Summary

Americans are posting videos about 3D-printed guns on the Chinese video app RedNote, despite the content being illegal in China.

While some users are uncomfortable with the topic, others see it as an opportunity for cultural exchange.

The future of TikTok remains uncertain as the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the ban.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    As much as I hate people going to an even more security disaster of an app, the amount of “fuck you” energy I’ve been seeing from everyone that’s moved over there is so god damn funny.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    americans and bringing guns places they absolutely shouldn’t be, name a better duo

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Tiananmen Square is like, a huge tourist attraction and plaza near their equivalent of the White House and other important government complexes I’m sure they’ve seen a ton of photos of it. They hold national events there.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You know that’s not what they mean.

          But sure, you go ahead and post this “tourist” photo on RedNote and see what happens. Please do report back to us.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              No, I don’t think we would get along since you both blame me in specific for something the entire moderation team across the entire server has been told to do and for upholding Lemmy.world’s Terms of Service so that illegal things to say in The Netherlands don’t get the server shut down.

              Sorry, I don’t get along with people who blame me for things like that, but I wonder what you would say if I died tomorrow and those comments still got moderated (since they absolutely would)? Blame my ghost?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  And, there are two sides sweetie, for or against the ruling class.

                  I see you’re still enjoying your white and heterosexual privilege.

                  When are you going to give me that legitimate email address?

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Look man, I just don’t see why my 6 year old shouldn’t be able to bring his sawed off in his back pack. If someone tries to shoot up the school he’ll be able to defend his class. I always tell him to keep 1 chambered just in case.

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    China mods:

    I was not ready for this flavor of shitposting

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    3D printed guns are a meme. Most of them require parts of functional guns such as the barrels, And they require regular ammunition.

    • Hathaway@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Electro chemical machining can make a barrel.

      But, idk how any of what you said makes them a “meme”. You can buy a barrel online for cheap, also ammo, and I don’t have to go through a government check. That’s what a lot of these people want to avoid.

      • scoobford@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        In most countries, the barrel or other pressures bearing parts are the regulated piece. We are the weird ones for regulating receivers instead.

        • Hathaway@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well, the article references Americans, I’m American, so okay?

          Europeans can also get guns mailed to their front door, are we just comparing gun laws?

          • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Europeans can also get guns mailed to their front door, are we just comparing gun laws?

            I mean, there’s a lot of context surrounding licensing and pre-approval to get that mail order heater in Europe. Local laws vary, yadda yadda

            And if you collect old guns and have a C&R license, you too can get guns delivered to your door in America.

            • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              In the UK you can also purchase a pistol with bitcoin on the dark web and have it delivered to a train station locker, but that is not legal at all.

            • Hathaway@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh yeah, 1000%. Also, with a C&R license, you’re not legally purchasing a “firearm”. It’s a curio or relic, but yeah, point still stands.

              Also, none of that has anything to do with the discussion at hand, which was sorta my point.

              • nerdyshades@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I have my 03-FFL, and “Curio & Relic” is a classification that firearms can fall into, defined as firearms manufactured 50-years or more ago. Legally, by definition, you are still purchasing a firearm. You’ve just had more background checks to bypass some of the rules in most states about transfers, if the firearm you are buying qualifies as a “Curio & Relic”.

          • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            It mentions sending videos about them to China. Where most of those videos are useless because the parts and ammo are not sold there.

              • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Okay so a lot of work to create the barrel, but the gun still takes 9mm ammunition. And if someone in China can get their hands on ammo they can get their hands on a gun.

                • Hathaway@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Okay? I don’t know what you’re arguing here? 3D printed guns aren’t a meme. Some don’t require any regulated parts. I don’t care if the average Chinese person can or will get their hands on one. You can just say you didn’t know what you were talking about when you said 3d printed guns are a “meme”. It’s not that deep

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Electro chemical machining can make a barrel.

        Yes, but that’s not 3d printing any more.

        It’s a separate process requiring separate tools, materials and skills.

        • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          But you can make anything with that additional process. SO it’s going to be difficult for a government to lock down those additional processes.

          • mycelium underground@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I can make barrels and stuff like that on a milling machine and a lathe. Not just shitty parts but better than most big manufacturers put out. Government can’t control manufacturing.

