Due to a (now former) admin of the instance anarchist.nexus calling for a member of our team, as well as anyone else they call a zionist, to be murdered, the instance has been defederated.

We’re currently discussing how we will proceed with this situation and whether it will affect lemmy.dbzer0.com, which is mostly run by the same admin team, notably excluding the person who used to be on the anarchist.nexus admin team.

We will share further updates once we have them.


Update 2026-04-22 23:25 UTC: anarchist.nexus federation has been reactivated.

We are still discussing this matter, but there is currently no point in keeping anarchist.nexus defederated while lemmy.dbzer0.com is federated.

  • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Hey there, Kaplan.

    So, this is quite clearly now just a witch hunt by you.

    For anyone else who is curious, this is what happened.

    A user by the name of Luminous was an admin on Anarchist.nexus. They banned MrKaplan from a community for posting zionist apologia. Luminous also had ‘Kill all Zionists’ as their display name. MrKaplan took this as a personal death threat. Instead of speaking with any other admin from Anarchist.nexus and reporting the behavior, MrKaplan instantly defederated from Anarchist.nexus.

    In the next couple of days, Kaplan messaged other users/admins of Lemmy about the defederation and suggested defederation to others as well.

    It was then posted about in the Piefed matrix channel. This led to PugJesus, someone who I abhor, actually saying something I agree with.

    The conversation moves elsewhere. One bit of input that stands out is this. It will become important in a second.

    In basically every situation, Kaplan is told that they’re wrong or overreacting but Kaplan cannot see past the ‘death threat’ to their own mistake.

    So, I messaged Kaplan. Conversation goes on and one thing is made clear

    Kaplan never spoke with anyone and ran all of this off of an assumption. There was inconsistencies in how the different people felt because they were different people and not one organism. What was individuality instead came off as obliviousness and Kaplan took it personaly. See what I mean by it became important? Kaplan is talking about a ‘lack of moderation’ over something that Kaplan literally never reported or talked to anyone about and instead just made assumptions over.

    @Ruud@lemmy.world, this is what you’re backing. You went out of your way to make an instance that wasn’t going to be reddit and you went ahead and re-created Spez, an admin who personally takes out their own feelings on anyone that they don’t like and is trying to control the narrative of the entirety of the fediverse.

    Friendly reminder to everyone. Check back a couple of months ago on this community and look at the post about JordanLund. A moderator who was openly lying to the admins in public but the admins took weeks to decide to do literally nothing. But a single user on another instance meant that MrKaplan was able to defederate it all.

    This behavior from Kaplan is, quite literally, the reason that I left lemmy.world.

    Don’t believe me? Here’s the last message I sent Kaplan during the Jordan garbage.

    Funny. Jordan requires a ton of deliberation, reasons in the TOS, and you’re all ‘working on it’ but a single user says something you don’t like so instant defederation?

    Edit: Quick note but every other post on this community has been featured. This one isn’t. So you’re making an announcement but you’re not really announcing it. Any response to this, Kaplan?

    Edit 2: Kaplan is just blatantly lying. As demonstrated above, Kaplan has literally zero evidence of this claim other than things “feeling odd”.

    Edit 3: Serinus joined the thread 15 minutes ago and now a number of my comments are being removed for ‘misinformation’ despite the comment above proving them to be categorically true.

  • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    From what I saw, the ‘call to murder’ was someone having kill all zionists in their username, and that only makes sense as a real call to violence if we’re supposed to take everyone’s username seriously and literally. That would be a very weird world to be in, as then we’d have to accept that we’re reading posts written by Star Trek characters come to life, inanimate objects, and various bodily fluids. Without evidence of something worth taking more seriously, at best this looks like the admin team doing something silly, and obviously certain groups of Lemmy users will interpret it less charitably and as the LW admin team being pro-genocide. Neither is a good look.

    • Yliaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Surprise surprise Lemmy isn’t entirely different from Reddit in that:

      • It kills a community over the name of one user (yes I’m aware it was an admin)
      • Said admin had beef with this user, which they conveniently left out in their post description
      • It’s got shameless hypocrisy too where calls to death from zionism is acceptable but not the other way around

      For the record, I am not for calling anyone’s death as that’s not my thing, but have some consistency hypocrites. Smh.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        The site structure can only do so much when what you hate is certain users. The idea of lemmy is that other instances can be free from the unjust actions of users on one instance such as this one-- which is a success.

    • ModCen@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t agree. I don’t think people should have usernames of the form “kill all [certain type of people]”.

      If someone condemns Israel’s actions against Palestinians then okay. But I don’t think it’s right to call for the deaths of people you disagree with. Even the worst criminals should arguably not be killed with the death penalty, but instead imprisoned for life.

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        During an active military conflict, killing isn’t applying the death penalty just for disagreeing with someone, it’s typically the only remotely viable way to stop them committing whatever act they’re in the middle of. When that act is genocide, killing them is almost universally the only moral action as anything else, even if it still stopped them, would take longer and in doing so let more genocide happen.

        If they’ve been stopped by other means, e.g. economic sanctions make genocide too expensive to continue, then many genocidal acts carry the death penalty under international law. That’s ethically dubious, but it’s far from the biggest problem with anti-genocide law given that it’s blatently not actually preventing genocide. If the username were just apply international law to zionists, then it’d still be promoting killing people.

        It’s also misleading to reduce zionists to certain type of people, as it conjoures up ideas based on inherent identity that are obviously bad to persecute before more directly comparable types of people like murder enthusiasts actively committing murders and refusing to stop despite pressure to. No reasonable person would say armed police were unjustified in shooting someone who was stabbing someone else after they’d been already told to drop their weapon. Not all zionists are actively killing people, but they are all calling for it to be allowed to continue, otherwise they inherently wouldn’t be zionists.

        • ModCen@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Surely it isn’t necessarily true that every single zionist supports bombing Gaza. “Zionist” apparently means:

          someone who belongs to or supports a political movement that had as its original aim the creation of a country for Jewish people, and that now supports the state of Israel

          Surely some people within that definition support the existence of Palestine alongside Israel, and they oppose any harm done to Palestinian civilians. For example there is an Israeli charity, B’Tselem, which apparently supports Palestinian rights, although I don’t know much about them.

          • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Supporting the state of Israel, at a time when it is actively committing a genocide, is supporting the genocide. Genocide should be a red line that forces people to stop supporting its perpetrators, and anyone who doesn’t withdraw support once a genocide starts must be, on some level, okay with it.

            Existing within a state doesn’t automatically imply support for it. Most people have at least something they want their state to stop doing, and that can and does include existing. It’s hard to say that a charity issuing statements that Israel is an “apartheid regime”, “no longer a democracy” and “committing genocide” supports the state of Israel.

            There are also plenty of people who, if asked, would say they support the state of Israel, but wouldn’t support genocide, and not see that as contradictory because they’re under the impression that Israel isn’t committing a genocide. What they’re supporting isn’t the state of Israel, it’s a hypothetical alternative state of Israel that doesn’t exist. If (pretending for a moment that the USS Enterprise wasn’t decommissioned in 2017 and was currently in the Strait of Hormuz) someone who mistakenly believed the United Federation of Planets was real expressed support after hearing in the news that the USS Enterprise had fired on other ships, it’d be most reasonable to just ignore them rather than assuming their opinion of their imaginary state was relevant to what their opinion of the real United States would be.

            • ModCen@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              There are probably people who support the existence of Israel without supporting what Bibi and his government have done. Opposition politicians in Israel, for example.

              Surely in any country there will be people (such as opposition politicians and activists) who oppose the current government’s actions, without wanting the state itself to be dissolved. Even in very authoritarian countries like North Korea there might be such people, although of course they would have to keep their views private, due to near-certain persecution otherwise.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      3 months ago

      a lot of lemmings like to dog whistle by saying they would not shed a tear if all zionists or anyone not protesting against them were killed

      because they are cowards

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am confused. If the admin in question is no longer an admin, what’s the need for defederation?

