• WarmSoda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          If that’s chatGPT it’s supposedly programed to stop looking further at a site when it encounters a captcha. So that response would make sense.

          • candybrie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            The “requires human intelligence and perception to solve” after having just solved it at least feels a little sardonic.

      • Buttons@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        At this rate Skynet will be like “I’m going to nuke the world on X data, I’ve already taken over all the launch computers, but I’m not going to tell you or it would ruin my plans.”

        These LLMs “think” by generating text, and we can see what that text is. It reminds me of this scene from Westworld (NSFW, nudity): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnxJRYit44k

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      In fairness, that style of captcha has been broken for a while, hence why they’re not still in use.

    • Snowman44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      ChatGPT just want Mr. Incredible on you.

      I’d like to tell you that the captcha says overlooks and inquiry, but I can’t. I’m sorry ma’am. I know you’re upset. I’d like to help you, but I can’t.

    • KluEvo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      huh

      That… Actually seems like not that bad of an idea (at least for forum/reddit/lemmy bots)

      Well, if you ignore the infeasibility aspect of getting the humans to cooperate and stuff

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, if you ignore the infeasibility aspect of getting the humans to cooperate and stuff

        Don’t you fucking tell me what to do!

        gets mace

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wasn’t that basically the intention behind the Upvote and Downvote systems in Lemmy, StackExchange/Overflow, Reddit, or old YouTube? The idea being that helpful, constructive comments would get pushed to the top, whereas unhelpful or spam comments get pushed to the bottom (and automatically hidden).

        It’s just that it didn’t really work out quite the same way in practice due to botting, people gaming the votes, or the votes not being used as expected.

        • Greenskye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep the flaw is assuming that humans would actually select for constructive comments. It’s a case where humans claim that’s what they want, but human actions do not reflect this. We’d eventually build yet another ‘algorithm that picks what immediately appeals to most users’ rather than ‘constructive’. You’d also see the algorithm splinter along ideological lines as people tend to view even constructive comments from ideologies they disagree with unfavorably

          • d3Xt3r@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s just a flaw in implementation. Look at the system implemented by Slashdot, still works to this day.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Bots on Reddit already steal parts of upvoted comments and post them elsewhere in the same post to get upvotes themselves (so the account can be used for spam later)

        Even with context they can be very difficult to spot sometimes.

      • new_guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        But what if someone else makes a bot not to answer things but to rate randomly if an answer is constructive or not?

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Is it really such a bad thing when the humans that are unable to cooperate do not get access?

        • Baketime@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The title text on the comic

          And what about all the people who won’t be able to join the community because they’re terrible at making helpful and constructive co- … oh.

        • KluEvo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sometimes you might need an urgent answer (eg, overflowing sink or a weird smell coming from an appliance problem) and don’t have time to fill out a serious form

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone knows that the real purpose of CAPTCHA tests are to train computers to replace us.

    • hex@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This but unironically… The purpose literally is to train computers to get better at recognising things

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And also to frustrate people who use anonimization techniques including use of the Tor Network to get them to turn off their protections to be more easily fingerprinted.

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The funniest part of that is the people designing the AI systems seem to be completely oblivious to the fact that they’re slowly but surely trying to eliminate their own species. ☹️

      • sheogorath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.

  • Overzeetop@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is considerable overlap between the smartest AI and the dumbest humans. The concerns over bears and trash cans in US National Parks was ahead of its time.

  • tacosplease@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just encountered a captcha yesterday that I had to refresh several times and then listen to the audio playback. The letters were so obscured by a black grid that it was impossible to read them.

  • casualhippo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    We all knew this day would come, now it’s just a matter of making different captcha tests to evade these bots

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve found that a lot of sites use captchas or captcha-like systems as a means of frustrating users as a way of keeping away certain people that they don’t want to access the site (intellectual property owners), though it’s not the only tactic that they use. I mean it works, pretty much all of those sites are still up today, despite serving data that’s copyrighted by Nintendo, Sony, and other parties.

    • Fat Tony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      New Captcha question: Does pressing a controller’s button harder make the character’s action more impactful?

      if answer = yes : human

      if answer = no : bot

  • C4d@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought Captcha tests were being used to train image recognition systems no?

    • Odelay42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but that’s more of a side quest for the system. Primary use case has always been security.

      • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Maybe. Or maybe it was always about using millions of hours of free labor to tune their algorithms and “bot detection” was just how they marketed it to the people that added it to their sites. Makes me wonder who was running the bots that needed to be protected against. Exacerbate the problem then solve the problem and get what you really want.

  • Rhaedas@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    So just keep the existing tests and change the passing ones to not get access. Checkmate robots.

    Just kidding, I welcome our robot overlords…I’ll act as your captcha gateway.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    So is it time to get rid of them then? Usually when I encounter one of those “click the motorcycles” I just go read something else.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a double-edged sword. Just because it doesn’t work perfectly doesn’t mean it doesn’t work.

      To a spammer, building something with the ability to break a captcha is more expensive than something that cannot, whether in terms of development time, or resource demands.

      We saw with a few Lemmy instances that they’re still good at protecting instances from bots and bot signups. Removing captchas entirely means erasing that barrier of entry that keeps a lot of bots out, and might cause more problems than it fixes.

      • IAm_A_Complete_Idiot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Problem is this assumes that everyone has to build their own captcha solver. It’s definitely a bare minimum standard barrier to entry, but it’s really not a sustainable solution to begin with.

  • Kichae@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bots picking the questions, bots answering them. They clearly understand whatever the fuck the captcha bot thinks a bus is better than I do.

  • sprl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve had to do 15 different captcha tests one after the other and they still wouldn’t validate me today.