• lemmygarden@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            yeah, pedophilia, indoctrination, cult based on lies, and shame culture that is based on lies and falsehoods. probably more. but child care is so expensive.

              • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                12 days ago

                NGL, that’s gotta confuse the hell outta the rare MAGAt “thinker”—even their coprolithic idol doesn’t offer childcare at any level.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Depends how good you are at playing the part, without actually doing any of the bad stuff. Churches vary, but often, it’s one of those places where the tribal symbols are more important than actual substance, so taking advantage is very possible.

            See: Whatever super-rich televangelist. If you’re doing something similar, because you’re poor and can’t afford childcare, there’s an argument that’s not even bad, then.

            Edit: Although, if OP means Sunday school or youth group specifically, the kids are going to be exposed to some shit, which you’ll have to manage. An adult telling you you’re going to burn alive, and that’s good, isn’t really fun for an 8-year-old.

            • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              without actually doing any of the bad stuff.

              They all indoctrinate children, and while you did comment on that shared tradition later, it’s worth highlighting as unavoidable —not to mention heinous as it attacks the unarmed and generally trusting minds of children. 😢

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                12 days ago

                Yeah, I’m not actually sure what OP meant, now. If your kid’s in Sunday school, aren’t you going to be spending time in the service, anyway? I guess if you just dropped them and ran, it’d be hard for them to say no.

                Maybe you could get away with that when they’re really little. Once they’re school aged, leaving them unsupervised would be better than in the hands of whatever bunch of church ladies, and the Catholic church has a whole other layer of reputation.

                From their perspective, we’re the ones trying to hide our children from ideas that are correct and vital, so they can justify it to themselves. Trying to defend the standard, evangelical version of hell is harder, which is why it’s good to bring up.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      12 days ago

      Let me know how that goes.

      Is there an Intro to Furry Guide and a FAQ?

      Are there classes I can take to get Furry Certified?

      Do I need to engage in sexual activity which doesn’t align with my current non-furry orientation?

      • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        12 days ago

        Furries are typically nonsexual. It’s more often than not just roleplay for autistics.

        Source, autistic furry who doesn’t want to fuck in the extremely expensive fursuit

        • KittyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          12 days ago

          There’s 2 types of furries:

          I paid a ton of money for this fursuit, I don’t want to ruin it by having sex in it!

          I paid a ton of money for this fursuit, of course I’m going to use it for sex!

      • franzfurdinand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s a one question quiz, actually:

        Do you want to be a furry? Yes or no?

        If yes, congrats! You’re now a furry.

        I’m actually an asexual furry. So no, you don’t have to engage in any sex at all. I like the aesthetic and I’ve met a bunch of my friends through the fandom as a shared point of commonality.

        Probably the biggest question you’ll get asked as a new furry is “what is your fursona?” If you say you don’t have one, everyone will make a pitch to try to sell you on theirs. (psst Maned wolves are cool.)

        For a more in depth explanation, take a look at furscience. They’re an actual research institution studying the fandom.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Maned wolves are cool

          As someone who lives where they are naturally occurring, I can confirm that they are cool. There’s also a specific tree (lobeira, Solanum lycocarpum) that’s essential to their diet and needs those wolves to reproduce.

          • franzfurdinand@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            That’s awesome! I would imagine that the roar barks at night are probably the stuff of nightmares… unless you know it’s coming from those goofy ass noodle leg guys.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        I’m guessing people would be weirded out if they knew you weren’t actually furry-inclined, so it’s probably more down to being a good actor, if you’re just there to network. And then basic networking skills, after that.

          • Gonzako@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            12 days ago

            Yeah, I’m sorry I don’t really know the reference. It seems to be a TV series or a town in the US

            • myyass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Yeah it’s a big military/fbi town. The joke was the FBI removed the exemption of people who’ve had sex with animals. I never thought I would see that reading the news.

              • ClownStatue@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                12 days ago

                An early job of mine was in the FBI Academy cafeteria. Very familiar with the area. Forgot about the “loving animals” reference, so it took your explanation for me to catch the joke.

