Louisiana has become the first state to require that the Ten Commandments be displayed in every public school classroom under a bill signed into law by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry on Wednesday.

The GOP-drafted legislation mandates that a poster-sized display of the Ten Commandments in “large, easily readable font” be required in all public classrooms, from kindergarten to state-funded universities. Although the bill did not receive final approval from Landry, the time for gubernatorial action — to sign or veto the bill — has lapsed.

Opponents question the law’s constitutionality, warning that lawsuits are likely to follow. Proponents say the purpose of the measure is not solely religious, but that it has historical significance. In the law’s language, the Ten Commandments are described as “foundational documents of our state and national government.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    224
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Can’t wait to see the eight seven tenets of the Satanic Temple right up there next to them

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    the Ten Commandments are described as “foundational documents of our state and national government.

    Jefferson must be rolling in his grave so fast that he could power the whole east coast. Bunch of uneducated goons.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d love for them to point to where it suggests that in either the federal or state constitutions.

    • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Bunch of uneducated goons.

      Oh, they know they’re lying, they just want to lie so much they bury the truth re-write the past (which is kinda ironic if you think about it, given that whole eight commandment). It’s kinda the same way the “Lost Cause of the Confederacy” is embedded into American mythology despite being a after-the-fact whitewashing of history.

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        No one challenged the law makers to prove that they were right. They are lying because they can get away with it - no one in any position of power asked or was asked which foundational document was forged by forefathers from Christian (or any religion) doctrine.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      6 and 8 are the only ones that are laws, and those are just common sense shit, don’t murder or steal. The first 4 are telling you what god to worship and how, which are explicitly the opposite of what a government is built on.

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    5 months ago

    Display them in Arabic.

    This would never have survived scotus 5 years ago. Today I would not bet against them finding it constitutional

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m so sick and tired Of these Christophascist Trying to force their pedophile religion on me and my kids.

  • mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    They’ll probably publish the abridged version, sadly. The full version reads, as we well know:

    Thou shall not commit adultery but, if thou doest, thou shalt pay off the other woman so that it harmeth not thy chances in the presidential election. Nor shall it turn thy supporters against thee when they heareth of it.

    • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      It should be in proper English: not these new interpretations—as if they could re-write the Bible—blasphemy! I say.

      ws:Bible (Tyndale)/Exodus#Chapter 20

      https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Bible_(Tyndale)/Exodus#Chapter_20

      1 And God spake all these wordes ad saide:

      2 I am the Lorde thy God, which haue brought the out of the londe of Egipte ad out of the house of bondage.

      3 Thou shalt haue none other goddes in my syght.

      4 Thou shalt make the no grauen ymage, nether any symilitude that is in heauen aboue, ether in the erth beneth, or in the water that ys beneth the erth.

      5 Se that thou nether bowe thy sylf vnto them nether serue them: for I the Lorde thy God, am a gelouse God, and viset the synne of the fathers vppon the childern vnto the third and fourth generacion of the that hate me:

      6 and yet shewe mercie vnto thousandes amonge them that loue me and kepe my commaundmentes.

      7 Thou shalt not take the name of the Lorde thy God in vayne, for the Lord wil not holde him giltlesse that taketh his name in vayne.

      8 Remebre the Sabbath daye that thou sanctifie it.

      9 Sixe dayes mayst thou laboure ad do al that thou hast to doo:

      10 but the seuenth daye is the Sabbath of the Lorde thy God, in it thou shalt do no maner worke: nether thou nor thy sonne, nor thy doughter, nether thy manservaunte nor thy maydeservaunte, nether thy catell nether yet the straunger that is within thi gates

      11 For in sixe dayes the Lorde made both heauen and erth and the see and all that in them is and rested the seuenth daye: wherfore the Lorde blessed the Sabbath daye and halowed it.

      12 Honoure thy father ad thy mother, that thy dayes may be loge in the lode which the Lorde thy God geueth the.

      13 Thou shalt not kyll.

      14 Thou shalt not breake wedlocke.

      15 Thou shalt not steale.

      16 Thou shalt bere no false witnesse agest thy neghboure

      17 Thou shalt not couet thy neghbours housse: nether shalt couet thy neghbours wife, his maservaunte, his mayde, his oxe, his asse or oughte that is his.

