• jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    5 months ago

    Lots of peoole didn’t read the article

    According to the text of the measure, the state would be required to create a 20-member state commission to study California’s viability as an independent country in 2027 and to publish a report the following year.

    If the ballot question is approved, the proposal would declare a “vote of no confidence in the United States of America”, but would not change the state’s government or its relationship with the U.S. The measure would also call for the removal of the U.S. flag from all state buildings.

  • ALQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Y’know, as unrealistic as this (probably? I’m not really sure of anything, anymore) is, seeing this pop up in my scrolling gave me a bit of relief. I’ve been so terrified and angry and anxious and unsure of the (immediate) future that it’s practically paralyzed me. Knowing that this pipedream is there helped me breathe for a moment. I’ll take what relief I can get right now.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Ah yes, because Brexit was such a success, demonstrating that this clearly would solve all your problems 😬

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why would we though? There has and would be no break betwesn the original Bear Flag Revolt and the modern California Republic. We could definitely create CR Rangers tbough.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Okay, but then California becomes a smaller country bordering a much larger fascist neighbor with the largest military in the world.

    In what world is that a good outcome?

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’d become a pretty large country with one of the world’s largest economies holding major port access to their neighbor. A few allies and things aren’t quite so clear cut. Not to mention they’d potentially have significant military resources.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That economy is tightly integrated with the rest of the country.
        In a secession, those ties would be severed, likely tanking the economy of both California and the US.

        • theherk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s definitely possible. I’m not saying it would be a good thing. The only thing I feel confident about is that we do not know. A lot isn’t as it once seemed right now. Dogs and cats living together! Mass hysteria!

      • cristo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Esperanto
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you think the US military wouldn’t immediately remove all assets from California you’d be sorely mistaken. There is no way that the fed would allow assets like that to be given away to a successionist movement. Even if they didn’t, California doesn’t have the logistic ability to maintain those assets for more than id say 3 months.

        • theherk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          If you think you know exactly how all installations, including National Guard Installations, would operate in a situation of this magnitude, I envy your blind certitude.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If they do start to secede or actually secede than it just becomes an expensive and complicated mess that doesn’t help anyone. Because even if they are forced back then the larger federation has to work ten times harder to keep them in place and cooperative and in the end becomes a net negative where they have to decide if it’s cheaper to let go or keep paying to stay together.

      Ask a Canadian what it means because we’ve had that discussion many times with Quebec and less often with other regions. It’s far cheaper for everyone to be cooperative and mutually benefiting one another on good terms than to threaten anyone into a corner … and even when things are working, it’s still not easy.

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Oregon and Washington would probably do the same if California seceded. (Which it won’t). If BC Canada left, Cascadia would be a thing that is large and prosperous enough to stand on it’s own. That or the three states just join Canada.

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    God dammit I find this so fucking hilarious. Every time a Republican wins you’ll inevitably see an article talking about California is to leave. And on the flip side every time we get a Democrat in office fuckin Texas starts bitching and tryna leave.

    I’m not going to say it’ll never happen, but I would be willing to bet all the 7 dollars I have to my name that it’s not gonna happen.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well in fairness, the pendulum keeps swinging farther with each new administration. So the split is never going to happen until it does. No way to know if this is the time or not. But unless something happens to break the cycle of more and more extremism, their will be a serious attempt at a split eventually. Weather it results in some kind of civil war where one side forces the other to stay, or a split actually happens is also unknowable.

  • Tug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s nice to think about taking your ball and going home. However, if we denigrate Texas everytime they threaten to secede we really shouldn’t be giving California a pass.

    Edit- fix fat finger spelling

    • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t denigrate Texas every time they say they’re gonna secede. In fact, I want them to. If they don’t want to be a part of America, then let them go do their own thing. If that turns out to be a bad move for them, then that’s on them.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Something that might work out better and would be a lot easier to do (thought still not very easy), would be to split into 3 (or 4?) states.

    California has almost 12% of the US population concentrated in that one state! By far most of the states contain about 2% or less of the US population each.

    By splitting, the population would be better represented in the Senate with 6 senators between them instead of only 2, and there might be a net gain in some other benefits that are given on the state level.

    edit: I see that someone had already brought this idea up, but IMO it’s a good idea that they should seriously consider!

    • ModestMeme@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The right wing has wanted this for years because California is very conservative outside of its cities. Splitting the state up would guarantee a Republican Senate.

    • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Careful. Texas has some long forgotten provision where they could easily do the same thing, into 5 states. and they’d all be red.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        If they split California into 3, the northern state might be red (or swing) but the other two would definitely be blue because of SR and LA. Look at a map of election results by county.

