I think progressives never thought about this because we banked on immigration and demographic change allowing us to win culturally and electorally but the issue is immigrants tend to be overwhelmingly male, that is how Trump won actually he won over a lot of Hispanic,Black,Asian and indigenous men who feel humiliated by a new culture, economy and world.

So what can we do rhetorically and policy wise to win more young men over ?

  • Texas_Hangover@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Quit trying to make young white men feel guilty for existing. I come from poor white trash. As near as I can tell, my family never benefitted from slavery in any possible way. So fuck you. I dont feel bad about something I didn’t do, no one in my family did, and we aint gonna pay for it.

  • Smeagol666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Promote and get behind actual progressive candidates, not corporatist shills like Hillary or Kamala. I like Kshama Sawant because she calls shit like she sees it.

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Education. You will never be able to explain taxes in a way that can counter propaganda if the person is an idiot. You just won’t. And until then it’s an uphill battle.

  • cook_pass_babtridge@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Talk about issues that affect the working class. Not the white working class, not working class men, just everyone who makes a living by drawing a wage. Progressive movements are formed by solidarity, and we have more in common with other working class people than any of the politicians or business leaders who set the tone of this debate.

  • darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Well it would be a good starting point if we actually had progressive politicians. The Democrats lose because they have no substantive platform for actually helping people because doing that would go against their donors. To be clear, it’s the same for Republicans. There’s a reason why the government just ping pongs between the two parties. The only reliable base either party has is the one that’s more culturally aligned with them, whatever that means at the time.

    If they literally ever credibly ran on basic issues like housing, food, healthcare and the elections were fair, they would win. But they don’t, because they can’t, so they will never have consistent support.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A good politic should not be sold.

    People should chose it by themselves because that’s the best thing for them.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        And the best way to vote against your interest is vote just by following propaganda instead of thinking by themselves what they should do.

        Thinking on “how to sell” instead of “what do they need from us” (or even better “what do they tell us to do”) is setting a path for people not thinking and just following propaganda, which makes them more susceptible for falling into other parties propaganda.

        The path for good democracy is not enlightened despotism. Is not the representatives telling the people what to do, is the people telling representatives what to do.

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          That’s why it’s important to be able to convey your message so people know what you are trying to accomplish with the 2000 page bill

          • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            And what if what you try to accomplish or the way you try to do it is not the way they want it done?

            A common problem with the left movements these days is that they put more effort in convincing that in listening, because everyone who becomes politically active automatically thinks they know better than everyone else.

            • BussyCat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Then you don’t get elected…

              What I find funny is I have the exact opposite opinion that the left spends more time trying to appeal to voters than actually communicate what they are trying to do. So we end up with things like 250B to boost American manufacturing that got completely ignored

              • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Maybe no political party should have more than 5% of the votes. The fact that 50% of the population could agree on all issues doesn’t feel possible to me.

              • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Why you change my words?

                Anyway, they think they know, but they don’t. They don’t know better than anyone else, due the nature of politics their opinion on matters should not have any more weight than the common folk, that’s why we chose democracy as a form of government anyway. If we do not believe in the fact that everyone opinion matter the samy I don’t know why would we pretend it does, let’s stablish an aristocracy and be done with it.

                • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Everyone’s opinions don’t matter the same. If I take the time and energy to understand a topic, my opinion has more weight than Joe Schmo who looked it up on Facebook. As Isaac Asimov said:

                  Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.’

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Help them to break down. Encourage them to be soft and show them that that softness is strength. So many of these young men are like this because they feel alone. We need to bring them together in positive ways.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I don’t follow the media and the debate where you live, but over here left leaning politicians and media tends to frame it as: women, minorites etc have a problem. Men are the problem.

    You’re basically pushing any undecided man over to the right.

    • iarigby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      liberal politicians and liberal MSM frame it that way, because they have nothing else to offer but toxic culture wars.

    • Luffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      So we should lie?

      Men are the problem. The patriarchy, the racism, the discrimination? Men.

      And if you are too braindead to understand this, you’re too far gone anyway.

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You can’t have a post like this and then wonder “Why do so many men go to the right?”

        Maybe men are sick of being painted with a broad brush. We all have our own thoughts, beliefs and feelings.

        • Luffy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’m not payed, I just don’t see a reality where we can improve the world and not mention the hundreds of years of oppression by men at the same time, which, as you already said, will drive away the republicans. So you really gotta start thinking „should we ignore the obvious problem why woman are to this day fighting for human rights so we can find a compromise with Nazis?” and my answer is obviously no.

          • zxqwas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            You should be paid because you’re basically campaigning for the republicans.You don’t drive away any core republican voter, they would never vote D. You drive away the ones who voted democrat last election.

  • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    This is all from the perspective of a non-american from a country where thankfully we are still liberal at heart and only entertain some progressive ideas, instead of buying it wholesale, meaning the right has yet to completely cannibalise the government over the mistakes of the left.

    1. Move away from equity and return to equality of opportunity as the main goal. Equity demands lack of competition, and men love competition.

    You can want everyone to receive equal opportunity and dignity, but people are not equal and will not end in the same place once the race is over. You can’t demand equality of outcome and onboard the most competitive demographic, there is a reason if the stereotype of leftist men is passive wimps. This is completely compatible with prgressive ideas, but it’s incompatible with progressive brains, apparently.

