• TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

    Those are the exact words of the 22nd amendment. It’s explicit. There’s no ambiguity or room for other interpretations. Trump was elected twice, he’s hit his limit, that’s it.

    • Sumocat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yes, and none of that prohibits him from running for office again. The only prohibition is that he cannot be elected a third time. But here’s the thing: we don’t actually vote for President; we vote for who our Electors elect as President, and they are Constitutionally prohibited from electing Trump to a third term. If Trump runs and “wins”, the Electors cannot elect him. He can win 0 Electoral votes. Doesn’t matter what their States’ laws require because the Constitution is the highest law in the land… until SCOTUS rules the 22nd Amendment violates the 10th Amendment. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • benderbeerman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

      This is why is fun to own a whole ass supreme court:

      No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

      Words are fun for this guy

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It does specify that he has to be a person. Perhaps they’re going to argue he isn’t?

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          In a wild turn of events, he’s gonna change his name to Deborah and run as our first trans President, claiming the transition resulted in him being a different person.

    • GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It doesn’t matter what it says when neither courts nor law enforcement will enforce it. Looks like we’re running out of democracy boxes.

    • neidu4@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well, he can run again. It’s just moot, as he can’t be elected. If he were to get the most electoral votes, I gu3ss the runner up is elected?

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There’s wiggle room, he’s claiming a right to campaign. To run… He’s not saying anything about being elected.

      He doesn’t actually do the electing. That’s up to public, and the officials who are in charge of elections (who he’ll try to stack with loyalists). He can’t say what they’ll do.

      He runs, and if others elect him… Well… That’s the wiggle room.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s not wiggle room, it’s violating the Constitution. Not saying it can’t happen, but it’s not like that’s a logic loophole, it’s just not caring about acting illegally.

    • boatswain@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      So it sounds like there’s no prohibition against running, just against winning? Sounds like an easy win for the Dems.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It seems pointless to run in an election you are constitutionally barred from winning. But, Trump has proven time and time again he will do pointless things. If he tried running again and somehow he won, however, the constitution is clear: it’s a no go. He can’t get elected for a third time. That said, I don’t think that’s necessarily the point. I think the point is to create chaos and crisis. Hopefully he’s not around to run in 2028 so it becomes a moot.