• SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sometimes, the AI gets the little details wrong.

    In school we always get an assignment to compare the same story in different newspapers. It was amazing to see them all have different details. And that was before the internet existed. So AI here isn’t better, just cheaper.

    Other times, the AI wholly fabricates events.

    We call that Boris Johnson.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I mean, the AI is worse. It’s literally impossible to not be worse, it would need a 100% accuracy to the sample data while also never hallucinating, that’s pretty much completely impossible.

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is a bit of cliche, but still relevant to our current times:

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters.

    Antonio Gramsci (Italian Marxist philospher from the turn of the century)

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I think there are times when it is more relevant, e.g. initial change from a feudal/agrarian model to industrialization. By all accounts this was perhaps the biggest, most impactful change in human history.

        One could argue that we are now witnessing a similar transition with respect to the information age.

        At any rate, this was a somewhat glib statement on my part. :)

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    Speaking of details wrong:

    most downloaded local news app

    • 50,000,000+ downloads

    Meanwhile Google News (which does local):

    • 1,000,000,000+ downloads
  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s almost like they are trying to shoehorn AI into anything and everything regardless of whether it is a good fit, and regardless of whether the technology is ready, and regardless of the outcome. Like blockchain. And IoT. And Angry Birds. (j/k on that last one. Kinda.)

    But that’s none of my business, I’m just a puppet frog drinking tea.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh wow, I did not read the source Reuters article and yeah it’s a Chinese project.

        This is the kind of stuff that should make Americans evaluate whether their orthodox and somewhat parochial approach to “free speech” (the polemical definition as opposed to the broad concept) needs updating to reflect modern realities.

        Even before AI and digitization, there were many examples of how an American interpretation of free speech was clearly lacking, but this AI spam and strategic methods used by russia/China are going to make these deficiencies a much more pressing matter.

    • d00phy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Like cloud, too. Behind the Bastards did an episode on these trends. He had an interesting take. I guess “AI” and/or the tech bros who pump and dump these tech trends one after the other were the bastards.

  • ObamaBinLaden@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I usually respect ars technical for writing great stories. This time, however, they could’ve included the name of the app so it wasn’t clickbaity. It’s newsbreak for those wondering.

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Uh… The very first sentence mmmmm

      After the most downloaded local news app in the US, NewsBreak, shared an AI-generated story about a fake New Jersey shooting last Christmas Eve, New Jersey police had to post a statement online to reassure troubled citizens that the story was “entirely false,” Reuters reported.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Right, but the headline doesn’t include that to bait you into clicking the article to get that information. Just like every other click bait article about android app issues.

        • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          5 months ago

          I usually respect ars technical for writing great stories. This time, however, they could’ve included the name of the app so it wasn’t clickbaity

          so now youre changing your requirements after your first statement is shown to be flawed? The headline rarely conveys what you are suggesting.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            so now youre changing your requirements after your first statement is shown to be flawed?

            L. O. L.

            First of all, my story can’t change, since that’s my first comment in this thread. Second, reading comprehension is your friend in situations like this. From what you quoted:

            I usually respect ars technical for writing great stories.

            This time, however, they could’ve included the name of the app so it wasn’t clickbaity

            Those are two independent clauses, referring to content and headline separately. That would be clear if you consider the definition of click bait:

            Clickbait typically refers to the practice of writing sensationalized or misleading headlines in order to attract clicks on a piece of content. It often relies on exaggerating claims or leaving out key information in order to encourage traffic.

            Their wording a bit confusing if you’re not reading closely, but their original point still stands. The content is generally good, but the headline is clickbaity.

            The headline rarely conveys what you are suggesting.

            Just because click bait is common doesn’t mean it isn’t click bait.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                5 months ago

                Lol, ok kid. I’m not going to argue with you all day because you misinterpreted someone else’s confusingly worded statement.

                I don’t have time to deal with that kind of fragile ego.

              • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                They aren’t the original poster. you’re just yelling at some passerby who was simply trying to tell you that you misinterpreted the original comment…

  • xenoclast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is it a “top” news service if I’ve never heard of it?

    I’ve seen false AI gen stories reported by Reuters itself for pity sake.