      18 And all the people sawe the thunder ad the lyghteninge and the noyse of the horne, ad howe the mountayne smoked. And whe the people sawe it, they remoued ad stode a ferre of

        • threeganzi@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          The Bible was actually written in three different ancient languages: Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. While a modern version of each of these languages is spoken today, most modern readers of those languages would have some difficulty with the ancient versions used in the biblical texts.

          Source

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    5 months ago

    Cool, cool, cool … They going to ban pork products and all shellfish too? Or are we cherry picking here… Seems like it be right blasphemous to be cherry picking…

    Honestly I can make a whole list.

  • UnPassive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    5 months ago

    Only thing historically significant about the 10 commandments is that the founding fathers didn’t want them in classrooms

  • GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    How is this not a first amendment constitutional violation? It very clearly establishes a state religion by enforcing Christian doctrine into state law. Fuck every religion, but in particular, fuck abrahamic religion and all of its followers.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If they actually believe in that whole originalism thing they claim (basically that the text of the constitution means what it would have meant at the time it was written, and shifts in the definition of words don’t change that meaning) they still can’t allow it. There’s basically no way to interpret the Constitution that would result in mandating a specific religious affirmation be in public facilities isn’t “promoting an establishment of religion”.

        The best they could hope for without just ignoring the Constitution entirely and making something up (which all their conservatism.aside they generally haven’t done yet) would be arguing that this requires opening the door to any similar list of religious tenets by literally every faith on the planet.

    • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      As a Canadian, I have the same question. Is this just the old "slam through an obviously unconstitutional law because it will take years and hundreds of thousands of dollars to get it undone and until then maybe we can keep pushing our clearly anti-American agenda? (note I’m using American to mean what they claim it to mean, like in the movies, not what it actually is, which is kinda… this.)

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    5 months ago

    There should be penalties for anyone who passes an obviously unconstitutional law.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean personal penalties. There are individual people responsible for this. Punish them, not the state.

        • scaredoftrumpwinning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          There are elections but most of their constitutes don’t care about the constitution so that doesn’t matter. I believe most of these guys have lawyers advising them or are lawyers themselves so the bar might be able to do something.

          If the bar stepped in and said advisors and others with law degree could loose them trying to pass laws that were struck down before that might work.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’d just hang my classroom full of different religious and non-religious commandments.

    The christian one will be there … somewhere.

    Probably covered by the 10 commandments of Tacos:

    spoiler
    • Thou shall stuff to capacity, and then a little more
    • Thou shall honor thy taco father and taco mother
    • Thou shalt not skimp on the cheese, and lest it be fresco, thou shall let it melt
    • Thou shalt not charge $6 for a taco
    • Thou shalt not use crappy tortillas
    • Thou shall be consistent with size
    • Thou shalt not overcharge for avocado
    • Thou shall stop referring to fusion tortilla wraps as tacos
    • Thou shalt not overlook breakfast ingredients
    • Thou shall have pride in your tacos, or not have tacos at all
  • MisplacedAstronaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    We need to enact a law that requires states to either adhere to the Seperation of Church and State or have every single church in their state have their religious tax exemption status revoked. Churches that get it revoked is mandatorily required a tax payback to the IRS of up to 5 years or more. If a church is unable to payback owed taxes once revoked will have their churches taken and land converted to into free public usage.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 months ago

      Did you know if every church in America took in two homeless people, there wouldn’t be any homeless people left in America?

      • WildPalmTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Me: Please let me know how many homeless people each church would need to host to help all the homeless people

        ChatGPT: Each church in the United States would need to host approximately 1.87 homeless people to accommodate all the homeless individuals in the country.

        That is truly absurd!

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          It really is absurd. I want someone to create a trend of how many homeless does your church house? Kind of like a competition… in reality some large churches could support 100 and other very small rural ones might struggle to support one.

    • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      19 “The first offspring of every womb belongs to me, including all the firstborn males of your livestock, whether from herd or flock. 20 Redeem the firstborn donkey with a lamb, but if you do not redeem it, break its neck. Redeem all your firstborn sons.

      Wow. What does that even mean?

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        What it says, the firstborn of every womb belongs to God and should be sacrificed to him, but you can trade a lamb if you want to keep the firstborn, like a coupon.

        So hypothetically, you either sacrifice a lamb to God or kill your first born child - this mirrors nicely with Passover.

        • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I dunno but we have this dish in Sweden called blodpalt. Bread with blood. I guess you can’t sacrifice those.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I don’t know that the authors of the book of Exodus were considering Swedish food when they wrote it. But I guess no putting cow blood on your matzoh before burning it at the altar?