• whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s kinda loud in here, did the headline say ‘piece of shit fuckface Trump gives Canada reason #563 to stop trading with the US and increase trade with Europe, China, etc’?

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I was walking past the 7-11 the other day and the manager came out and forced me to buy a slurpee by gunpoint. USA! USA! /s

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is just robbery, we weren’t able to make our schedule and modified the price. “$27.7 billion in cost – up from its initial $19 billion.”

    Yet expect them to just give us $7 billion dollars because we failed to meet the contract?

      • Archer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Now I want a short story where the Mob accidentally hires the most effective project manager ever

        • Thassodar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          There’s actually an anime where a corporate worker gets summoned into another world because they need him to use his efficiency to get their shit together.

          It’s called “Headhunted to Another World: From Salaryman to Big Four!”, and it’s pretty good.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Give us money or we will attack you” is generally not something you say to an ally you want to keep. Trump is literally insane, trying to start WW3.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        No, I definitely read.

        Canada doesn’t want to pay for the massive cost overruns. The US said “fine, but we’ll have to shore up the NORAD system by sending OUR fighters into YOUR airspace as necessary.” If there is no agreement as to how that occurs and the US does it anyway, that is an invasion. Quite literally.

        • Pika@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Part of NORAD already allows both Canada and the US to enter each other’s airspace in the interest of dealing with threats. This is an existing negotiation.

          What the ambassador is stating is that if Canada does decide to backtrack on the program (which full disclosure I agree with because they failed to meet their deadline and the cost overrun is through the roof), In order to “prevent gaps”, they would increase their f35 presence Which is also why they referenced that they would need to alter the current NORAD plan.

          This is a quote from one of the sources that the article uses for its claims.

          “NORAD would have to be altered,” U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra told CBC News in an exclusive interview at Luke Air Force Base in Arizona. He says the United States would likely need to purchase more of the advanced fighter aircraft for its own air force, and would fly them more often into Canadian airspace to address threats approaching the U.S. “If Canada is no longer going to provide that [capability], then we have to fill those gaps,” said Hoekstra.

          The Posted article cherry-picks the hell out of its sources to try and make a mountain out of a mole hill.

          The entire article could be summarized with “US ambassador states that if Canada backs out of F-35 deal, US will need to increase resources to fill the gap” But instead of doing so, the author decided to make a title that makes it indicate that the US ambassador is threatening to invade Canada over it. Disingenuous reporting.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      NORAD already has shared skies provisions. US jets can fly into our airspace as needed to intercept foreign attackers. We can do the same with them.

      None of this constitutes a threat, despite Hoekstra’s weird, fumbling attempt to deliver it like one.

      He basically said “If you don’t give us your business, we’ll have no choice but to protect your airspace even harder!” Oh, wow, scary. No, please, don’t do that.

    • DanceMomsSavedMe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Would be great if they shot them out of the sky when they crossed over.

      I mean, they weren’t supposed to be there. So who did the act of war first?

  • hector@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Canada would be dumb to go forward, everyone knows the US has kill switches in their gear and now might hostilely engage canada, perhaps to steal territory, and otherwise has talked of invading other nato countries like in Greenland.

    In which case the US could brick all of the gear they sold them. It’s already bad enough, Canada has to buy from EADS or whomever builds their air forces, I would not trust the UK either at this point, they are properfucked by their own neoliberal type politicians in labour, that have done more damage than the tories the past couple of years…

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      everyone knows the US has kill switches in their gear

      Because you read it on Lemmy?

      There is no kill switch, that would be stupid and a huge vulnerability. The “kill switch” is a metaphor for the supply chain required to keep the jets active. If the US stopped sending parts, the jets would be useless after a few sortis.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s a longstanding rumour, I read about it in the times back 20 years ago, and elsewhere later, you haven’t heard that before? There’s another, that the US has kill switches hidden in the majority of the world’s computers, they send a signal to it and it bricks.

        I believe both of them, you are free to believe the taxoplasmosis parasites that tell you the government wouldn’t do that what do I care.

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s absurd. All it would take is one disgruntled worker to post proof about it. And foreign powers would pay handsomely for a spy or hacking group to provide details. It’s well known that countries like Russia, North Korea, Israel, etc. all have highly talented hacking groups on their payrolls. If they had the slightest feeling that the US implemented such kill switch technology then they’d all be doing everything they could to exploit it. It’s not worth the risk.

    • azureskypirate@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If the Americans put kill switches in gear they sold to Canada, that is a reason for Canada to NOT buy more gear with kill switches. Instead, Canada should resecure their supply chain of military equipment.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah that was what I was saying too. The US is the enemy now. Sadly but there it is. Maybe the new supreme leader will make nice, but I doubt it.