I recently saw ‘Don’t Look Now’ (1973). Good picture, a little slow perhaps by today’s standards but worthy of any movie enjoyer’s time! So this movie was shot in Venice. Venice itself being an already beautiful spot to film even today. The way we get to look in a time capsule of Venice in the 70s makes the movie that much better!

People in the 70s could not in fact appreciate it the same way we do now. Concurrently we also can’t do it for today’s movies. Some movies can only be truly appreciated over time is what I believe. This matter can be expressed in both the movie’s message or, as I did, its cinematography. Hence my question now to you.

  • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    The Matrix Still looks great and works as a trans allegory

    Gattaca Getting more prescient with each year

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Gattaca Getting more prescient with each year

      It’s kind of crazy how CRISPR turns the predictions on their head.

      • callouscomic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I personally feel Wall-E is unrealistic, because clearly at some point they decided to have robots do everything, and the people simply get to lounge around, get fat, and have all their worries cared for. This represents a society where technology made work unnecessary for humans, and generally most humans reap some benefits of it.

        This would never never happen. No. The robots will take the jobs, the rich will get richer. We will be left on earth to die horribly.

        • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ah yes this is not depicted but it happened in the past, the society you see on screen descends from the billionaires that survived

  • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Nearly everything Terry Gilliam made has aged very well for me. He creates strange and interesting visual worlds that never really seem dated because they all sort of exist in their own time-space.

    Also anything Jim Henson company touches seems to become immortal. Dark Crystal and Labyrinth are masterpieces.

    And to a lesser degree Don Coscarelli has made some pretty timeless films. Beastmaster is still very watchable.

    • Onions Sliced Thin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Gah! Now I need to go watch Dark Crystal again. That’s such a good movie, and I recently watched Labyrinth. I’ll cue it up, and then stick Brazil right behind.

        • Confused_Emus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Loved that series. The only downside is it’s kind of depressing because, given that it’s set before the movie, you know how it ultimately has to end for the gelflings.

        • Onions Sliced Thin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I hadn’t, but I was nervous given how many of the reboots and extension series attempts seemed to miss the mark. Maybe I should give it a try, anyway.

    • Cyclist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was going to mention Brazil because it’s one of the great distopian films. And I don’t know how to describe 12 Monkeys, it’s just really good.

  • BowserBasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Jurassic Park. Those dinos beat many of today’s CGI films. Mixed in with the animatronic ones they just blend in so well. The story is simple (to quote Dr Malcolm) God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs. There are so many quotable lines, as shown just now, and the music is pretty unforgettable too.

    • hactar42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      IMO, the early 90s was a golden age for movie effects. There was CGI but it was so primitive and expensive it was used sparingly. Like you mentioned that blend of practical and special effects was amazing.

      Another great example of this is Terminator 2. They obviously used CGI for the T-1000 but then they actually flew a helicopter under a highway overpass, drove a semi-truck off a bridge into the LA river, and blew up an office building.

    • forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I would say a lot of Spielberg’s work. It just doesn’t seem to age. I watched Munich a few weeks ago, and to me it could have come out yesterday. Same for Saving Private Ryan or Schindler’s List.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Although it was most likely for humor, if I had to guess how it would work in their world, it’s probably akin to silverware, where each shell is used for a different poop texture.

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Excuse me, could you pass a #2 seashell under the stall?

          (Nightmarish bowel sounds)

          Uhh, better make it a #3.

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      That movie pissed my ex off. 23 minutes before there was any dialogue. Should have known then and there the relationship was doomed.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        That sounds pretty similar to our experience. I’ve always heard great things, but never saw it.

        20 minutes in I apologized for suggesting it and we watched some paint dry instead.

        • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Same. Any time I’ve discussed this movie, I always critique it that chapter 1 should have been shorter, 2 and 3 should have been longer and 4 should have been skipped entirely.

          That said, the soundtrack and visuals are amazing. Watching it as a music video, like Interstella 5555, would be decent.

    • demesisx@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Little known fact: the visual effects look so good because they shot the mattes and all elements ON THE SAME PIECE OF FILM. They’d shoot the matte, put the film in storage, build the set, then shoot the scene on top of that.