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Okay, but was the person accused a Zionist? If so, why not eject/defederate/ultimatum them instead?

    I’d prefer a federation of rabid anti-Zionists than one of Zionists. It’s the Nazi bar analogy, because EVERYONE should be against Genocide.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      So long as they’re also anti-Russian imperialism in Ukraine (genocide) and anti-Chinese imperialism in Taiwan (also would be genocide).

      I notice many of these tankies suddenly have much to say defending these countries with atrocious records and blood on their hands as well.

      Edit: Case in point. If there’s one Xi/Putin supporter at a table…

      • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        What about anti-Taiwan imperialism in China? Because Taiwan claims all of China and the 7 dotted line.

        Ukraine supports Zionism because that is an easy to to get support from America.

        You cannot be against Zionism and support Ukraine at the same time.

        • Skavau@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          What about anti-Taiwan imperialism in China? Because Taiwan claims all of China and the 7 dotted line.

          Taiwan has to maintain these heritage claims because repudiating them would effectively be de facto repudiating the ‘one-china’ agreement and equivalent to declaring independence, which China would take as a casus belli. It’s a farce. No-one, Taiwan included, genuinely believes that they can get any of that land, nor that it would be desirable to pursue it.

          You cannot be against Zionism and support Ukraine at the same time.

          This is silly. So you assume every single person who supports Ukraine defending themselves against Russia is automatically pro-Israel?

          • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            3 months ago

            Taiwan doesn’t have the military power to take over mainland China, but they certainly want to.

            The difference between a peaceful person and a harmless person is a peaceful person has the strength to cause harm but chooses not to, but a harmless person doesn’t have the strength to cause harm, even if they wanted to.

            Taiwan wants to cause harm, but isn’t capable of it. That doesn’t mean they’re any less imperialist than China. Don’t forget they fought the communist party with everything they had and would do it again if they could.

            You cannot support a Zionist and not be a Zionist yourself.

            • Skavau@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Taiwan doesn’t have the military power to take over mainland China, but they certainly want to.

              Based on what do you claim this?

              You cannot support a Zionist and not be a Zionist yourself.

              Supporting Ukraine defending themselves against Russia has nothing to do with Israel.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Taiwan doesn’t have the military power to take over mainland China, but they certainly want to.

              bwahaha… no, they don’t. it would ruin the taiwanese economy to attempt and has never been a consideration. hilarious

    • MrKaplan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      we are not zionists. if you call for zionists to be murdered and then call us zionists that is a call to murder us, despite a lot of people claiming that it’s “just a harmless political slogan”. this is normalization of mass murder. we do not tolerate genocide or other murders either, which is also an accusation that a lot of people are throwing around here. accusations of zionism, mostly from dbzer0/AN users, are constantly thrown around against people that they don’t deem to be radical enough.

      • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m sorry Kap, but you are 100% a zionist and you don’t get to argue that. You simply don’t get to claim you aren’t one when your actions speak otherwise.

        When it comes to the whole ‘murder all zionists thing’, this just kind of proves the point that you are a zionist in the first place. No one who isn’t a zionist would fly off the handle into such a petty rage like you have. There’s also the fact that you’re silencing voices, refusing to allow people to speak, and using collective punishment on the entirety of dbzero and anarchist nexus due to the actions of a single fucking individual.

        Yeah. You’re a zionist Kap.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          3 months ago

          When it comes to the whole ‘murder all zionists thing’, this just kind of proves the point that you are a zionist in the first place.

          No it doesn’t. Luminous outright called Mr. Kaplan a Zionist, and drew a Swastika onto the logo of the FHF. I responded elsewhere in more detail but wanted to isolate this point here: you seem to assume that Mr Kaplan felt called out due to a guilty conscience or whatever, but that is not what the facts of the matter show in this situation. Luminous very clearly called for the actual irl murder of everyone in the FHF.

          And then, in their own words, preemptively banned MrKaplan.