        With Texas, at least a couple of them would have to be blue because some would contain the blue urban areas. Same with FL, at least one new state would be blue. if CA, TX, and FL all did it. If they divided into 5 states it might even out. Of course there would have to be negotiations to get enough people and the parties to agree to the boundaries, which should prevent too much of an advantage to one side or the other, especially if people don’t want their cities be split between two states.

        But regardless of the results for the Senate, the point is that the people in most populous states of this country are not getting their fair representation in our federal government and that needs to change.

        Then of course as long as we’re altering our makeup of states, we have to give the citizens DC representation and make that a state. And Puerto Rico should be able to decide if it wants to become a state as well.

        • McWizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          German here, so excuse my ignorance, but wouldn’t it be easier to change the voting system to one that counts each vote as equal on a state level and get rid of the voting people stuff? Last time I checked you’re no longer riding horses to Washington…

          • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            but wouldn’t it be easier to change the voting system to one that counts each vote as equal on a state level and get rid of the voting people stuff

            Country wide that requires a constitutional amendment, which requires 2/3 of all states to agree. It’s been tried, the cuckservatives rage and bitch like the children they are because it would mean they’d never win again, so it never goes through

            There’s an effort to make it so that individual states will ignore the EC called NAPOVOINTERCO that would basically force the US to use a popular vote system, but it’s not got enough individual states signed on yet to activate itself

            When it comes to the US, this is a simple rule to follow: federal change is nearly impossible because of the babies in the GOP, while states are easier but can change a whole lot less overall

    • Desert Hermit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The State of Jefferson would have started this process, but WWII got in the way. Except that was all predicated on being super racist.

      I think if you get a legit Cal3 proposal, you might end up with a Cal4 where they pull from the six-state version where “Silicon Valley” is its own state shows up so that there can be some technopolis with custom laws and insane cost of living. Essentially, turning SFO into another Manhattan.

      I would never move back to CA as it is, but if there was a breakup, I might actually go for it.

      • peregrin5@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The racists all wanted to leave the US because it wasn’t racist enough. However now the racists are in power and they don’t want to leave anymore.

  • Meursault@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes, please. As a Californian who is already looking to move abroad, it would be a dream come true for my state to do it for me.

      • Meursault@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        My heart goes out to the rational minority in the red states. My advice to them is to leave while they can, however they can. This very well could be a matter of life and death.

        • HeroHelck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          5 months ago

          Your heart goes out to us, how sweet, I’ll think of your heart when me and my friends who cannot leave are rounded up and sent to camps.

          • Meursault@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            “Cannot leave?” My brother in Christ. If I honestly thought that my life was genuinely in danger of a violent end, should I remain where I am, I’d leave without hesitation. It costs nothing to get in your car and drive until you are across state lines RIGHT NOW, this very instant. I wouldn’t worry about selling my house, closing escrow (or trying to communicate or formalize anything with a landlord, were I renting), “getting my affairs in order”, or whatever else. I would first load up my car and then GTFO right goddamn NOW while I still draw breath. Yes, it’d be a hassle having to deal with those loose ends later, but my first priority would be my own self-preservation.

            • HeroHelck@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              No, I think I’ll stay and try to protect whoever I can. I’ll probably get killed, I’ve more or less made peace with that.

              • Meursault@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                That’s at least a stance I can admire. Keep yourself and your loved ones safe. And if it comes to it, you show those fascists what hell looks like when it wears the skin of a gentle human.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Look, I’ve got no dog in this fight, but in my opinion, something you need to make peace with is that the people in blue states have to watch out for themselves too, before the rot spreads too far and they find the modern day Gestapo on their own streets, killing their own people.

            And if/when they do split, try to understand them, and blame the fascists, not those trying to escape from fascism.

            Either way, if your life is threatened by fascists, I hope you’ll survive and make it out. If you don’t, I hope you’ll put up a good fight, but that’s up to you to decide, not me. I wish the best to all of you and hope that here in Europe we won’t decide to follow through on the whole right-wing swing of the pendulum.

  • Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago
    1. Brexit was clever wordplay, every proposal since hasn’t been. Fuckin “Calexit”, do better.

    2. Yeah, you don’t get to just leave a country. Believe it or not, there was actually at least one war about that!

    3. Fuck CBS for their cancer ass website.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Likely.
      Russia’s goal isn’t to support Republicans.
      Russia’s goal is to support anything and everything that splits the USA and NATO apart.

  • dilroopgill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Itd never happen but secessions not an unpopular opinion whenever it’s mentioned here, only republicans that have repeatedly said they want to leave and move out hate the idea for some reason

  • Alex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Fight for better more fair representation, secession solves nothing.

    • Cryan24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It will take a massive chunk out of federal funding to reduce states most of whom don’t pull equal weight