  • ace_garp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The original Blade Runner(1982)

    That sparse and bleak mood will never age. Poses excellent dilemas and moral questions about cyborgs too.

    Also Citizen Kane. I watched it a couple of years ago because of it’s position in film history. Yes, it is that good of a masterpiece.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I feel like Citizen Kane is only good with a little bit of prep. Most people are watching movies for an entertaining story, and it doesn’t have that by today’s standards.

      I took a film history class in college and we spent a week learning about the framing, lighting and symbolism used throughout the movie BEFORE we watched it, and I had never appreciated the movie until then.

      • Discoslugs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Dang. I had to watch this scene again. Definitely not consentual. Shes like running out the door before he steps in front of her.

  • scoobford@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    My vote goes to trading places, because it had both aged incredibly well (a tale of class solidarity against evil eugenics-peddling billionaires), and incredibly poorly (a story about nondiscrimination with that damn train scene right in the middle).

    I’d also like yo mention RoboCop and American Psycho because their satirization of American hyper capitalism has only gotten more accurate. It really is depressing that we have the exact same social issues that we did in the 80s.

    • The_Tired_Horizon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m trying to get the young lads at work (early 20s) to watch movies like Trading Places. All they want to watch is Fast n Furious.

      • scoobford@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Careful my guy. If you haven’t seen it in a while, Dan Akroyd does blackface. I think overall the movie has a positive message that fits in well today, but how they delivered that message only really hits if you’re a white guy from a couple decades back.

        • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Was his blackface appropriate? It’s been so long since I saw that movie. There are certain circumstances where it is appropriate to wear blackface.

          • scoobford@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’d say no. It is a bit gag, and Dan Akroyd is pretending to be a Jamaican stoner. Nothing stuck out to me as being intentionally hateful or shitty, just…really unfortunate taste.

            Given the context of the rest of the film, I think it mainly comes from ignorance. I suspect that a writer’s room in 80s Hollywood wasn’t super diverse.

    • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      I Showed the Goonies to a couple of young teens in my fam and they thought it was boring and weird… :( . Sucks to be them, missing out on this gem of a movie!

        • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Excellent point! A new fam batch is brewing ages 2-4 right now, i’ll try again in a year or 6 😊

  • somnuz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Bunny Lake Is Missing (1965) — hard to say anything without spoiling the plot

    Blair Witch Project (1999) — I just admire how great idea / concept extended beyond the movie itself. No-one can ever watch it again for a first time during ‘99 but it is iconic and great as a case study of having almost no budget and making something really impactful / special

    Her (2013) — this one is my answer for the same question but asked in 2061…

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Appreciate the love for BWP. I really enjoyed it when it came out. My friends/family all made fun of me, parroting the usual criticisms.

      • somnuz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh! I didn’t see it when it came out. I saw it around 2002 — and let’s just underline one thing here, some people in my family can really pull proper pranks. With this movie (all this is not happening in the US) my cousin made the whole introduction for me and others “this movie is not actually a movie, it was not played in many cinemas, it was banned almost instantly, you can not buy it or rent it, I ordered this tape via a magazine about unresolved police investigations from around the world and this is just a montage of what was found there… I saw it only once, it is pretty disturbing, weird. I don’t believe in anything supernatural but fuck, this movie makes me question some things now…” — like… come on! I heard and read so many different versions of this story from others and their experiences almost always boiled down to the same conclusion for me, the movie was just a possibility to make everything around the movie so much more impactful than the movie in itself, urban legend for creating more urban legends. Next level sneaky move. On the other hand, “Yeah I saw it, it’s all fake and made up, someone explained to me how it’s all a hoax, really nothing special, stupid, boring and not scary at all” — how circumstances can change everything.

        The other, similar one was during “The Ring” where my uncle was calling from his cellphone on their home landline every time the phone rang in the movie. They were so boggled about it to the point where they were rewinding the movie to test it… They didn’t finish it. One of family legends was born on that night…

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I saw Her and thought it was an instant classic but was floored people I recommended it to thought it was dark or unrealistic or other things. It was almost contemporary when it came out!