• takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly, we have UPS, FedEx, DHL and bunch of others.

      Leave USPS the fuck alone.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d bet he wants to take over Amtrak so he can replace it with that stupid Las Vegas car tunnel.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or replace it with nothing, because “railways and mass transit are obsolete” (translation: “they’re hurting my car sales”).

    • Davin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everything that has been privatized, has ended up costing us more for shittier service. This will not be different.

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The usps is a government SERVICE. These parasites look at that and say “but nobody profits from that” and somehow they just can’t let that happen.

    • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The thing is they did generate a profit until they were fucked with by Republicans to make them look unprofitable.

      • Maiq@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        There isn’t a functioning part of our government that the regressives wont destroy for private profit.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still can’t get over the idea of for profit prisons. incentivized incarceration is beyond stupid.

    • Airowird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except the taxpayers benefit from it, who are the ones paying for it anyway!

      What Chancellor Musk means is that no oligarch is getting rich from it, so he is unable to understand its purpose.

  • AntY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember seeing an interview with Margaret Thatcher where she said that rail could never be successfully privatized. Just as a reminder of how extreme Musk’s ideas are.

    • coyootje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They more or less did that here in the Netherlands. Once the government let go, things slowly started getting worse and we’re now at the point where I’d say things are expensive, occasionally sporty and suboptimal…

    • Melonpoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Japan seems to have done it, no idea what the people over there think about its service and affordability though.

  • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    They already tried this in LA with privatizing the public transportation system back in the 50’s. The big car companies bought it all and dismantled it in favor of selling their cars.

    Most of Amtrak loses money except for the NE corridor. So if you privatize Amtrak it means even worse service and eventually no trains where it is not profitable.

    Same with privatization of the USPS, it just means less services for a higher price until they decide to close it altogether because email will replace letters altogether. Say good by to any privacy since all email is monitored and capitalized for marketing.

    Fuck fElon Muskrat.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I had no idea it wasn’t private. What’s the deal with that?

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Passenger rail was faillling across the country. Pretty much every private rail company was going out of business.

          Amtrak was the rescue plan. Sounds good right? Amtrak took ownership of a bunch of money losing routes across the US and were required to keep the nationwide service. No track (except northeast), no reliable government funding. Can’t decrease service. Can’t raise fares much. No way back to profitability.

          The additional funding signed by Biden was the way back. Currently Amtrak is profitable on the Northeast Corridor only, and that funds the rest of the system. Even that has several choke points that are over 100 years old. They desperately need upgraded infrastructure in order to function. That funding also included increased service in a few places, to try to make it useful to someone. All too much of Amtrak is useless stuff like one train per day. Of course they’re not selling any tickets

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I knew it was kinda of poorly designed, I remember the rails aren’t smooth enough for commuter traffic but we did it anyway.

              • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s fine at slower speeds but the track is so old that the trains can’t go very fast. Also, most of the track in America is owned by private freight rail companies which means AmTrack has to wait for the freight trains to go by and that increases the amount of time a train trip takes.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It also means the tracks owner has no incentive to keep things up enough to make the ride smooth or to allow fast trains. Cargo can be slow and bumpy

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my country since the government privatized a part of postal service, the quality of service heavily declined to the point that now is almost guaranteed that they will “lose” your letter if you send it in a place that will cost too much to deliver

    • coaxil@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think a much smaller object with much much greater velocity it’s referable.

    • wanderwisley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Definitely, I live in a very rural area of the country I think it might be one of the most rural places in the lower 48 states. And we heavily depend on the postal service to get things that we simply don’t have here. This will totally cripple my town and 99% of the people here will blame it on woke.

  • MasterNerd@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a surprise given the fuckery he pulled with Hyperloop and California high speed rail

  • Bathilda_Bagshot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    They want to eliminate or control the Postal Service so that they can eliminate mail-in voting. Their added bonus is padding the pockets of fellow millionaires and billionaires.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    This has been a fever dream of Republicans for my entire life. Looks like they just may get it this time.

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    At this point. How could anyone care or take seriously anything Musk or Trump spits. It’s all lies and bullshit.