• m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Would be nice if there were some actual alternatives about the same price range and not using proprietary softwares…

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Unfortunately anything open will cost extra, just because of the nature of it. Not to mention the colossal scale of how much product DJI ship, to cut costs somewhere

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        The reduction of monitoring is worth it. DJI calls home with your location and even provides tools for police to view the location of drones and drone operators in real time.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh no, not the location data that has to be shared publicly for safety reasons anyways! God forbid!

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I am confused then what is Congress’ problem here?

          Aint this where they are taking us anyway? Or they are worried commie police also getting the same info?

    • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Literally all of the alternatives are open and much more capable for it. You can go buy a pixhawk and basically any frame and have something much more powerful for much less money, you just have to be willing to bolt two or three parts together.