• Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      Or simply run dirty energy as a last resort. You don’t need to, and shouldn’t be, dependent on a single energy source.

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Pffft … batteries are for toys … my delusions tell me the following pictures are fake because I say so and I don’t need to prove anything because jesus tells me petroholics like me are always right:”

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s great and all, but I’m still waiting for it to be affordable to install my own so that it can also be a whole-house uninterruptible power supply.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 month ago

          Obviously it depends on your use case but at least for me having an uninterruptible power supply for the maybe one day in 4 years that I have a power cut, it isn’t worth it unless the installation cost is negligible.

          I think for most people putting a few panels on the roof is probably good enough. Especially if they end up getting an electric car in the end which can do reverse charging.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Those aren’t batteries, batteries are black and gold and round. Those things are evil woke liberal batteries and so don’t work.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Wouldn’t it be better to have them underground with vents?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      All you need to do is put a solar panel under a lamp post, infinite electricity.

  • RandomStranger@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 month ago

    but experts say coal emits carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, and several other pollutant
    What the hell is this crap reporting. It’s not like this is a contested fact or an opinion.

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Much of North America has enjoyed electricity steady enough not to think much past don’t wiz on the electric fence.

        That was a multi-generational achievement.

      • Meron35@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sadly from personal experience, no, the general public does not know that coal power plants work by burning coal to boil water, and are horrified at how trashy the concept is.

        High-key a great way to persuade them to support renewables. Associate coal with the image of people in underdeveloped countries burning fossil fuels in their own homes to exploit their own preconceived biases.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Alternatively you can depict it as filthy and Victorian. Something that was once an improvement, but these days really only belongs in a museum. You can compare it to child labor and accurately point out that the Victorian era was grimy and disgusting because of how much coal was burned then.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    Surprised the Pedo-in-Chief doesn’t immediately halt this so he can get more money from the coal lobbyists

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Tell me you didn’t watch the video(s) without telling me you didn’t watch the video.

          • ptu@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            The video is one and a half hours long so I don’t blame you, but it had the same point as you

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Really? You don’t know youtube or how to copy a link without clicking on it? Wow!
            If you’re 5 you probably shouldn’t be using the internet but i can ELI5 you on how to, although i don’t think the topic will interest you.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              In their defense, most of the time when someone just posts a YouTube link on social media it’s a complete waste of time. Video is very slow to get to the point, that’s why we’re reading!

              • 0x0@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                This particular youtuber is know to be “slow”, but thorough in the topics he covers.
                This particular video has an “extra” 30m, you can stick to just the first hour.
                The TL;DR is that solar makes more sense than coal in the murican Midwest.

                • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  “solar makes more sense than coal in the murican Midwest” - Thanks, I actually don’t need a 30 minute video for this.

              • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                You can copy paste the transcript (or download the vtt subs with yt-dlp) into any AI and let it hallucinate a summary for you.

              • Commuting4375@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Clicking on a link without knowing the website it leads to?

                most of the time when someone just posts a YouTube link on social media it’s a complete waste of time

                Completely different arguments. This is moving the goalposts

            • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Have to sit through ads just to see it’s a 90 minute video with next to no context of why I should trust this person with my time. In a era where most info is at best wildly ignorant and at worst maliciously misleading?

              • conartistpanda@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                Good point.

                (1:20:24) We are clearly living under leaders who have a completely different understanding of reality than the rest of us do, and they are so high on their own supply that their followers will believe abject lies. Renewable energy is only controversial because they made it so. And they don’t want you thinking through the reality which is free energy from reusable materials, as I’ve just explained. They have donors who still make money selling you fossil fuels, and so they do not want you thinking about how much you’re spending and how we have the opportunity to stop.