          There’s also the fact that you’re silencing voices, refusing to allow people to speak

          Setting aside for the moment how Luminous abused their admin powers to do precisely that, and also btw did it first (Mr Kaplan’s actions were taken in response to those of Luminous), yes that is exactly correct: the very many many many calls for outright, actual, irl murder coming from AN are now silenced, not visible to the users of LW.

          Anyone who wants to can still read them ofc, but LW provides that moderation service to anyone who would like to remain on LW and receive it.

          Not all of us are spoiling for a fight 100% of the time, and sometimes people just want to browse some memes once in awhile, ya’know? Without having to wade through calls for murder I mean. The rights of everyone on AN are nowhere being curtailed, i.e. they still retain full rights to speak as freely as they wish, but LW is done platforming such from them, echoing and amplifying and storing those messages on their machines the same as all of the other content on the Threadiverse. Like hexbear, AN got too problematic to have to try to figure out which communities were safer for consumption vs. which were too problematic, so since the numerous calls for violence were not being toned down and even being led by their admin team, the entire instance was defederated from. That’s not a witch hunt, that’s a response to very clear extremist rhetoric. LW users should not be forced into having to read MAGA-like language, even the leftist version that is supposedly on the “other side” (yet seems to behave so identically to it that I can barely tell a difference anymore).

          • Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Luminous acted as a user/moderator. Kaplan acted as an admin.

            You are not taking any of this into account. I’m not wasting my time with this because, I too, elborated on this elsewhere.

        • chloroken@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Lmao they permabanned me for this, and then days later unbanned me. I didn’t ask to be unbanned. This is what regret looks like.

        • MrKaplan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          3 months ago

          In an ideal world where this could happen in a peaceful way? I wouldn’t see an issue with that.

          In our current world where it seems that the only way for it to exist is one involving mass murder? Absolutely not.

          • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ok so you don’t think israel has a right to exist and it’s existance requires mass murder, that’s good to hear!

            Do you think that this state should be dismantled then (through force since that’s what’s apparently necessary) to be replaced with a free palestine “from the river to the sea”?

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        You have a user in this exact topic defending israeli genocidal actions that minimize the nekba claiming most palestinians left with no pressure. I reported multiple of his comments. You did not remove a single one of his comments. In fsct, besides one or two lemmy.world community, zionist posts never get removed. You may not be a zionist but you surely tolerate it

  • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    the tea is all over yepowertrippinbastards, and i gotta say i agree with the prevailing sentiment. mrkaplan is making a bad move, but its indicative of a pattern of politically based moderation that pervades .world.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      3 months ago

      but its indicative of a pattern of politically based moderation

      No, you know what, keep the typo; it’s correct.

      • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        it’s not a typo, but I can see the syntax is unclear

        despite pretending neutrality, .world bases it’s moderation on political motivations

        edit:

        love when they try to poison the well and encourage dog piling. shows they are truly grounded in good faith. /s

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          despite pretending neutrality, .world bases it’s moderation on political motivations

          Do you wanna just get the “muh freeze peach” part over while you’re at it and save us some time? You just say they’ve feigned neutrality but then never back it up because a) you know it’s provably horseshit, and b) it doesn’t matter because you’re trying to separate things into political and apolitical categories that fundamentally do not exist and – as we all know from conservatives pulling this schtick for decades – only hurt the victim by silencing what you determine to be “political” speech and actions.

          Yes, it’s political that an instance admin called for another instance’s admin to be killed; yes, it’s political to defederate from them in the sense that everything about social media and group dynamics generally is inherently political; no, I don’t think it being political is a bad thing like you’re pretending to. I’m sure you haven’t raised a squeak whenever an instance would choose to defederate from a hateful, far-right cesspit; the reality is that the person feigning care about neutrality here is you.


          Edit: Oh, they moderate a Jill Stein community. Their unhinged behavior below makes way more sense now.

          • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            wow, this screed doesn’t at all debunk the accusation of overt pro-zionist moderation

            edit:

            jill stein is anti Zionist, too

            • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Dropped that whole “political” thing like a rock, didn’t you? You never said anything about “pro-Zionist moderation”; your only two comments that I replied to were whinging about “politically based” and “political motivations”, and now you’re pivoting with no acknowledgement, because you’re fundamentally arguing in bad faith.

