• GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I highly doubt that poverty will ever be eradicated, unless we do something like shoot billionaires into the sun once they reach a billion.

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Poverty will never be eradicated, what kind of nonsense is that? The poverty is a feature of capitalism, not a bug.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    8 months ago

    Right, I’m sure there’s actually plans to eradicate poverty… more likely there’s plans to eradicate the impoverished.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    If a dollar was deposited into you account every SECOND, it would take approximately 32 years to get to just one billion dollars.

    Elon Musk has 180! And he’s the SECOND richest guy on Earth. The richest being Bernard Arnault at 211!!!

    It’s absolutely grotesque to be this filthy rich.

    Also, inb4 “It’S pApEr VaLuE, nOt ReAl MoNeY iN tHe BaNk”. Who cares? You could sell it all and become an international hero by ending all famine, bringing healthcare to everyone and giving shelter to everyone who needs it.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    It only makes sense that we collectively eat the first trillionaire.

    Tbh I’d guess that it’s unlikely that we’ll have a trillionaires at all. Hiding wealth will become easier and easier and I don’t think anyone wants that rep in “eat the billionaires” sort of public climate.

    • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I agree about hiding wealth and all that, but is the public climate actually “eat the billionaires?” Because I basically only see that in left-wing spaces. Normies still seem to be doing a ton of boot licking tbh. I do live in a pretty conservative area though so maybe that’s biased?

      • herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Speaking anecdotally, I’m pretty sure you’re right on that one. In my circle of (millenial / lefty) friends it’s basically seen as common sense. Among the average person I interact with, however, such as at work, it’s seen as a fringe idea. And I’m not even advocating for eating them in the revolutionary sense - just taxing the rich in a way that doesn’t allow any one person/family to horde egregious amounts of wealth to the point that they can unduly influence society with their power.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      We should have eaten the first billionaire. If we stay eating people we definitely didn’t stop as long as there are any billionaires.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Poverty will never be eradicated. At no point in human civilization have we managed to eliminate poverty, and as long as there are rich people needing to extract maximum profits from fellow humans there will always be poor people.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Poverty is needed for the rich to be rich. That’s the basic foundation of the system. That was really a dumb report. Except the trillionaire-thing. We will witness that

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    We have far greater productivity than at any other point in human history and we still have tons of poverty, even in places like the EU and US. I believe we have the capability but not the willingness. Who’s to say we’ll ever have the willingness.

  • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sweet, I could be a trillonaire by the time poverty will be eradicated. All I have to do is save $498,500 every single hour until then.

          • jballs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s ok. Just keep working hard at pulling yourself up by your bootstraps and I’m sure you’ll get there eventually. Since you’re so close, you should probably start voting against taxes on the rich now. That way you won’t have to worry about the damn greedy welfare queens taking your hard earned money once you’ve made it.

    • Powerpoint@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      As long as capitalism is the main system and governments fail to act on the abuse by the wealthy you are correct

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Even in other systems… poverty serves to keep the underclass in line. It’s hard to revolt when you don’t have enough to eat.

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That 229 figure is bullshit. Either all the impoverished will perish, be killed, or move underground into a less opulent/more satisfying culture where rat burgers reign supreme well before then or the real number is “fuck off you poor piece of trash.”