You must log in or register to comment.
52 weeks is mind blowing. They got it good over there. Almost like the government wants people to create families/communities.
I don’t support the American takeover of Greenland, but I fully support the Greenland takeover of America. Where do I vote?
Actually I have 6 weeks paid vacation 18% employer paid pension, but I’m a government employee. Danes in commercial industry only have 5 weeks and about 9% pension… Suckers
Pro tip for white people, because your colonizer indoctrination has made you blind to this:
No one that gets invaded by anyone ends up better than they started. Yes, that includes all the countries you’ve invaded too.
As a PoC who grew up in the West the colonizer indoctrination is directed at everyone here, not just white people. We’re just more likely to decolonize our mindset due to attachment to communities negatively impacted by colonial institutions.
Japan?
I generally agree, and I have the same mindset. So you can imagine how surprised I was when my Taiwanese friend told me how much better off Taiwan was after the Japanese occupation. Probably the only Asians with a positive opinion of Japan…
Their family probably came to Taiwan after the Japanese invasion.
Japan was notoriously brutal to the indigenous population, but most of the people in Taiwan came there in the civil war.
In fact, stamping out the indigenous culture has been an ongoing part of the post civil war Taiwanese government, and it’s only recently that the Taiwanese language has been allowed to be taught in schools.
I guess it’s only the case for the Mandarin-speaking population
Nice
Has anyone ever said that racism is bad even when it’s against white people? Just don’t do it to anyone as we’re all the same, and such?
Pro tip: just replace any color with a different color. If all of the sudden it sounds offensive to you, then it was offensive to begin with.
I now sincerely wonder how many people will come by to tell me that racism towards white people is fine because a group of white people were assholes, so we all must be assholes
The worlds tiniest violin has never stopped playing for the white folks subjected to what they think racism looks like.
This completely misses the point and no one thought that.
You need to talk to some MAGA folk.
Most Europeans and Americans believe this.
"If we just invade them and force them to adopt our ideologies for 80 years there will be so much natural progress.
And as payment for our contributions, we can monopolize all their their resources to our private companies where locals will work for near-slavery conditions."
Yes, that includes all the countries you’ve invaded too.
Even “women cannot become doctors”-Afghanistan?
Yes. Motherfuckering liberals still out here like, “We had to murder hundreds of thousands of your civilians to save you from yourselves,” even about a project that (entirely predictably) ended in complete, abject failure and left everyone worse off except oil companies and arms dealers.
It’s incredible how much this 1800s colonizer mindset lives on in modern day people.
That is the current reality of Afghanistan, yes? Is this before or after their most recent invasion by the West?
Maybe the region would not have stalled their progress so much if they weren’t invaded during colonization, cold war, and the US oil fetish.
So yes, even “sometimes slightly browner people” Afghanistan.
Wrong and very nonsensical question.
Rephrase it to “if Denmark acquires California”.
We are so down with all of this. Sign California up!!
That’s one of the reasons he wants the EU destroyed. We set a bad example. Things can be done differently, even under capitalism.
It would actually be the other way around, hence why Greenland will fight tooth and nails to not become part of the US.
One of the biggest reasons I do not want to join the USA is that I do not want to lose our healthcare.
I think his plan is to take all of that away from them.
Trump is upset all those people are happy. This will fix that.
CNBC is over the top insulting zionazis this morning. “The west needs US to control Greenland for its security”. When there is no pushback on the pure lie that China and Russia are about to invade the furthest place on earth to them, with the most expensive resource extraction, then there can be no pushback on invading any country, ally or not, because, while most countries have China as biggest trading partner, it is always a threat for them to move from number 2 to number 1.
The US is about to collapse. In Canada’s case the strongest basis for refusal to be a US territory (Statehood not actually on table) is the US’s huge debt burden. But quality of life healthcare/education system corruption, as Bernie points out, would make any states willing to become a Canadian province much better off. One path to US collapse is States escaping federal debt through secession and “irreconsilable differences” on fascism and Zionazi first rule warmongering.
But when colonies don’t push back on the main lie behind US wars (Venezuela had CIA lies about election fairness and legitimacy of governance. Iran propaganda is calling Mossad rioting terrorists peaceful protestors), the the colonies are just gaslighting their people in a “stages of grief” bribery delay tactic towards acceptance of a more perfectly subservient colony.
furthest place on earth to them, with the most expensive resource extraction
Really the valuable thing is controlling the shipping lanes between Pacific and Atlantic countries, then playing kingmaker about who can trade with who.
Which is why any talk about any of this from anybody is just a pretense. :/
really the valuable thing is controlling the shipping lanes between Pacific and Atlantic countries
The only reason Chinese or Russian ships would need to go anywhere near Greenland is to deliver to north east North America, which would by definition be welcome travel. Arctic route between Asia and Europe goes through Russian waters. Closer and friendlier to China, and Chinese ships dominate world, and can pick up goods from rest of Asia.