                • myyass@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  That’s pretty cool. My sister and brother in law are there now so I’ll be taking a visit there.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    12 days ago

    I feel like a lot of people involved in the hiring process are incompetent and shouldn’t be there. Like you have HR people who can barely use Word asking if you know Java or JavaScript

    • Hazmatastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      12 days ago

      As someone who briefly worked in recruitment, the amount of people interviewed by people who have no frame of reference for anything about the job requirements is astonishing. Some people may say “but surely not for the high-level positions-” No. Especially for those positions. Because people like owners and c-suites want final say. And guess who knows nothing about these positions. Them. They literally hire presidents and vice-presidents based on vibe. Technical positions see a lot of this, primarily because even a bad interviewee is going to know more about their job than an executive whose primary job is the “idea and vision” guy. Just spit enough jargon, laugh at their jokes and you’re in.

      For reference, that company had a head of maintenance who as a friend of a friend of the owners. He just delegated the whole time and hit on any woman he found half-attractive. Thought he was just an asshole until I heard that he had honestly asked a production manager which side of a tape measure was the inches and which was the centimeters. Guy gave a visual run-down on how to use a tape measure to him. The head of maintenance. And he said thanks, and that he’d post it in the tool shed for his staff to reference. It became clear that he delegated everything because he literally didn’t know about thing about his job. I would be surprised if he could point out a phillip’s-head. Apparently he had the same job at a nursing home before that. I shudder to think of why he may have lost that job.

      A few months after he got inevitably let go, he delivered my dominoes pizza. I don’t look down on jobs like that, but that felt good.

    • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yup I had a HR personally message me saying the person I recommended doesn’t have a certification needed for the job. They have that in a different state, getting it in the state the job is in is as simple as saying “hey I passed the same exams you guys take (it’s national), I’m registered and practicing in that other state, can I get approved here?” And they say “sure”. It’s small documentation and a bit of waiting period, but that’s shorter than the training period of the job itself. I said a bit about that but they’re like they don’t have it in this state. Which I’d understand if it’s just a way to say no without saying that person is not qualified for other reasons. Because most other openings I see in our industry gives the candidates 6months to get the certificate because it’s easy

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 days ago

        I need to find a better phrase than “cargo cult” but I see a lot of that at work. People who don’t understand why a system is the way it is become fanatical about doing it particular ways.

        Like, you have to do “file -> save as” into the directory. If you save it somewhere else first and copy it that’s NO GOOD

        • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yeah. I think sometimes it comes from using a lot of shitty softwares that only work with “happy path” so they like to repeat what works and won’t experiment (because that means repeated work).

          I have a lot of “we have to do it this way”, me: “this is better”, them: “we always do this way”.

          As well as, me:“hey it’s easier this way, I think clients will like this way, even if we do the original they have to switch eventually”, them: “no, they asked for this, we NEED to do this”, me: “can we ask?”, them: “…”, i talked to the clients and they were already thinking about the new one and had no problem, saved us weeks of work trying to back port an already existing solution

          • jtrek@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 days ago

            I just had a flashback to one of my first office jobs.

            They had weekly reporting that needed to be done, and someone non-technical had been assigned to do it. They had like gone into the database and copy-pasted records into excel, and the whole operation took a full day.

            I was like, “Hold on. What? You know you can script all of this, right?”

            Luckily my boss liked me, and let me go ahead. Changed the task into an hour, including making whatever charts and slide-deck management wanted that month.

            Though I do wonder if sometimes doing things badly is a weird pro-labor move- They get paid the same if they take all day versus an hour, so why bother speeding it up?

            • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 days ago

              I think that’s honestly how it goes. If you’re efficient and just get more tasks, or get called off for not working (if you’re done with work and doing something else), then you have to pace yourself. Lot if work I get is copy paste this from here to here that takes hours, I could have written an script to do all that in the time I spent cooy pasting, but then I’d be the only one who could do it again. Even though the next time it’d take 5-10 minutes

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      At past employers it has seemed to me that most of what the internal recruiters do is look back and forth between resumes and job descriptions and throw away the resumes that don’t have enough bullet points matching.

