• Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    It should be noted that this is just a method to determine the amount of infected cows. The milk itself isn’t a threat to anyone. Virus fragments in themselves can’t do anything, they’re just a sign of the original cow problem.

    Call out anyone that tries to fearmonger about the milk being dangerous.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      The bigger concern, that not many people are taking about, is wildlife. This bird flu is spreading out in the wild and has been taking out all sorts of endangered birds and mammals in mass quantities.

      And if something jumps into humans, it’s more likely to happen from the massive spread happening in local wildlife.

    • WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah gotta nip that in the bud. Although people stepping away from buying dairy milk wouldn’t be so bad I guess.

        • Nine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          There’s still people using livestock dewormer as a cure all when they can’t get their doc to write a script… so not drinking raw milk is just a libtard “suggestion” to them or the person saying it is just “in the pocket of big dairy” …

          weee!!! oh what a fun & exciting dystopia we’re in!! /s

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            You talking about Ivermectin? Do you know that’s been prescribed hundreds of millions of times as human medicine before the pandemic?

            That’s like calling popcorn “livestock feed”.

            edit: It’s a serious question. Did you know that or not? If it’s true and you didn’t know it, what does that imply about your information sources?

            • Nine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah it’s widely considered the most important medicine in human history. It’s amazing for what it does when used for what it should be!!

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      From what I’ve read it doesn’t seem to be a particularly severe disease for cows anyway. The hubbub is mostly about the potential for farm and dairy workers to catch it directly from a cow, which still seems like an incredibly rare occurrence

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    5 months ago

    Health officials maintain — and experts agree — that pasteurized milk is safe to drink. The FDA detected small pieces of the virus in milk, not live, infectious virus.

    “Right now, all indication is that pasteurization is effective,” said Dr. Andrew Bowman, a veterinary epidemiologist at Ohio State University.

    Pasteurization doing its job.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Comcast is too busy overcharging for mediocre broadband to care about their tv channels stock art. (They own NBC. Which makes total sense, right?)

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    Concerning infrastructure investment, we should really put a lot into waste measurement everywhere for issues that affect health. It’s the best alarm for growing problems at a large scale sampling that can’t be fudged or missed. Many areas have all but stopped constant monitoring because of budget.