• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I am honestly surprised people fucked over by health insurance haven’t tried to take things into their own hands before, if that’s what this is. And if that’s not what this is, it surprises me that it hasn’t happened yet.

    Plenty of people (me included) have been severely fucked over by insurance companies. I’m not willing to kill anyone, but there are a lot of people out there who are. Especially if they know they’re dying and have nothing to lose.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      89
      ·
      8 days ago

      The CEO is an employee, a manager. You know how shops have managers hired by the owners to run the place? If that were the motive, wouldn’t owners be the preferred target?

      • noscere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        A CEO is a CEO. Just because they are accountable to the shareholders does not make them working class. The CEO is the closest thing a corporation has to a singular owner. Their compensation package includes shares (ownership) of the company and they are the ones who make the decisions.

        Literally their “job” is to be responsible for the actions of a corporation.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          8 days ago

          Sure, they do make a lot of decisions, no question. However, those decisions are at the direction of a Board of Directors.

          In the same way a manager would be fired if they went against their owners wishes, a CEO is similarly subject to their superiors.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            8 days ago

            If a CEO has very little authority as you claim then what the fuck are they getting paid all that money for?

            The way I see it they either run the company, in which case they own the blame for a company’s failures, or they are just a figurehead with no real influence, in which case they don’t need to be paid any more than the actors the marketing team hires to be in their commercials.

            • Carrolade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              It’s actually between those two extremes. It’s in the name, Chief Executive Officer. They’re essentially there to execute the will of the ownership. They manage the company.

              edit: To further expand on that, it’s not too different from the executive of a country. While they make a lot of decisions, one thing they don’t deserve blame for is any laws passed by the legislature. It’s not a perfect analogy, but it captures the basic idea.

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        8 days ago

        CEOs often are paid primarily in stock, so more than likely this guy had a significant ownership stake.

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        If the CEO disagrees with the directions of the board, the CEO has a number of options. They can easily be considered culpable.