• perestroika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago
    • Because propaganda works. If propaganda didn’t work, companies would not advertise products and politicians wouldn’t run campaigns. Rich sponsors fund politicians who promise to look after their interests. Well-funded politicians run better campaigns and win.

    • Because politicians are, nearly without exception, above middle class, if not outright rich. They won’t act too radically against their own class interests.

    The only solution I know comes from ancient Athens. Sortition -> you hold a lottery to draw representatives. A few extremely stupid people will be drawn into parliament, but idiots are far better than sociopaths, and the current system gives undue representation to sociopaths (willing to climb over bodies if that gets them to power). If one then dislikes the idea of a considerable percentage of bumbling fools (as opposed to cunning predators) in parliament, one must feed everyone well, treat all childhood diseases and educate everyone as well as possible. As if their rational decisions were needed tomorrow.

      • perestroika@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        True.

        Hunger for power would exist, but a critical feature that currently exists - the means of returning to power - would be absent.

        Bribes would be a concern, so good pay and anti-corruption mechanicms would still be required.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          the means of returning to power - would be absent.

          Unless the randomized reps decide they like their newfound power, and change the rules to allow them to maintain/extend/return to power.

          Bribes would be a concern, so good pay and anti-corruption mechanicms would still be required.

          Direct bribes are only part of the problem. Corporations would still do the things they’re doing now, where they bribe politicians with cushy jobs once they leave their government positions. Good pay on the job while at the government doesn’t stop that.

  • ZMoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    A lot of people have aspirations of themselves being rich and if they can vote like rich people they participate in the rich aesthetic.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The sooner you realize the vast majority of humans are simply not very intelligent, the more everything starts making sense. And the more depressed you will be.

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I have no science behind this (and am therefore a hypocrite) but I’m giving up on the assumption that people think. I suspect that most people feel and make decisions on those feelings.
      Thinking happens later, if at all.

      • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Humans are animals that navigate life through the lens of emotions with logic being something that we have to work towards - so you may be closer to the truth than you think.

      • Eunie@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Replace ‘average’ by ‘median’ to be correct. The average can be distorted by especially dumb people.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Keep in mind that if you are in a public space, about half the people around you have an IQ below 100.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If I’m struggling this much now then imagine how much harder it will be when I have to pay higher taxes

  • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Because they’ve successfully been conned into thinking that what’s in the best interests of the rich is in their own best interests too.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Because the rich pretend like it’s in peoples interest, people believe them because oh they are rich they must know what they are talking about, and because people are stupid.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The majority of people vote with their gut and won’t look deep into what politician A is promising, so long as one of the promises is exactly the thing the person wants. For a considerable number of gamers, it’s dealing with woke culture. Trump is a fervent enemy of “the woke”, but he also promised hefty import tariffs on everything, so consoles can get really damn expensive. But hey, the woke sjw’s are getting owned!!

    This piece on Aftermath touches an important point as well, that left leaning content often takes care to not spout random bullshit, while right leaning will just say whatever because haha engagement goes brrrrrrr.

    Going off a tangent, the Brazilian right complains that “the poor vote with their bellies”, implying they’ll vote for whoever promises “free money” or “free meals”, usually in the form of govt programs. During election years, the right will try to claim they were the masterminds behind every sort of program meant to help poor people, such as Bolsa Familia, while loudly and constantly complaining about their existence and doing everything in their power to block money outside election years. It’s common to find people who depend(ed) on Bolsa Familia to survive that complain about “freeloaders” that “want to be fed by the government”. A good portion of right-wingers also believe that the govt pays a whole minimum wage to every person in jail, despite this bullshit being debunked several times already.

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Ignorance and gullibility. I fall for misinformation all the time, especially when it confirms my own biases and it takes real effort to maintain a mindset of “yes this sounds true, but is it actually?” It is also terribly inefficient. If someone tells me, when I was a kid, that daddylonglegs spiders are the most poisonous, I am likely going to just go “neat” and now I think that and say it. If you stop and verify EVERYTHING EVER you have no time to do anything in life. This makes the filter of critical thinking…critical.

    Also, it isn’t about being stupid (though that helps). Some of the smartest people I know are conspiracy theory nutjobs. They can easily draw parallels between disparate facts, but can’t filter their findings or understand correlation doesn’t equal causation.

    • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yep. Lost a good and very smart friend to the anti vax conspiracies and maybe others by now.

      I’ve also had to really pay attention and tell myself that I live in a liberal bubble and need to balance that bias against what is truth.

  • Apathy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Most are wanting an end to this current system so they’ll ‘play’ it out knowing albeit the struggle, Democracy has left the building and late stage capitalism is showing the disparity of the predators and preys of society

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    In the US, is this actually the moment past the point of no return? Would you ever allow yourself to accept that truth if so, or will you need to see actually bodies in the streets before you believe it’s over?

  • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Who is there to vote for otherwise? Two sides of the same coin. The rich try to keep politics about anything except wealth inequality. The rich keep the good candidates off your ballot long before it’s time to choose between tweedle Dee and tweedle dum.