• Cyberwitch_7493@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s kinda like comparing universal healthcare to individual payer for-profit insurance. One rewards everyone as a universal system with consistency (at least in theory) and the other rewards only rich people.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The government provides

        Except USPS is completely self funded, and does NOT use any of your tax dollars.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s an excellent point, but it is still a government service.

          Being administered by the government, self sufficient, and mandated to not make excess revenue just makes it a remarkably easy to justify service.

    • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why they oppose universal healthcare here in the US – they wan’t access to special treatment.

      What they don’t realize is they can still have Mommy’s Super Special Boy™ access, since even in a system of universal healthcare, there’s still a demand for private practice.

      So really, it just boils down to them hating poor people and other marginalized groups

      • bilboswaggings@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also universal healthcare can afford specialized equipment because the amount of people they would service is higher than the profit driven hospital

        Rather than the current system of specialized equipment still having to make profit so treatment costs increase

    • prayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except you would be very upset if your Uber eats took 3-5 days to arrive, as a postal system does. The cost is because it’s an entirely different product, an on-demand courier system. It’s closer to comparing universal healthcare with having a doctor on retainer (if such a thing exists).

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fuck Doordash, fuck Uber Eats, fuck Skip the Dishes. These greedy motherfuckerswant me to pay a delivery fee, a “convinience fee”, AND up charge me on my food, and act like triple dipping into my pocket isn’t a fucking crime. Then they have the gall to tell me that waiting an hour and a half for my food while my driver sits in a random-ass parking lot to receive luke-warm food is acceptable delivery time and service and ask for a fucking tip.

    And worse, no one wins! The restaurants hate it because they’re paying fees out the ass and receiving hate for the delivery services failures, the driver’s hate it because they’re not being given a fair wage, and the end consumer hates it because they’re paying literally 1.5x the cost of already inflating food prices! The only winner is corporate of whatever company you’re using, all to save you a, what, 10-15 minute drive?

    Fuck em’, I will hop in my car and go pick up my food every single day of the week. I’m never too lazy to tell a bullshit service like those to go fuck itself.

    • spiderjuzce@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a former driver I agree. I always feel bad about the tip thing but gas is so expensive and the apps pay like shit despite charging so many fees. And knowing that restaurants also pay a fee meaning the apps get MORE money is even more infuriating.

    • abk16@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder if there could exist a solution for services like these, but decentralized, as to cut out the greedy middleman as much as possible. I mean, lemmy sort of is the application of this concept. Sure, there’s still costs with running servers etc., but the protocol regulates much of the interaction.

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The company (Uber, Instacart, etc) is basically:

        1. An app for drivers/shoppers.
        2. An app for consumers.
        3. The servers to facilitate communication.
        4. A subcontracted call center in India for support and customer service.
        5. A third-party payroll processor.
        6. A handful of administrative people and techs to keep it running. Plus some shareholders to take the money.

        So not counting drivers and contracted services, it’s practically a small business. Seems easy enough to emulate.

  • Null User Object@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand why so many people can’t just go get their own damn food. Uber eats hasn’t been around long enough for you all to have forgotten what you did before, has it? How did you survive back then?

    • wlsnt@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Once a month I get home from work so tired that nothing in the world will convince me not to go home, order a pizza and wait for it while laying on the couch. I deserve that and I will do it, no matter how much “back in the days” you people throw at me, I’m busy and tired

      • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could always order the food when you’re leaving work, then pick it up on your way home.

        • wlsnt@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          For what, 10 euro less? I’d rather go directly at home earlier and wait in my underwears, money is meant to be spent

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why use Uber eats why not just call the place directly and have them deliver it? Uber eats takes a large chunk of their profits or they over charge you.

        • TurboDiesel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Some places still do their own deliveries, but most in my area ONLY do UberEats, to the extent that they’ve cut their delivery staff. The only consistent holdouts seem to be the Chinese places.

        • z500@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because Uber Eats delivers all over the place, and a lot of the restaurants I would order delivery from usually have delivery areas that I’m outside of. All the one way roads and the shit parking basically put me off of going anywhere downtown.

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When I know I’ll be too exhausted to go out and grab food, I make sure to get it on the way home so there’s no extra drive or leaving the house.

      • Perfide@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’d said anything other than pizza I’d give you slack, but you’re a damn fool wasting money doordashing/ubering pizza. Order from them directly, it’s cheaper and the restaurant gets bigger profits.