              If your problem is their specific politics, you can be upfront about that, but you deliberately chose not to, and you’ve proven discussion with you is not worth anyone’s time because of it.

              • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                21
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                zionism is obviously a political position, and the mods have feigned impartiality about it while moderating anti Zionist sentiment away. you are splitting hairs and it’s unbecoming. your shitty attitude is also damaging your case here.

                • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  17
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  your shitty attitude is also damaging your case here.

                  Tone policing too – as though I need my argument to be compelling to somebody who intentionally layers their argument under conservative-style misdirection, and pretending as though failing to mince words to your liking hurts the credibility of my argument.

                  Edit: Policing my tone out one side of your mouth while remarking “[the admins aren’t] going to suck you off” out the other is so pathetically expected.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Zionism is bad, Ethnonationalism is bad, Murder is bad, War crimes are bad, Genocide is bad, Racism is bad

      Many of the people involved in this conversation are toxic assholes who need to touch grass.

  • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is honestly pathetic. If the admins want to have an argument at least leave everyone else out of it. Defederation should be an absolute last resort not your first port of call when someone disagrees with you

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      100%

      It’s always admin drama that leads to this. Look at any of the major instance defederations and it is always a disagreement that isn’t resolved because the egos of the admins involved almost immediately turn the conversation into ‘agree with me or else’ instead of any kind of real dialog.

      In this case, the person calling for murder in their username was removed as an admin so the issue seems resolved.

  • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Have you considered raising this with the admin team before defederating?? Or with your userbase?? I don’t wanna hear shit about hexbear is aUtHoRiTaRiAaAaAn when they have a vote before defederation instead of just throwing a tantrum and reflexively defederating a whole-ass instance because of personal drama between two admins.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yup, this guy gets it. This decision is bad enough that I think the admin who did it should be removed. Someone in a position of high authority should be held to a HIGHER standard, not a lower one; if there is significant distrust, even if it’s from less than a majority of the userbase, they should be removed.

    • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, the great thing about Lemmy, Piefed, and MBin being federated is there really isn’t a reason not to try different servers and services till you find the one you like best. Not like post history and karma mean anything here. Besides it’s nice having a backup account in case your main instance goes down for maintenance or gets DDOS’d. No reason not to have other accounts. Unless you’re doing it for ban evasion, or harassment, vote manipulation, or similar reasons ofc.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except at some point if many instances defederate many other instances you cannot get the whole picture from any of those. Destroying the whole point of federation.

        Federation is a strength if played right. If played wrong, like defederating a whole instance for a personal issue between admins, federation becomes a weakness and a deterrent for people who just want to have some fun to want to join or stay in the fediverse.

    • qevlarr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Is it actually moving instances or just making a new account on another instance? I’d want to take everything with me including history, is that possible?

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Unfortunately, no. Fediverse allows you to cross-comment on other instances from your “home” instance you’re logged into, but you have to make a whole new account on another instance to move.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lol, The FAF takes weeks of deliberation, and a public vote to defederate feddit.org and we still get shit about being “authoritarians” or “manipulative”. L.W. just YOLO defederated an anarchist instance on the flimsiest excuse and…crickets.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    So wait you’re just defeterating an entire instance just because the arch Zionist of this instance is having a bitch fit? I’d rather just get rid of him. Can we do that instead?

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    We’re currently discussing how we will proceed with this situation

    Block the mod on your personal list, don’t defederate?

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly, with comments in this thread being removed by mods and the delays and prevarifications over this defederation, I’m starting to think LW is run by children.

    Do better.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh no someone said something controversial on the internet, what ever will we do?

    Remember when world nuked the piracy community lol.

    Unless that instance is causing brigading, what’s the point of banning over a former admin with such a tame username.

    • 白浆领主@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The Lemmy.world team are Zionists. It is a direct death threat against them. We all know internet names are legitimate. MrKaplan has had to go into hiding due to fear for his life.