Right, they don’t need it for themselves. USA and any other power would use it for a convenient bit of force projection, preventing 3rd parties from consolidating power outside of their block. So, say Venezuela wanted to ship stuff to the Philippines. Around South America is dangerous, Panama can be expensive, but arctic is more and more open and quick, so theoretically these example countries could find some mutually profitable stuff to bring back and forth to each other.
US can get a tax or otherwise frustrate any deals if they control that shipping lane. The Alaska/Russia choke point is contested and I’m not sure who has better control on that area.
US has seized control of Panama canal this year too. The ice to the north of Greenland has never been clear (yet). A path through Canadian waters opens up for 1 month or so per year. Russia coast clears out more often, and for about 2 months. Venezuela to Asia definitely wants to use Panama canal next door. It’s just slightly longer through cape horn than Canada passage.
We really should drop almost all trade/travel boarders between Canada/United States/Europe/Australia and New Zealand. Have one large economic zone. The US and England are the stumbling blocks to this.
pass on open trade/borders with US, their lack of regulation and standards on food means most of what they produce is garbage and/or potentially contaminated. Not to mention simply flooding the markets with their crap. When Mulroney negotiated NAFTA, it crushed so many industries in Canada, and we’re really only starting to attempt to recover from that… Maybe the only good thing Trump has done is to galvanize us to make better trade agreements with other countries and not rely on free trade with the US.
Sorry but we in Europe don’t want chicken raised up in filth so that it must be chlorinated and even then still has much higher levels of salmonela, beef with hormones affecting the growth of young people (and making the meat shit) or chemicals allowed into public use under the principle of “it can be sold until proven bad” rather than the principle “it has to be proven not bad before it can be sold”.
In other words, we’re fine with our higher life expectancy and better health outcomes and don’t want to suffer the consequences of shit American-style “regulation”.
Dropping European trade borders would be horrible, especially with America: stuff isn’t more expensive to produce in Europe because Europeans are shit at growing/making them, they’re more expensive to produce here because we actually have consumer protection standards which have costs to be obbeyed rather than the Free For All of America (and to a lesser extent of most other Anglo-Saxon countries) were pretty much everything goes for maximum profits for corporates even at the cost of fucking everybody else.
This is the problem with creating a meaningful trading zone right now … trying to get the U.S. to meaningful participate and move forward.
UK is an extra special Mi6 corrupt theocracy, but Biden’s US proxy war on Russia was a war on Europe and nordstream. Essentially strengthening the colonial status of an isolated Europe. This paved the way for Trump to extort them harder with tariffs as first round, and liberating Greenland from NATO is purely for direct missile/airstrike potential on Europe.
Sure, one path to western sustainability is free trade/travel among partners. But from US perspective, collapsing the colonies for extortion power and GDP boosts is an attractive delay tactic for next election cycle, when all colonial governors political capital is from CIA/US election determination, and will support US rule over them harder.
Avoiding confronting US empire lies directly is done to sell CIA narrative to the colonial indirect slaves. The west’s problem is that democracy itself, and its supposed values, is a lie. It’s only a colonial empire meant to extract tribute from the colonies.
Actually many/most people working for the government in Denmark have 6 weeks paid vacation. Even ones in low wage positions
Honestly this is just a stupid post. Why the fuck would it mean that? It would mean they’d lose those things. Trump has never given a shit about taking things from people.
Its just meant to be provocative and show you what Americans are missing out on.
Particularly it’s meant to peel away at American exceptionalism mythology. The US really only excels at two things globally, finance and war.
Trump has never given a shit about taking things from people.
He stole Chelsea’s trophy
He stole childrens virginity, dignity and future
You don’t understand much do ya
What exactly am I supposed to understand here? In what world would the outcome Bernie is suggesting even happen? It just makes him look stupid. If he’s attempting to point out Trump’s terrible leadership, no one is doing anything about that either so it just makes him look weak. It’s just another “gotcha” tweet while the democrats sit on their hands. This shit does nothing to help anyone.
Read the room, Bernie. Not everything is about your favorite social programs.
Trump has been saying that life would be better for Greenlanders under the US, and Bernie is pointing out that it absolutely would not be. The US is garbage and can’t even take care of what it already has, let alone a place it only wants so it can feel better about itself.
All that is clear. Love Bernie, but this messaging at this moment is still shit.
How so?
Always gotta be some jackass who “totally supports progress” but always seems to find a reason why it can’t happen just yet.
You need to ponder that orb more, wizard.
Weird take on the situation.
White people have the idea that invading a country means that the people there are now better off because it’s what they believe happened to all the brown people in the countries they invaded.
As a white person, I can absolutely say that every invasion we’ve done has royally fucked up the ones we’ve invaded.
I might not be the target audience though.
Neat. What are you doing about the rest?
Fck me, Defeatist Bernie, a sad sight to see.
