The number of people sleeping outdoors dropped to under 3,000 in January, the lowest the city has recorded in a decade, according to a federal count.

And that figure has likely dropped even lower since Mayor London Breed — a Democrat in a difficult reelection fight this November — started ramping up enforcement of anti-camping laws in August following a U.S. Supreme Court decision.

Homelessness in no way has gone away, and in fact grew 7%, to 8,300 in January, according to the same federal count.

But the problem is now notably out of the public eye, raising the question of where people have gone and whether the change marks a turning point in a crisis long associated with San Francisco.

  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    62
    ·
    6 days ago

    Eh. Using public well used spaces as your own personal living space is selfish and disrespectful of everyone else. You got a tent, go out and live in the woods.

    There is no reason to be in the city if you’re homeless other than access to drugs.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Or doctors. Or jobs. Or grocery stores.

      You’d be surprised how many homeless or car bound are employed.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Using public well used spaces as your own personal living space is selfish and disrespectful of everyone else.

      Tell that to every person parking their car in public. It’s an insane waste of space and massive subsidy to the already privileged. We give free/cheap rent to cars EVERYWHERE but far far less for actual humans.

      If we ban cars, we would probably double the amount of land available housing. Not to mention the benefits in terms of imperialism, pollution, violence, equity, wastefulness, etc.

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Imperialism? Are you just throwing words you once heard around or do you have a genuinely unhinged understanding of the world?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      There is no reason to be in the city if you’re homeless other than access to drugs.

      Unless you are homeless and unemployed. Which is a thing. Especially in cities with ridiculously high rent like SF.

      You can’t really think that all the homeless people in cities are drug addicts.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      I hope you never become homeless.

      Or maybe I hope you do, just enough so that you can understand what those people are going through.

    • norimee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Aren’t you a peach. I hope your username stands for Dick-karma and I hope that karma of being a dick comes back to you tenfold.

    • puppy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Eh. Using public well used spaces as your own personal living space is selfish and disrespectful of everyone else.

      Hopefully you support a ban on private vehicles then? Special big trucks and SUVs.