Civilloquy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Veedem@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago

America's housing shortage explained in one chart

www.axios.com

external-link
message-square
32
fedilink
75
external-link

America's housing shortage explained in one chart

www.axios.com

Veedem@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
32
fedilink
Just a moment...
www.axios.com
external-link
  • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m the only person on my street actually in favor of the proposed multi-use housing/shopping complex a developer wants to build a block over from us. I can’t change the minds of all these old people. I’m pretty sure we’re just fucked until they all move out or pass on.

    • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      I heard some pushback on a plan for a mixed use development in an abandoned office park. The person had zero to do with the property, lived in a completely different area. But didn’t want it because “traffic”. Like pushing those potential residents to live further away was somehow more beneficial for traffic than putting them close to it.

    • cazsiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      We can just start our own municipalities somewhere. Where is the biggest question

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        With blackjack and hookers!

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      In fairness to your neighbours, it’s probably hard to be on board when all they probably foresee is increased traffic and reduced property values.

      • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Mixed use land developments increase property values. My neighbors believe urban myths and lies, so I’m not particularly inclined to be any more fair to them than I would be to someone who believes that vaccines cause autism.

        https://masslandlords.net/gentle-density-increases-nearby-property-values-evidence-shows-contrary-to-popular-belief/

        https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-02/does-affordable-housing-lower-property-values

        I own a house here too, ya know. I don’t share their misguided concerns. Yes there will be traffic. I believe we have reasonable options to mitigate that.

        But it looks like the rich, old NIMBYs are going to win this fight, and keep people locked out as always.

        • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh for sure, they’re mostly misguided, but not usually malicious. When housing is such a big investment people tend to behave very conservatively which means it’s lots of work to shift the needle…

    • Bye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Why are you in favor of it? They wanted to build one near me, and I think it would bring more people and more traffic into an otherwise quiet neighborhood. I think it would also take away part of the exclusivity of the neighborhood, and lower property values (or otherwise make them grow more slowly)

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        So you’re okay with the concept elsewhere just not in your backyard?

        • Bye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m ok with prisons and dumps and volcanoes existing, but I’d rather not live next to them.

          • crimroy@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Define NIMBY.

      • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Multi use land developments increase property values, and I would love to have some shops that I can walk to. Fuck suburbs. Fuck excluding people. I want housing density and actually walkable neighborhoods. YIMBY. Thanks.

        https://masslandlords.net/gentle-density-increases-nearby-property-values-evidence-shows-contrary-to-popular-belief/

        https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-02/does-affordable-housing-lower-property-values

        • hightrix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          2 years ago

          If you want to live in high density housing and extremely walkable areas, why not move to those areas rather than trying to force your desires on a neighborhood that entirely disagrees with your preferences?

          I live in the suburbs because I like low density housing. Why do you feel entitled to force your preference on me?

          • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 years ago

            The suburban model is not viable. This is a ponzi scheme where the county need to always build new houses that will generate new taxes to maintain the current infrastructure but won’t be enough to cover the new infrastructure when the time comes to service it.

            Mixed density buildings is the solution to this Ponzi scheme. Denser population will generate more tax on the same existing infrastructure and be sustainable.

            Your lifestyle is subsidized by urbanites.

          • Akisamb@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 years ago

            To avoid people being homeless ?

          • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I moved here because this is what exists lol. I didn’t design this place. It’s what’s here.

            I’m obviously not forcing my opinion on anyone because we live in a democracy. I’m allowed to have a different opinion from my neighbors. I hope you realize that. Maybe ask why you’re allowed to force your preferences on ME even though I have actual data and evidence that it’s nicer on my side of things and you’ll be happier here even though you’ve been taught to believe otherwise.

            Let me introduce you to some great resources on just how modern and terrible an anomaly American suburbs are. Really, they’re terrible. Terrible for your health, terrible for the environment, terrible for society and the economy. Ugly, soulless, fragile, useless Ponzi scheme that needs to end.

            https://youtu.be/Q1G_bda3o1o?si=Nt2WWZpqGfjSTZ3A

            https://youtu.be/QP5UCwMTjFk?si=GP092K-VW74fpVFp

            https://youtube.com/@strongtowns?si=vlCWBssaVY8BM1U2

            https://youtu.be/AOc8ASeHYNw?si=tyxnioOvfVsvhKXD

            https://youtu.be/oHlpmxLTxpw?si=AoSvXUh70FlKjgEU

          • ChewTiger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            deleted by creator

News@lemmy.world

news@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@lemmy.world

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.19K users / day
  • 5.98K users / week
  • 9.76K users / month
  • 19.8K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 36.3K subscribers
  • 33.6K Posts
  • 644K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • jeffw@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • rjc@lemmy.world
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org