        • wlsnt@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the goalpost moved a bit here. I still order trough their website (if they have it) or call

      • pukeko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks to COVID and work from home and smartphones and Teams/Zoom, I’ve gone from an hour commute each way to a constant stream of meetings, texts, emails, IMs, etc. that must be addressed immediately, from 8am to 6pm. I don’t think the “back in my day” folks fully understand how much more people are asked to do now. I once obliterated an older colleague when he complained that youngs these days don’t put in half the hours he used to. I was like “Um, you used to go to the print office and wait four hours for prints to come out, take them back to the office, proof them, then take the documents to the courthouse and file them in person. In the same time, I’m responding to 100 emails, reviewing 20 documents ON MY PHONE, conducting 3 conference calls, listening to 2 coworkers’ breakdowns, and drafting, reviewing, printing, proofing, and submitting the documents you used to sit and wait for.” To his credit, he said I was right and I never had a problem with him again.

        All of which is a long way of saying that, sometimes, more often than I would like, I can’t just “go to the restaurant” because of time or because I’m no longer commuting. For all their problems, the apps mean that I’m eating fewer frozen pizzas and more poke bowls and salads.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everyone survived. We all survived before the internet too. But the world changes. If I’m injured or disabled it’s a great option. If I’m sick, maybe I don’t want to expose everyone to what I have.

      There are a lot of valid reasons to use it beyond “lazy”.

    • BearJCC@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except for people without cars and the walk to restaurants is dangerous. Except for invalids. Except for people who work at companies with rules about not leaving your post. Except for people quaranteening. Except for…except for…except for…

      • HerrVorragend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you sure you are not working on a pre-civil-war cotton farm?

        12+ hour days with no lunch break does not sound feasible in the long term.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you are an office worker just take your whole lunch. By not taking it your just helping enforce the informal rule of not taking lunch.

      • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you work for Elon Musk? If so get a different job. Are you making a shitload of money? Is not, get a different job. If yes, spare us your crying about delivery fees. Are you Elon Musk? If yes, fuck you. If no, get a different job. I mean you sound miserable and have no life. I’d rather be homeless than live like that.

          • UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m so sorry man. I hope you find some happiness or at least less misery sooner rather than later. I’m about your age, closed my business a little over a year ago (covid stuff) and while I spent most of the “free” time working on renovating our house I’m at a point where I’ll need to start looking for a job. I’m not thrilled with (or perhaps dreading) the idea.

      • mommykink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        No offense man because it sounds like you were conditioned into this over years, but you sound like a massive bitch for putting up with that.

    • Kerred@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I felt a better question is why so many people with transportation don’t get their own food.

      I am fine with driving anywhere so I think in the past 7 years we only had delivery once. But we try to cook mostly at home nowadays

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, a few use cases, but it tends to boil down to convenience.

        Some people work from home, and don’t have time to go get food, nor cook anything significant between meetings, and they’re just tired of cold sandwiches and microwave soup.

        Spending however long traveling to and from the restaurant isn’t always a valuable use of time compared to whatever else you were doing.
        If I’m playing games alone or with friends, I’d rather do that than drive around for half an hour.

        If you’ve got kids, loading and unloading them into the car can be a chore.

        Or just plain “comfy, don’t wanna leave”.

        Delivery is a convenience that people like. Companies switching to a service with more fees that drive the cost up so high is annoying.

    • FierroGamer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m curious, do businesses not do their own deliveries anymore? I personally never stopped just ordering directly from the place I’m eating from. Couldn’t tell you how common uber eats and others are in my area, I just know I don’t use them.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of places have, yeah. They viewed the delivery staff as a fixed cost, and thought the services would mean they only paid a fee per delivery, making it a net savings.
        Hard to blame them, since that’s what they were told, and it sounds reasonable on the surface.

        • FierroGamer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, that’s interesting.

          Elaborating further, small businesses here usually contract a delivery business instead of hiring delivery personnel, I think they just arrange the cost of the delivery instead of a fixed cost, so it’s basically no impact to the cost of the business.

          Not a perfect system, but at least small places can do cheap delivery without jacking up the prices.

          To be clear, I live in a corner of Argentina, even if that sounds good, we have other problems lmao.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, what ended up happening is that the services increase the cost of the items the customer buys by a percentage, and keeps that cost. Then they add a delivery fee that they keep, a service fee, and a tip that goes to the driver. Then they pay the driver a small portion of the fee and markup. Overall they take about 30% of the total cost of the order.

            Then they treat the restaurant like a subsidiary and make them use their pickup app, and sometimes advertise a menu that the restaurant doesn’t actually offer.
            They also make it difficult to give feedback on the delivery itself, since they take any negative feedback and forward it to the restaurant.

            I got a credit for $50 from one of the delivery service, which got me a a normal lunch plate from one of my favorite places (usually $15), and a ~20% tip. Driver tossed the food onto my porch, making most of it spill in the bag, and their system had no way to say “the driver did a bad job”, “give me back the tip”, or anything like that. All I could do was say the restaurant messed up, which they didn’t.

