Summary

Over 250 branded drugs in the U.S. will see price increases starting Jan. 1, 2025, with most hikes below 10% and a median increase of 4.5%.

Key companies like Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Sanofi are raising prices on treatments for COVID-19, cancer, and vaccines, citing R&D costs and inflation.

Some prices, such as Merck’s diabetes drugs, will be reduced.

Critics highlight that U.S. drug prices remain the highest globally, while manufacturers face pressure to moderate year-over-year price hikes.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    The line must go up. Doesn’t matter that homelessness increased 18% in 2024 in the US. They need that third home and a yacht.

      • Landless2029@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        9 days ago

        Its almost like dragons and thier hoards. Just keep piling it up…

        But they’re not magestic like dragons. Still close… Lizard people? Cold blooded. Predatory. It tracks.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m back to complain about Australians looking at Medicare through rose tinted glasses, when it still has a lot left to be desired.

      PBS is one of the better parts of Medicare, however, there is very often a gap fee, even for PBS medication, unless you qualify for a health care card. Which is great because we’re taking care of people who can’t afford it, and the gap fee is still mostly fine, in most cases.

      I mean, look at the sign, has an Asterix right there.

      However, the rest of Medicare is more and more resembling a two-tiered system where you get to skip the queue if you have the means to pay, and you get a tax break to do so 👍 and of course, can’t forget our luxury bones which still aren’t covered.

      Please do not vote for the LNP, I beg you.

      Medicare is not that great compared to what we could afford as one of the richest countries per capita in the world. Only in comparison to the shitshow in the US.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Thank you!

          Countdown? Nobody on Wiki or that one social news site has talked about the origin of that name from what I can tell. Countdown what?

  • EmpatheticTeddyBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    9 days ago

    That’s a bold move. We should get confirmation that the CEOs are aware of this. We should also get confirmation that they signed off on this. And a photo op with said people too, you know, for prosperity…

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    9 days ago

    We’re all getting 10% raises to pay for this, right?

    Well, at least the people these companies employ (not just the executives) are getting 10% raises, right?

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Now now, I think you know these fine American institutions won’t be passing up another opportunity to raise prices once those tariffs hit. This is a double dip.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    See, this is why “Biden brought down drug prices. For 10 drugs. For Boomers only.” Isn’t a win.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      “But did you think those boomers needed to pay $5 less for medicine? That’s a win! Now let’s have millions die of preventable illness because healthcare is a heavy tax burden on the middle class.”

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 days ago

      Guess who footed the bill for all that emergency Covid R&D a few years ago? Hint - it was not the pharmaceutical companies.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well, the argument is that they need to cover new R&D costs

      Know what industry has higher R&D costs than pharmaceuticals? Chips.

      And my computers aren’t going up that much