            Still not 3d printing.

            edit: Typo

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Barrels require rifling. It is fairly difficult to manually create the groove as it requires a lot of tooling. Not impossible. But not something people will do to create a single gun. Only the barrel would be more work than assembling the rest of the gun.

        Purchased ammo and other parts are specific to the US. 3D printed guns give people the illusion that they can make the entire gun using a 3d printer and off the shelf consumer parts. But most 3d printed guns are made by buying all the required metal parts for guns and printing out the exterior.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      The part you can easily print, however, is the receiver.

      The receiver is the part that’s legally a firearm. While I think it’s neat I can customize my firearms, I do acknowledge that someone who is prohibited from owning a gun can very easily print a receiver and order the rest of the parts from Palmetto State Armory to get a perfectly-functional firearm without any background check being performed.

      I also don’t know the solution to the problem though. As 3D printing, desktop CNC, and other forms of DIY manufacturing improve in quality and decrease in price, it will be very hard to regulate home-brew weapons.

    • lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Which you can get without the same screening process for buying an actual gun.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or the metal parts needed to make a “3d printed gun” function as anything other than a random suicide generator.

        You can’t print 100% of a functional gun on a consumer printer unless you are willing to accept it blowing up in your hand after a shot or 2.

        • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not actually true anymore but they’re not very performant.

          Fine for a handgun to kill someone up close with, but it’s not like making a machine to dohickey someone a la Abe is very difficult.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          If you have a 3d printer, and a bit of electrical know how, you can actually machine most of the metal parts.

          • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Trying to machine parts for a gun with “a bit of electrical know how” sounds like suicide by stupidity to me. Especially if you’re going to DIY the ammo as well…

  • yamper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    look, this content isn’t getting censored! it must be because rednote is Good, not that it didn’t have the english speaking moderation resources

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s funny how when something’s going offline it’s easy for people to just switch apps even if the barrier to switching is extremely high (like having to learn a new language high). Makes it seem almost like…maybe people are fine with the shitty politics on the garbage sites and it isn’t really about the switching costs after all.

    • Mrfiddles@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can’t look at switching costs in a vacuum. The real metric is the Expected Return. When the original app is going to remain open, there is a very high risk that, ultimately, most of the users you care about aren’t going to make the switch. Even if the switching costs are low, the ER is negative because the most likely outcome is that you waste your time trying to migrate to a new platform that doesn’t really take off.

      When the original app might stop existing then the calculus switches and even a high cost option is worth it because the odds are much higher that your efforts will pay off.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The US is gonna ban RedNote so fast. Watch and see. A special session of Congress. Matching funds on bribes to the Supreme Court.

    They can’t let this go unchecked.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It won’t get banned because it does not directly compete with Facebook. It will however have some changes in China I’m sure.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s up to the president now.

      The bill basically says, “if the president thinks a foreign government controls an app that could be bad, he can ban it.” Section im referring to: “(2) a social media company that is controlled by a foreign adversary country and determined by the President to present a significant threat to national security”


      Actual law: DIVISION H-- PROTECTING AMERICANS FROM FOREIGN ADVERSARY CONTROLLED APPLICATIONS ACT

      Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act

      (Sec. 2) This division prohibits distributing, maintaining, updating, or providing internet hosting services for a foreign adversary controlled application (e.g., TikTok). However, the prohibition does not apply to a covered application that executes a qualified divestiture as determined by the President.

      Under the division, a foreign adversary controlled application is an application directly or indirectly operated by (1) ByteDance, Ltd., TikTok, their subsidiaries, successors, related entities they control, or entities controlled by a foreign adversary country; or (2) a social media company that is controlled by a foreign adversary country and determined by the President to present a significant threat to national security. (Here, a social media company excludes any website or application primarily used to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews.)


      Sidenote: I’m fairly certain that means the law would not allow the President to ban a social media site run via activity pub and hosted by the people, because it is not controlled by a foreign government.

  • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Americans are posting videos about 3D-printed guns

    Cultural Exchange

    It’s always cute seeing yanks try and act like one of the big boy countries, talking about their “Culture”

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s always cute seeing yanks try and act like one of the big boy countries, talking about their “Culture”

      Lmao please share which “superior culture” you’re from