            Needless to say, I don’t use them even if it’s free anymore.

            • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              As someone who used to be a Doordash driver, I had the opposite experience. I got angry texts because the food I delivered was cold (I received it at nearly room temperature and immediately put it in a quality thermal bag). It’s not too uncommon to be banned as a driver for reasons beyond your control.

              One time I got a deactivation warning for attempting to complete an order in a flooded area. It was already an hour late because everyone else was accepting and dropping the order. I got punished for actually trying.

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Maybe it’s just GrubHub then, or their UI and customer service is garbage.

                Doesn’t surprise me that it’s shitty on all ends, since I think the only people it benefits are “people who see marginally reduced delivery staff costs”.

    • mycelium underground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I got delivery from the restaurant. They do not do deliveries anymore. To ignore the fact that the landscape has changed significantly and just blame the people ordering is to miss a majority of the picture. Turns out life has nuance.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thought about doing Uber eats/grubhub one time when I had a meeting early in the morning, and I was out of coffee and breakfast items. Went to order my food. Food cost was 6.50, total bill was 20.50, and then it asked for a tip.

      Fuck that. I went hungry.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially city dwellers. There must be easily a dozen takeaways within half a mile of your house.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Socialized system vs capitalized system: The capitalist comes in and uses their venture capital to undercut the socialized system so that people stop using it. Once the socialized system loses interest and funding or are otherwise out of the picture, they they jack their prices up way higher than the original and because they’re the only game in town, they get to keep those record profits in effective perpetuity.

    • mcc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is just about efficiency. Postal (including UPS / FedEx) can plan the route ahead, stack parcels with as little space as possible, and deliver hundreds of packages in a day. UberEats doesn’t know when will order show up, doesnt know when will order be ready, it can deliver maybe 2 - 3 orders in a row, the route planning is just in time.

      Tell me how is this only explainable by socialized system.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        You literally explained why that’s the case in your comment, how do you not see it???

      • bedo6776@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Republicans helped the couriers prevent USPS from competing. The 2006 law they passed mandated that USPS had to pre-cover healthcare and retirements for the next 75 years, which no other organization does, and has put USPS in financial trouble.

        • madcaesar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          All those moron Boomers relying on the USPS for their medicine delivery were suddenly shocked service to bumfuck Alabama would have to be reduced. Yet they keep voting republican…

  • MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Delivery guy here! Don’t forget that the driver only gets $5 out of those $30. So fuck uber. And I take my bike when I want to eat, obviously.

  • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not only that but they’re also inflating the actual meal prices. I’ve noticed that the same item at the same place costs different when I go in. They also don’t care if it’s ann Uber order and you’re gonna get a half assed attempt

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it’s way higher because they take a big chunk of the meal cost too.

      Plus there’s all the shady “takeaways” that are just somebody’s house. I’m sure some of them are very nice, but I’m not playing rat shit roulette…

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s because they charge the restaurant as well, so the restaurant puts a higher cost on the food to cover it.

  • pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a combination of economy of scale and flexibility around time. The USPS sorts massive volumes of mail and packages, then delivers by the truck load. With food delivery, you get a piping hot meal delivered by a dedicated driver. That said, still overpriced by the companies.

      • Jonna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ups and fedex still frequently use USPS for last mile in many areas. USPS has a mandate to serve and maintain infrastructure in the whole US, and the corporations use that. So does Amazon of course.

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I don’t think Uber eats is worth it, and I love the USPS, there’s a major difference between the two: time. No one is having the USPS delivery their lunch.

  • satans_crackpipe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love watching people realize private courier services are expensive. It’s kinda gross watching them throw tantrums when they realize they can’t afford it.

  • pacology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s because of the greedy USPS unions. You are paying for their inflated salaries (which just stuff the pockets of their union leaders), theirs golden pensions, and Cadillac health cares. If we could just privatize it, the market will push the prices down because of competition.

    /s btw

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget wasteful government intervention limiting what the USPS can charge, and making it so it can take days for packages to make the trek across the continent, without even having the decency to amass stupendous profit margins.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    And that’s why I don’t use doordash, maybe if I was rich but, when you were counting every dollar, you can get your ass up.

    These days I don’t even have pizza delivered to me, I will get up and get that shit.

    The only time I have had it delivered lately, for a few times when I was too sick to get up and make my own soup so I just ordered some pasta from Domino’s instead. App makes it so easy

    • Misconduct@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The AC is out in my car and I live in AZ so I’m pretty happy to pay for convenience for a month or two lol. I can’t deny it’s a useful service I just wish the drivers and restaurants benefited the most instead of the scummy middleman