses. Most people will never work at a place like that. Hence fypm is the correct attitude now.

        Of course there are other exceptions. I’ve taken on extra shit and later negotiated it into a raise. But that also might not work for most people.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      A Dutch writer coined a verb for that 'epibreren/to epibrate (loose translation).

      It means ‘walking around looking busy’ but it sounds like something important, so when asked what you’ve been doing you can answer ‘i was busy epibrating’.

      It makes the interlocutor feel like you’ve done something important, yet he’d feel silly about asking what it is exactly what you’ve been doing.

  • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    The reward for efficient work is more work.

    And of course the expectations that you always work that fast.

    Oh, and complaints if you don’t work that fast, even if the new task is something completely different and takes more time.

    • Bazell@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Real. Especially if we assume that reward(salary) usually doesn’t change.

  • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    One more reason I love working for myself. I got my shit done and dont have to be anywhere else? See you clowns im going to the house

  • BilSabab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    you never forget the moment someone spells it out for you. i used to work in local newspaper - and it was always a wild goose chase type of thing. You work fast because there is always some shit happening. Then i switched into marketing and started doing copywriting jobs. One day i finished the assignment in like an hour and the lead came to me and shared some wisdom “nah, you need to make some revisions and the revisions are SEND THIS SHIT FIVE HOURS LATER, HAVE SOME DIGNITY”.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It generally doesn’t pay any better than just scraping by with minimum effort.

      Also, it really does pay to be a hard worker, it’s just someone else that is getting paid for your hard work.

    • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Depends on the company… when you don’t have stupid management, they know that you can work faster because of your know how of processes in place at the company, that relearning that stuff to a new guy costs more money than pay you more salary.

      That is way, in my country, it is normal that salaries go up the longer you stay and the older you get.

      I guess our social structures helped to get here, like workers right laws and a unemployed “insurance” where you can register as soon as you hear that you get fired (you have multiple month (depending on how long you already worked at that employer) until the work contract is nullified). You will get about 80% in salary, but you have to proof that you are searching for a new job and you have to take one if you get one. Not doing that results in days without money from that “insurance”.

      So this takes the pressure from the workers on how they talk with employers depending their salary.

      • Paulemeister@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        If your wages don’t go up with at least the rate of inflation, there’s an effective paycut every year

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Anything less than 10% a year, I switch jobs. The switch then brings a bigger raise.

          This is what I did anyway, now the job market is so shitty I’d be willing to stick out an extra year or 2 at an otherwise great employer even if the raise is not enough. Gives you a different kind of bump for the next switch because now you’re no longer an annual job hopper, you might stick around for 3-4. Gives you a bit of edge in the eyes of at least some bosses.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I gave my oldest son (12-yo) this talk the other day. Hopefully he took it to heart.

  • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    I slack off all the time at work. I just got my annual performance evaluation and found out. I am one of the top performers in my department. All that tells me is that I need to spend another hour or so a day playing games.

    • jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      For years and years I’ve gotten high performance reviews after feeling that I’ve done at best a mediocre job all year.

      I almost feel like I need them to finally give me a bad review. Tell me that they notice how much I’m slacking off and tell me what they want me to do instead!

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    You always have to complete your work. Anything less will result in unemployment.

    But the employment contract probably doesn’t say how fast you need to complete your work.

    If you’re done early, take a break and scroll on your phone for a couple hours, then send in your completed work at the end of the day. No need to tell anyone you’re finished, just go about your day looking busy.