The number of people sleeping outdoors in San Francisco dropped to under 3,000 in January, the lowest the city has recorded in a decade, according to a federal count.

The number of people sleeping outdoors dropped to under 3,000 in January, the lowest the city has recorded in a decade, according to a federal count.

And that figure has likely dropped even lower since Mayor London Breed — a Democrat in a difficult reelection fight this November — started ramping up enforcement of anti-camping laws in August following a U.S. Supreme Court decision.

Homelessness in no way has gone away, and in fact grew 7%, to 8,300 in January, according to the same federal count.

But the problem is now notably out of the public eye, raising the question of where people have gone and whether the change marks a turning point in a crisis long associated with San Francisco.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1053·
    2 months ago

    Homelessness in no way has gone away, and in fact grew 7%, to 8,300 in January, according to the same federal count.

    Oh, good, who needs to address a problem when you can ignore it?

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        417·
        2 months ago

        This isn’t a partizan issue, just like immigration, Democrats are fucking horrible on homelessness too.

        • GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
          51·
          2 months ago

          Aside from lots of blue state tax dollars that feasibility could be spend on homelessness and other infrastructure projects subsidize red states.

          And any truly effective solutions can’t be at the city or state level, else homeless folks will migrate there for a better life, thus overwhelming the local system. It has to be federal. That means republicans get to shoot it down yet again, with how tight congress is.

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          41·
          2 months ago

          Republicans simply want to push the problem into other communities. Half of the Democrats want to do the same. There are a good chunk of faux progressive politicians that recognize a grift opportunity and then get money funneled to NGOs that have no oversight. But there is at least a small percentage of Democratic politicians wanting to actually solve the problem. In my county, the county bought up several hotels/motels and are housing a couple thousand homeless. In LA, they did something similar except they gave the money to an NGO that was supposed to buy up hotels and make them usable by the homeless. Instead, the NGO decided it would be a good idea to also borrow a bunch of money also to purchase the properties, couldn’t repay the loan and then the properties were repossessed and house zero homeless.

        • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
          518·
          2 months ago

          So why is the number at a decade low under a democratic mayor???

          How are you in the comment thread of an article that says homeless camping is at decade low, with a Democrat in charge, and saying the Democrats don’t care?

          I guess you’re just that dense.

          • snooggums@lemmy.worldEnglish
            233·
            2 months ago

            And that figure has likely dropped even lower since Mayor London Breed — a Democrat in a difficult reelection fight this November — started ramping up enforcement of anti-camping laws in August following a U.S. Supreme Court decision.

            The mayor isn’t helping the homeless. She is driving them away so they can be someone else’s problem.

            • kescusay@lemmy.world
              71·
              2 months ago

              She. And part of her platform as mayor is a massive increase in homeless shelter beds, specifically to get homeless people off the streets and into safer environments.

              So… She’s actively not “driving them away,” near as I can tell.

            • Blackout@fedia.io
              5·
              2 months ago

              Many were driven there in the first place from cities like Las Vegas. The truth is California has been investing in temporary shelters and tiny home communities. It’s more than I’ve seen in other states

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      74·
      2 months ago

      San Francisco has increased the number of shelter beds and permanent supportive housing units by more than 50% over the past six years.

      Read the article before commenting next time.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        143·
        2 months ago

        Shelters are not permanent living accommodations. They don’t let you stay in them long-term. On top of that, everything from just basic theft to sexual assault happens in shelters.

        Also, if you have a dog, you can’t bring the dog with you. If you’re a woman alone on the streets, having a dog around to protect you is a pretty good idea.

        So increasing the number of shelter beds doesn’t do shit. Permanent housing units, fine. But touting shelters is just bullshit.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        51·
        2 months ago

        You skipped the “and permanent housing units” part of my comment. Shelters are a step to getting off the street. They give homeless access to information and resources to improve their position. It is in no way “ignoring the problem” like you claim. Short of singlehandedly solving poverty, what do you expect a mayor to do?

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      1217·
      2 months ago

      I mean,

      How do you read the article, see that the number of people sleeping outside is as low as it’s been in a decade, dropped from a number that was increasing, and then say nothing is being done about it?

      Your gymnastics are of the type brought to the Olympics by the Russian team.

      • puppy@lemmy.world
        164·
        2 months ago

        Homelessness in no way has gone away, and in fact grew 7%, to 8,300 in January, according to the same federal count.

        Then YOUR gymnastics are at the Russian elite spy level in a Bond movie.