• otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Microsoft applied a data-driven approach to find out which features to add now, which features to add later, and which to completely avoid.

    WHAT DATA?!

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        If they were using that data, then they would have included features people actually use in 10. Or maybe they’re just doing the inverse of whatever the data suggests.

    • Madrigal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Two data points: What their intern could do with React; what their intern couldn’t do with React.

    • imecth@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s Microsoft, they have all the data. And quite frankly it doesn’t surprise even a little bit, i doubt even 5% of people moved around the taskbar, people are just ready to hitch themselves to every bandwagon they see shitting on Microsoft.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 hours ago

        In that case, based on the roughly 1.5 billion Windows users, that’ll only affect a mere 75 million users for a feature that’s been there since Windows 95.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The equation they are thinking of, though, is “will the cost of those who actually quit using Windows outweigh the cost of building and maintaining this feature.” Funnily enough the inability to move the taskbar is what finally pushed me to Linux full-time, but the overwhelming majority will complain and stick to Windows.