This is getting out of hand.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    So that they can get pictures of license plates tied to addresses to sell to repo companies so that the tow truck can come get your Hellcat.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Obviously the reader should confirm this for their own jurisdiction but there is no law against either removing or covering up your car’s plate(s) as long as you’re parked on your own private property. Just gotta remember to uncover them before you head out because that is illegal.

      Car covers are also an alternative if you’re a renter assuming you aren’t required to have a parking pass or plates visible for parking enforcement.

      • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Anyone wanna build smart licence plate covers? Like it either rolls up or flips up to hide the plate.

        Maybe actually have it just flip down your plate when parked to obscure it. I would say power tinting to obscure it but technically its illegal to cover it most places.

        • toynbee@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          “Smart” in this context wasn’t as much of a thing back then, but The Transporter had a similar option.

          • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Interesting but I just meant flipping down not completely making it look like no plate. I would say tie it to the ignition/power button so when off it flips down or up depending on what is less obvious. Like some cars have a bump above the plate that would be less obvious going up meanwhile trucks have ledges or tow hitch that would make it less obvious flipping down.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        there is no law against either removing or covering up your car’s plate(s) as long as you’re parked on your own private property.

        Not inherently true- most places ban having “unregistered” vehicles on residential areas, and if they can’t see a plate when they’re looking to cause problems, they’re going to claim it’s unregistered and make it your problem.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ah my neighbor battles this every year lol, they have to prove the vehicle is actually functional. It becomes more of a battle then you would think if you have the will to fight them…

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    The only way to stop or reverse this is to get conservative capitalists out of our government.

    I mean aside from literal bloody revolution, which some people say is the only way. And, as much as this may be true, it will take a lot more than what has been happening so far to incite that sort of action, so the next actionable step is to vote for and support socialists to push back against the filthy rich and their corrupt cronies that infest our government at every level.

  • __init__@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    Our garbage trucks already have been for years… I learned that when I got an “overloaded bin” fine, with a video of my neighbor’s bin being dumped as “evidence.” I had to do a dispute and make them reverse it, not because I care about a dollar or whatever insignificant fine amount, but because, like… fuck off with that shit, you know?

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s enraging.

      I’d consider organizing a campaign to leave bricks/debris on the sides of roads on pickup days and throw their garbage on the front door step of whichever gov’t body made that decision.

      Where I am there is considerable legal precedent preventing surveillance like that.

    • Prathas@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, absolutely fight for principles if you have the time and energy to. That was messed up.

  • Mommy Longarms@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    …can yards and house fronts for code violations: overgrown grass, illegal dumping, peeling paint…

    I’m sure nobody’s going to get outrageous fines due to an AI’s false positives.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I genuinely hope it does nothing but drown people in false positives, to the point where the people who put this idea forward have to leave the state under witness protection.

      • Mommy Longarms@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Unfortunately, it’s probably just going to end up fucking a bunch of innocent people over, and the people who put the idea forward will take a nice vacation before returning to their life as normal.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          on an unrelated note, a pseudo-napalm is relatively easy to make with common everyday ingredients. You know, just for intellectual curiousity and nothing more.

  • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s the announcement. It isn’t the story.

    AI writing detected in an article about the evils of AI. It’s like rain on your wedding day.

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sorry, I can’t continue or provide the next lyrics of a copyrighted song. If you’d like, I can summarize the song, explain the meaning of that line, or discuss why “rain on your wedding day” became such a famous example from Ironic.

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    [Flock] run what it calls convoy analysis to flag vehicles that keep turning up near each other.

    There’s an interesting article written back when it was revealed that the post office was recording the envelopes of every piece of mail it handles and what kind of data they could extrapolate from it. [If you’ve mailed a letter at the counter in the past few years, you’ll know that they bug you if you haven’t put a return address on the envelope.] Anyway, it’s called “Finding Paul Revere” and I found it an interesting read.

  • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The idea of putting Cameras on City Vehicles and using AI to find problems, including Code Enforcement issues, is a good one IMO. The problem, as the article notes, is what that data is going to be used for in the future. We used to call this a Slippery Slope argument but the past 10 years have proven that if data is harvested that it will eventually be misused; it’s some kind of parallel to Godwin’s Law that I am going to coin as “Flock’s Law”.

    In this specific instance Flock’s Law tells us that the authorities will inevitably start scanning the photos / videos for people in order to track movements, the Police will be in the database stalking people, and you’ll start getting tickets for over-filling your trash can.

    Meanwhile all people really want, and what won’t happen, is someone to come by to get that absolutely jungle of a lawn mowed, fix a broken sidewalk, replace a missing street sign, or move the damn boat / camper / trailer / junk car that has been parked in the street for the last year.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    Of all places, the fucked up red run Florida Oblast. I thought the MAGA nutters were all about “freedom.”

