• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    I’m using Rocknix on an android handheld and it feels so powerful to be running 6.18 mainline kernel with all the modern features I want despite having to build stuff from source since the package manager only has a small list of stuff mostly meant for networking (Entware).

    Even though its in beta for my device (AYn Thor), it works so well after only 4 months of development that I’m genuinely reaching the point of perma install and removing the stock Android install from the device.

    I would pay cold hard cash for an OEM to do the same with PostmarketOS. Throw in proper open source kernel modules and use Steam’s upcoming waydroid fork for Android compatibility, and then throw that sucker in the market and watch Google try to litigate it out of existence.

  • hellomoto@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We need alternatives to big tech. They’re reigning in and locking everything they can down, and the states are loving them for it as it solidifies their ability to control us.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 minutes ago

      What we need is a good linux phone that is affordable, has hardware that isn’t slow, and isn’t over sold to an annual pre-order.

      Sadly, if the first two are true, the third one becomes an issue.

      What we need is a large company to see that is a sign of huge pent-up demand. Apparently, HP and Dell are both talking about switching to Linux as their default OS for desktops. Once all the desktop manufacturers find themselves in the business of selling hardware with Linux on it, either mobile manufacturers will copy, like Samsung, or the desktop folks decide to make their product smaller.

      What everyone has wanted from the beginning was a desktop in their pocket. The amount of time that no one has produced that despite major demand, and the amount of development that has gone into building any other stack, just feels like willful suppression at this point.

      Is there some government somewhere telling large-scale manufacturers that they can’t build something as free and open as a desktop that isn’t at least the size of a laptop? Because it actually takes less technology to make something that’s open than something that is closed. And there is just as much appeal for the consumer to not restrict them.

    • dismay3915@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      Those who have the expertise should start contributing and working more on Linux for mobile. Postmarket has made great progress it just needs more manpower

  • eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Fuck you Google. I won’t do further updates on my Pixel and the moment I run into an issue I’ll move operating systems or phones if required. Half my apps don’t come from Google Play and I don’t want the developers to have to register with Google for anything.

  • TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Starting in September 2026, Android will require all apps to be registered by verified developers in order to be installed on certified android devices.

    I wonder… I know that we used to mod our consoles due to the limits of ‘certified’ official software.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    On the one hand, google is obviously evil, and it’s intentions here are undoubtedly evil as well. On the other, I do think some kind of verification of developers should exist. Just not in google hands. But who. There really isn’t anyway to create an organization that could be trusted to do this. And of course, the user should be able to chose to install apps from an unverified developer.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That’s how it works on Windows already. You buy a cert from a third party vendor so your setup file can pass Windows security checks and doesn’t show a big warning to the user when they open the setup file.

    • Mohamad20ZX@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Couldn’t agree more Especially when the Pine Phone Pro is improving every year since its has came out and with Posh shell and Waydroid nothing will stop Linux from succeeding in the modern era

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        As far as I know, it is still reliant on the whims of Google through shenanigans with AOSP, and of course having to use a Pixel.

        Linux offers a more solid and independent foundation, and while it is less polished yet, to me it’s the only real way out in the long run.

        Still, GrapheneOS is a big step in the right direction - hope it wouldn’t come across as me being against the project.

        • nile_istic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          They’ve signed with an OEM (still secret atm, but the best guess seems to be Motorola?) who will produce the first flagship GrapheneOS device sometime this or next year iirc. Supposed to be revealing the manufacturer next month. That’ll at least take some of the Google dependency by having to use Pixels.

        • fishy@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yup, if enough people switch to graphene big G will fuck them over. Exiting entirely is the only long term solution.

  • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Fuck, I don’t have the money to replace my phone. I probably wont by September either. Too many expenses.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    In the meantime port linux OSs to be easilly installable on Android devices

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Feels a lot more interesting to just pick up a feature phone, and use it as a hotspot modem for a laptop.

  • linule@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Time to popularize Linux phones. I read that the security model is lacking, but especially given that Android is Linux too, it shouldn’t be too difficult to catch up. The EU is also interested in tech independence, so that could be one of the sources of funding. And there are a few viable early projects, like Ubuntu Touch and Sailfish.

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There need to be enforced of competition law here. Companies aren’t going to voluntarily support a platform with few users. Users aren’t going to move to a platform without critical apps.

      We live in a dystopia were you have to have the banks app to do online banking even on your desktop. You can’t charge your car without an app. You can’t navigate your car without a map app that has traffic information. Etc etc. I want FOSS alternatives to all these, but there isn’t and Google could take even having a FOSS platform at all.

      This something we need regulators to fix. It is a politically problem, not a technical one.

      America screwing up trust should wake up Europe to dealing with American tech monopolies. Now it’s not something just nerds and economists complain about, it is a geopolitical problem.

      • linule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Fully agree, there should be regulations, temporary at least, that require/incentivize critical companies to make a mobile Linux version of their apps, as well as strategic funding and incentives to make the platforms viable. We as citizens should contribute too, increasing pressure for this to happen, spreading the message, becoming early adopters where possible, submitting feedback, contributing to development, etc.

        • jabjoe@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          We need to support political groups fighting for us, not just think in terms of technology. In the UK it is OpenRightsGroup, maybe the Greens party, in Europe there is the Pirate Party, Greens, Free Software Foundation Europe, and more. We should be trying to get politicians into this.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Sailfish is not very alive. Ubuntu Touch too.

      But honestly yes. I think the problems are mostly in hardware support.

      • linule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        The political problems driving the push for independence are fairly recent, so the current state is unlikely to be extrapolable.

        There are devices using these operating systems that are also gaining popularity, like Jolla, Volla and Fair phone.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Never could. Power of thousands of paid developers against a few. That’s like finding all needles in a haystack, and power determines the size of that haystack and the amount of needles.

      You can’t use something that cost that much to make and expect to divert from what the producers intended.

      • Yliaster@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        That’s obvious, but before, we could use GrapheneOS and F-Droid etc to defend it ourselves. I’m not expecting Google to help, just hoping the resistance has something up its sleeve too.

        • jabjoe@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I’m basically am doing exactly this. But I’m only on GrapheneOS as I had to compromise on some closed apps that refused to run on LineageOS. GrapheneOS means I can compromise on Google a bit without being completely compromised by Google. The market and geopolitical problem remains.

  • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Not sure how I should feel about this, if I should support the cause to keep android “open” (when it’s everything but), or if I should be happy that this piece of shit OS finally shows it’s true colours and people (including me) will finally be forced to find an alternative or stop using this trashware all together.

    And hopefully developers finally get serious about GNU/Linux phones.

    • sonofearth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Until Linux Phones get good, we are seeing a very rough sail ahead. Or just hard fork Android ig if it’s a logical option.

      • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I understand, but there’s a good argument that android is the reason why GNU/Linux phones don’t get good.

        The death of android as an “open” platform would put some pressure to actual develop an alternative.

        • sonofearth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It won’t die. My country alone will have almost a billion Android users and those cheap Androids are all they can afford and know.

          • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I meant that it would die as an “open” platform, so power users would be compelled to stop using android.

            • sonofearth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I hope that but power users don’t dictate the technological development 🥲. Everything is made for people who want it “user-friendly”.