The father of the Apalachee High School shooting suspect has been arrested in connection with the shooting that left four people dead, according to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    3 months ago

    Reading about the family Holy shit what a bunch of fuckups.

    Mom was crazy as fuck and dad was just as fucked up. This kid never had a chance. Hopefully, the sibling is removed from them because Gawd damn those some fucked up people.

  • randompasta@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Does that mean we’re out of the thoughtx and prayerx phase and we can talk about sensible gun control?

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      In this case, the sensible gun control would be “Your minor son got investigated by the FBI for wanting to shoot up a school, no you can’t buy a gun.”

      But nobody got convicted so the investigation doesn’t count!

      • FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        But nobody got convicted so the investigation doesn’t count!

        The Due Process Clause will do that.

      • Nate Cox@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        I appreciate your intent with this, but one of our fundamental rights is due process. Penalizing an individual for simply being investigated would violate that right.

        I’m not sure I’m willing to participate in experimenting with a US government where due process is wishy washy. I remember how horny we got for suspending habeas corpus via the patriot act.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s going to be easier to make a legislative change like that than it is to make a constitutional change on guns.

          But as it is, we already suspend gun rights without a conviction, maybe you haven’t seen the current ATF form 4473:

          “21© Are you under indictment or information in any court for a felony, or any other crime for which the judge could imprison you for more than one year, or are you a current member of the military who has been charged with violation(s) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and whose charge(s) have been referred to a general court-martial?”

          Change that to something like “Have you been investigated in the past 12 to 24 months…”

          But I’d argue, if we want to get REALLY serious about shootings, each line on this form should read:

          “Are you or anyone in your household…”

          • Nate Cox@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            Being actively under indictment is a lot different than just being investigated. Indictment requires that sufficient evidence has been gathered, reviewed, and (for a federal case) at least 12 of 23 jurors in a grand jury believe there is at least a 50% chance that you have actually committed a crime (12/16 jurors at the state level).

            By the time you have been indicted you have received a lot of due process resulting in a concrete belief that if you go to court you will be convicted of having committed a crime.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m not sure I’m willing to participate in experimenting with a US government where due process is wishy washy.

          Lol welcome to the laboratory.

    • boydster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Mmm that’s a real neat idea but you see if we could somehow get more guns into society, we might finally hit the critical mass where the t’s and p’s become irrelevant because of all the freedom, you see

    • Fester@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      We haven’t passed the number of deaths that make Americans start to feel like the deaths aren’t acceptable and that we should make any minor sacrifice to prevent them. I don’t know what the number is, but it’s at least higher than 1 million over 2 years.

      • evidences@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        If one gunman killed around 3k people we’d be in the range of invade 2 countries territory but I doubt it bring of calls for domestic gun control.

        • Fester@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well that’s just war. That’s like, a Tuesday. It’s already policy to wage war whenever there’s an excuse. Not going to war — now that would be tough. Lowering avoidable deaths is the thing we have a problem with.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    CNN publicizing the shooters name. Gotta make sure the shooters know they can be famous!

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is silly. Do you really think censoring shooter’s names is going to do jack shit? Name the parkland shooter, or the Walmart shooter in Texas. I bet you can’t. I know the average American can’t.

      This is an attractive idea because it gives us agency to punish these people somehow. We see them get wall-to-wall media coverage and incorrectly assume that’s the motivation because it’s hard to imagine shooting kids for any reason and the media coverage is the most available effect to us.

      If that’s not convincing, then just know that Tucker Carlson agrees with you.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Name the parkland shooter, or the Walmart shooter in Texas. I bet you can’t. I know the average American can’t.

        The reason we can’t name them is that THERE’S TOO FUCKING MANY OF THEM TO REMEMBER. I can’t even remember the incidents you’re talking about, let alone who did them.

      • Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mate, same reason they demolished Hitler’s house and dumped Bin Laden’s body. The freaks will always worship the remnants.

        Wiping these fuckwits off the face of the planet is the best thing you can do. They certainly enjoy being infamous and others admire them.

        • orbitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          With the amount of them these days does it make a difference? I get the idea for sure, and when there were less of them it was easier and made some sense, but these days you may as well be plugging the hoover dam with bubble gum. Even if all the mainstream outlets didn’t say the name, someone will.

          I do hope for better, but I don’t think not printing a name is going to help.

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I couldn’t tell you the Trump shooters name without googling and that was only a few months ago. But I could Google it. These people are famous yes but I don’t think that’s the motivation. Why the fuck would I care if I’m famous, I’m still dead.

        The only solution is make it harder to get the guns in the first place and easier and less stigmatized to get the mental health care they need.

        • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          They aren’t thinking about being famous. If you’ve ever had suicidal thoughts like I have (long time ago, I’m fine) then you’ll know that you just want to impact the people that you feel did this to you. It’s a twisted way of thinking but that’s how it works.

          So they aren’t concerned with being famous, they’re concerned about having a large impact and making people feel the suffering they feel. It’s not a coincidence that it’s young men that do this. It’s not a stretch going from “You failed as a parent, blame yourself for my death” to “You failed as a parent and caused me so much pain that other people will feel it and you should blame yourselves”.

          But most people aren’t like that. They just want the pain to end and for the world to be sorry that they’re gone. They don’t care if they’ll be dead.

          If either of those are familiar to you currently, please look at therapy or call a local hotline.