    • Brewchin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Freedom (like free market, etc) means the freedom for corps to do whatever they want. The exact opposite of what Adam Smith meant.

      Classic Murica: redefine a specific term and claim it’s in line with the original definition. If you can’t beat the facts, play with the terms behind those facts. Win!

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    I guess they won’t be satisfied until we are all wearing mechanical suits that will prevent us from doing anything “illegal!”

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      or have cameras in your own house monitoring your every move. like that dropout/collegehumor skit, where republicans have cameras in every move to monitor as a “thought” police.

      • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        you already have that: your TV, your tablet, your securiy camera, your baby monitor, your doorbell, your neighbor’s doorell, your goddamn router from the ISP. your phone.

        the game ended when Elon Musk got Trump the votes he needed. there is no freedom any more. all we can do is resist until they disappear us.

  • M137@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    The American defaultism is so fucking tiring, it’s such a constant “here’s this thing that’s only a thing in the US but it’s written like it’s global”. There needs to be a rule of at least having (US) in the title for posts that use whatever title they link to.

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Isn’t one of the most common rules in news communities that the title must be exactly the same as the title of the article? That’s why this happens to you. News sources don’t always say “oh, yeah, this is just for the US, BTW.” In their headlines.

      • pheelicks@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Rules have a purpose to serve. They can be changed and allow certain tags.

        Or let’s say we leave the title and make it a [US] flair or marker or however that could be named. Not sure if lemmy already has that functionality.

        Just saying there are possible solutions to this.

  • Joelk111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Not to be that smug guy who drives old cars, but I can fairly safely gaurenteed my vehicles, from '84, '85, '93, '06, and '07 are not spying on me.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’ve said this in other threads, but you are gonna see the value of old shitboxes skyrocket as they will be the last haven of privacy on the road… Until they make it illegal to drive any vehicle that doesnt record you constantly via audio/video, require a breathalyzer to start, plus 2 blood samples, a piss sample, and a Semen sample/Cervical scraping before allowing you to turn the key and enter the roadway/

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The problem with old cars is that, eventually, they will die, and all we’ll have is the surveillance boxes, no alternative.

      This is part of why it’s so vital to keep the fight for surveillance-free vehicles, even if, for a brief moment, you are still able to avoid part of this monstrosity.

    • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah but if everyone else’s is, you’re getting tracked too. Just like Facebook does. It’s dogshit.

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Because I’m a gearhead and I like them.

        I would’ve hoped that was obvious… So, to be more specific, if that’s what you were asking:

        • '84 Oldsmobile Delta 88 Royale
          • This was my grandpa’s, so it has sentimental value.
          • No one preserved these, so it’s also super unique.
          • I’ve always loved the old land yachts, there’s nothing like driving a couch down the freeway.
        • '85 Honda Shadow VT500C
          • It’s a good little motorcycle. Reliable, cute, and slow enough that I’m less likely to kill myself on it.
        • '93 Subaru Loyale 4x4
          • This is probably the least rational, considering I own another station wagon, but I really like it. It’s easy to work on, super practical, fuel efficient, and comically slow. I take it offroading and camping often. It also isn’t worth much and doesn’t cost much to keep going.
        • '06 BMW Z4 3.0i
          • It’s a sports car. It’s fun, and probably one of the better deals in the category these days.
        • '07 Volvo XC70
          • I’ve converted this into an RV with an office, bed, and kitchen. I go on multi-week-long trips in it without needing to take time off of work.
          • It’s also been heavily modified by myself to be quite offroad capable.
          • My small community of viewers on YouTube also love this thing, so I can’t really sell it haha.

        I’ll also mention that all of these vehicles combined are worth like 10-15k, which is signifigantly less than if I owned a single “nice” vehicle, and I haven’t had to go into debt to own any of them.

        I’ll also also mention that, even as a gearhead, I generally agree with the fuck cars movement and whatnot. I want better public transit and such to get those that’d rather not be driving off the roads. Plus, driving in cities suck, I’m relieved to leave my car at home or a park ‘n’ ride and take transit into town. For how “free” America supposedly is, people sure don’t have the freedom to not own a car.

        That ended up being rather lengthy, but what’d you expect asking someone about their hobby…

        • Prathas@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Wow, max $15k combined? Sounds like junkyard findings or something! You must be really handy, I take it.

          • Joelk111@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Maybe a bit more… I was talking about current value as well, not what I paid.

            Hard to say what Grandpa’s car is worth, it could be worth thousands to the right buyer, but it’s also pretty heavily used. The Subaru is worth about 2k. BMW about 7k. Volvo about 3k. Motorcycle about 1.5k. They’re just not expensive vehicles haha.

            I am fairly handy, yeah, not a professional by any means haha, but I can get quite a lot done.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    My car doesn’t even shift for me and has no cameras or cellular radios, nor any software that can make internet connections.

    If she’s spying on me she’s being quite clever about it.