      And now we have AI that can do it even worse and even faster!

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Unfortunately the perverts I hang out with are largely programmers and nurses and I’m neither, which really kills my networking options

      • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Once in a while? Try weekly, more like. Echography is a killer of joints something bad. If you’re a massage therapist and know obgyn and midwives, you’ve got your market right there.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The suspiciously wealthy and poweful furries support more then the arts. Thank you for your community service my furry and scaley friends. The world truly rests on the shoulders of your suit.

  • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    I was out of work for four months spamming resumes on different job websites before a recruiter cold called me and got me in at my current place so can confirm. Out of five different professional jobs I’ve had, only one of them has been off of job search platforms :/

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    12 days ago

    D: state-run job websites for the unemployed. You don’t have to be unemployed to use them, nor a resident of that state. The listings are at least not scams, and you don’t have to pay anything to apply, but success at getting hired is still low.

  • RedFrank24@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’ve found that having an opinion helps in job applications, from personal experience. There’s so much AI garbage being thrown around in terms of job applications, so if you can throw in an actual opinion about something, especially if it’s tech related, then that might at least stand out.

    • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 days ago

      How do you put an opiniom on a resume? Or are you talking cover letter which at least half of hiring managers don’t even read?

    • kionay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      laid off a few months ago and I’ve been searching for another senior software engineer role in the US for far too long and have gotten to the point where I’m unironically considering applying to places with a resume that is just a few bold sentences about my aptitude as an engineer.

      Not because I think it’ll work, but because you just start grasping at straws when a decade of development isn’t enough to get past ATS and your resume looks like everyone else’s.

      What have I got to lose? I only even get denials 40% of the time anyways, the other 60% they don’t bother responding at all.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      I know my mother-in-law, and she knows everyone apparently. Excellent strategy on my part, having a sibling that got married. 40 years in the making that plan.

  • Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    Just to be the contrarian: my first job in my current industry was through a recruiter on LinkedIn. It got me an instant 50% salary bump and after a few years and promotions I was making double the previous job.

    My second job was… through a recruiter on LinkedIn. It got me an instant 30% salary bump and now after more years and promotions I’m over double the first job.

    This in in a country where I had immigrated 10 years prior. For me linkedin is the best social network ever.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        Always the recruiter initiating. As anyone working in IT, I get multiple messages a week, one in ten are relevant and one in ten of those are interesting, but I’m not jumping jobs every year, so it works in the end.

        Its really just have a complete profile, listing keyword technologies. In the meantime I have a few recommendations but I don’t think those make a difference.

        • theparadox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          How long has it been since you were recruited? I avoid LinkedIn, but I’ve never needed to look for work because my dad knew a guy and I proved competent when that got my foot in the door.

          Still, from what I have heard in the last year or so it has become, at least in part, a cesspool of scams and disingenuous employers wasting your time in their search for cheaper labor… both often powered by LLMs.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            First one more than a decade ago, second one about 7 years ago, definitely pre-LLM era.

            I still receive messages regularly and I don’t notice any difference from messages on the past. I answer one every now and then and it’s usually a real person. Maybe they are using LLM, but before that they just copy pasted a template and changed you name…

            • theparadox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              Are you telling me that a human sending form messages is in any way comparable to an LLM sending messages?

              What matters is that humans used to be involved. Now they just review the results at some point. You are evaluated, chosen, further evaluated, informed, and given answers to questions you might have about a job and the company offering it all by the LLM. Everything that might theoretically be handled by agents saves the company money and let’s them cast a wider net.

              Then you’ll be end up working as a reverse centaur for some rich kid’s startup. Sure, you can spend exponentially more time than the company does verifying things or ignoring, filtering through junk… but if you are desperate, unemployed, hopeful…

              Theoretically, at least.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                A human sending copy-pasted generic messages and an LLM sending copy-pasted messages? Yeah, I don’t care.

                Fortunately, linkedin unsolicited messages cost money, so there is no mass-spam, it’s in their own interest to keep it plausibly relevant.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      If i recall correctly, it’s more like tinder now (or as of 5 years ago - the last time I looked at it)