Summary

Several U.S. states have enacted laws requiring pornography sites, such as PornHub, to implement age verification to prevent minors’ access, prompting the site’s parent company, Aylo, to block access in affected states.

Proponents argue these laws protect children, while critics highlight privacy risks, inefficiencies, and potential censorship.

These measures reflect growing social conservatism, with some advocates aiming to restrict adult content broadly.

While privacy-focused age verification methods exist, regulatory clarity is lacking.

Critics warn these laws may suppress responsible platforms, favoring unregulated alternatives, and escalate broader culture wars around sexuality and LGBTQ+ rights.

  • Nate Cox@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    18 days ago

    With this method, users take a photo of their face which is then analyzed by AI to estimate their age. Tombs says this involves no analysis of the user’s actual identity, and that all photos are deleted once the check is finished. Hence, neither Yoti nor the porn site ever needs to know who you are.

    No. Fuck no. Just… wow.

    • DurbanPoison@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      I rate they’re intending to keep those photos, but will stop when an exec with a little bit of humanity has a change of heart after checking the database when he realises he is looking into the eyes of a unkempt man with visible depression who is going to spend the next 15 minutes trying to settle on a video and another two minutes masturbating.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        when an exec with a little bit of humanity has a change of heart

      • Nate Cox@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        18 days ago

        It might stop when the DB gets compromised and some exec gets threatened with the release of all his weird kinks going public.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      What stops you from taking a picture of a picture of some random adult’s face?

      • Nate Cox@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 days ago

        Fuck that rando, I guess?

        Just generate a fake face with some generative tool.

        Or, you know, be as appalled by this as I am and complain loudly. Maybe if enough of us do it it’ll become more trouble than it’s worth.

        • Eheran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 days ago

          Yes, for example. Not sure what the “why” is supposed to be for? At what point to you disagree?

          • twack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            18 days ago

            I meant that there’s no need to fool the ai, the system is fundamentally flawed from the start.

            • Eheran@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              So to you it is not fooling the AI if you present someone else? Where would fooling start?

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          In my experience these type of verifications require you to look forward, then to the right, then to the left, acquiring a 3 dimensional data plot. Which cannot be done with a picture. Maybe if you had 3 pictures.

          “Why does your son carry around a mannequin?”