                (1:27:13) Be that helping hand. Organizing networks are popping up everywhere because those of us who managed to grow up into adults, who care about people other than ourselves, are not going to stand by and let this illegitimate government run by petulant toddlers, violate the Constitution and the very principles that make America great. My fellow Midwesterners in Minnesota have made me so proud. Stay strong and keep teaching us how to be brave and resist this horrible chapter of our history with steadfast, nonviolent defiance. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a lawless group of masked thugs terrorizing our cities and neighbors for daring to look not quite white. Anyone who has any understanding of history will know that it is happening here. And if you believe that to be true, then you should also believe that ICE must be abolished. And if that freaks you out, I’m going to guess you’ve been told the people who say that want completely open borders. Some people do, but most people simply took the poem on the Statue of Liberty as meaningful and think this country should open its arms wide and provide a legal pathway to immigration. Just as our ancestors did on the storied Ellis Island. It is our decades long inability to have true immigration reform occur which put us in this place and what we’re doing today to fix it is clearly wrong. It is a racist ethnic cleansing operation happening on the pretext of childcare fraud, which was already being investigated and dealt with by the state of Minnesota, but which some terminally online weirdos somehow got wind of and spun into this madness. And that madness is being perpetrated by agents of the state and endorsed by Republicans. Republicans could stop this now, but they won’t. and the reason I know we absolutely can abolish ICE? I am older than ICE. In fact, I’m older than the entire Department of Homeland Security. That agency was created post 9/11. And in retrospect, the folks who thought “Homeland” Security sounds kind of ominous were apparently correct. We need to throw this system out and start over. And so, yes, I believe ICE must be abolished. There is no reforming that agency of thugs. It has to go. And the lawless criminals hiding behind masks who are violating the Fourth Amendment day in and day out, need to be prosecuted for each and every one of their crimes. I will be voting in the primaries and I sure as well hope my representative, Sean Casten, starts saying that with clarity and conviction. Sean has been one of the people who understand the realities of renewable energy, and has been a long time advocate of it, so we’ve been pretty aligned, but we’re not aligned on everything. And my patience is starting to break. So if you made it here. Thank you for watching. I hope we can bring some sanity back to this country and that we can start calling lies what they are.

              • TimothyOilpants@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                I refuse to believe that anyone using the internet to get smarter doesn’t know who Technology Connections is…

              • conartistpanda@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                He called you names after pointing out you can copy a link without opening it. What about that? You implied doing that is impossible:

                Clicking on a link without knowing the website it leads to? By someone who doesn’t bother to say anything about the link? 😆 😂 🤣

                Those are the emojis of someone who’s confidently wrong. Just admit you didn’t even bother what the video tries to say by reading the comments.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve posted a TL;DR somewhere on the thread already and I don’t recall Alec mentioning “capacity factor”, but maybe he referred to the same concept by a different name.

        • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          You dint know what capacity factor is? Is the main criteria used for comparing different types of power sources.

  • Cleisthenes72@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    The MAGA response “No it didn’t! No it didn’t! Fox and The Anointed One didn’t say so! Fake news! Fake news!”

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is actually a pretty major indictment on the US. Coal is one of the worst most inefficient fuel sources for power generation, virtually every other fuel source is an improvement including incineration of food waste.

    A good test of how efficient fuel is is to see how much of it you still have left after you’ve theoretically burnt all of it. The fact that coal smoke is black is a pretty good indication of how bad it is. You’re throwing away a good chunk of your fuel.

    • Nurgus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      I love the trivia that there’s traces of uranium in coal which go up with the smoke - coal is worse than nuclear in terms of radiological pollution.

      • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        When looking if it was feasible to convert coal power plants to nuclear, we found out that most of the coal sites have more radioactivity than is allowed for a future nuclear site

      • VoodooMischief@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is an often misquoted fact. The study that compared coal and nuclear was only studying air pollutants, and obviously the steam stacks from nuclear reactors don’t have as much radionuclide pollutants as coal. However, the study did not look at other sources like wastewater - which is where most radionuclide pollution from nuclear reactors comes from (along with other sources like spent fuel, casings, and moderator rods).

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure, but I assume it’s easier to collect wastewater for proper disposal than the air pollutants.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Solar is more efficient. The corporations will move over to the most efficient power source regardless of what the administration may or may not want. Continuing to use coal just to appease Trump is stupid.

      Anyway they can just lie and say that they are using coal for everything, it’s not like anyone is going to check

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Bold of you to try to make a distinction between this admin and corporations. But of course, they’ll hedge. My point is that they do so uphill and slowly, without the research, subsidy/tax incentives and media praise that would typically accelerate progress towards such an obvious next step

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Companies tend to be international. No matter what they might be telling the Trump administration in the United States if they’ve got solar desires in other parts of the world they’re going to pursue them without having to prostrate themselves at the altar of idiocy. Hell, they might get praise in other countries for pursuing solar.

          So they know the economic benefits and they know their benefits would be doubled if they were operating in the US as well.

      • TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The current problem with mass solar plants is that they lose a good chunk of the stored energy before it is distributed to where it goes. Obviously far better than coal, but the panels need to be at the source of where they need to go, hence why roof top solar panels on buildings are great idea. Wind power is a lot more efficient, but it isn’t like we can all plonk big windmills on our roofs.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Solar energy isn’t magic. Power efficiency losses are the same for all power generation sources.

  • Snowwdropp@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Great, but that doesn’t mean less coal is being burned. The article says the share of coal in the total power of the US has been halved over the last five years but again, how much less coal has been burned? That’s the important part.

    Only speaking in parts tends to miss this:

    On a global scale, energy sources cumulate, they don’t replace each other.