    1. Actually understand what intersectionality looks like, stop treating it like a hierarchy of oppression.

    The core idea of intersectionality is that each demographic has its own issues and they manifest differently if more demographics overlap in the same individual (e.g. sexism against white women vs sexism against black women exhibit different tropes and connotations).

    This does not mean whoever has the least minoritary traits is the most acceptable target, that is some marxist “oppressor vs oppressed” horseshit and, while it was probably the intended idea, it is massively counterproductive and doesn’t have to be the actual application of the issue.

    Men have issues that women don’t have, women have issues that men don’t have. As soon as your movement decides to prioritise one they have lost the other.

    The reason this does not happen with race is that no movement in the US can realistically exist politically without white people simply by virtue of how huge the white slice of the demo pie is, and because this whole thing was started by highly educated, economically mobile, overwhelingly white, college grads who live in very specific coastal bubbles, hence the endemic hatred of farmers and factory workers, the actual working class of the US, as hicks and racists, and the lionisation of serving staff like baristas and waiters (the only working class most large city dwellers ever interact with).

    1. Move away from “patriarchy”.

    It’s just a fucking L on its face isn’t it? “Yes come join the party that thinks men being in power is the problem” fat fucking chance lol.

    And when they do join, the parodies write themselves.

    I don’t care if you think it’s “just a name” (especially in light of what progs consistently do over “just a name” and “just a statue” and so on) it’s a massive optics L that shows all of the horseshit about microaggressions and non-confrontational language and whatnot are entirely performative.

    You have the most obvious othering language in the core ideas of the movement and then complain about microaggressions? And you wonder why people don’t take you seriously?

    And while we’re on that:

    1. Politeness is baseline, respect is earned. Confrontation is necessary and men are more likely to thrive in confrontational spaces.

    You can’t have a political movement that does not tolerate dissent and confrontation, or only tolerates it in one direction. See the implosion of the “Unfuck america tour” as a good example of this.

    The whole point of politics is to create a critical mass of people who align on some goal to push for it, you don’t have to agree with them on every point, if you had enough people who agree with you, you would be already in the majority and would not need to participate in politics.

    Easy example from the last decade: TERFs.

    Now, I don’t like TERFs, on account of them being radfems and thus automatically hostile to me due to the circumstances of my birth (i.e. penis), but you know what? I reckon they probably want women to have better salaries and fewer barriers to entry into professional fields.

    Let them force themselves into political irrelevance if they refuse to play ball, don’t make a big fucking show of kicking them out of the movement, because then you end up on the back foot of having to explain “trans women are women” to the mass population and the TERFs simply need to say “look at these brainwashed biology deniers, they think males and females have no differences” and you end up eating your own ass in public, when the point is that trans women ought to be treated as women for their own good and a more welcoming society.

    (side note: if you are in that brainless chunk of progs who do believe there is no difference between the sexes, I highly encourage you to look at the world records in any discipline with easily measured metrics such as 100m dash and freestyle swimming. Not a single male record is under the women’s record, in some cases every historical male record eclipses the current female one. Males and females are different, this should be acknowledged, and it should not be a barrier to equal dignity in treatment.)

    A movement that can’t include anyone but the most in-line and pure of the ideological adepts is doomed to be irrelevant, and on that the progressives have an almost complete lock.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Harsh to hear but I believe this perspective to be both true and very important to accept/understand (with the exception of the terf topic)

      • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Keep in mind I’m not saying to accept TERFs, I’m saying to be smart about letting them cut themselves off instead of forcing them out.

    • iarigby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      wow. most of what you write creates culture that completely excludes and alienates women. See: hostility of current male dominated fields towards women. Blows my mind that you consider going backwards, rather than male culture evolving to be better human beings, to be a solution.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        A competitive spirit is not morally wrong and calling men worse human beings for having one is so fundamentally wrong that I can only ask you to reread and reconsider the above post.

      • spacecadet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s amazing how well he articulated the problem and pointed out potential solutions just for you to give a perfect example of the type of rhetoric he is talking about that drives people away from the left. Like his link, the parody writes itself…

      • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I have a bit of a preconceived notion as to why you are saying this, however I would rather ask you to be more specific before jumping to conclusions. Can you give concrete examples as to how my suggestions would alienate women?

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The same as it always has been. Punk Rock. Conservative shit is so goddamn cringe it’s really hard to imagine how it has convinced anyone that it is any kind of counterculture.

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Easy

    Every time there is a conversation regarding men issues, dismiss them as talking about something that clearly DOESN’T EXISTS, demean them, if they are emotionally intelligent enough to defend themselves from the TOTALLY NOT aggressive rhetoric, compare them to something else, preferably, something weaker and less smart than them, bonus points if you attack their sexuality in the same phrase, that always gets them riled up to support you!

    Even more so if you treat them like complete imbeciles with a memory span of seconds and assume they forgot about all the years you have been doing this exact same thing!

    And whatever you do, don’t forget to bring up how women have and keep having BIGGER issues

    That’ll work wonders

    • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I genuinely believe that more empathy is needed in both directions for people to come out of their trenches. Problem is, it"s hard to feel empathy for those who have no empathy in return. It’s a locked position reinforcing itself with every bad interaction. To break out of this we would have to listen and show that we care, while not getting the same things back. It feels bad. Unfair. Again, this goes both ways.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Do what you say you’re going to do when you get elected. Quit finding just enough no votes and making excuses. You promise, we vote, you don’t deliver. Then you ask “why does no one want to vote for us? We promised to be marginally less terrible than our opponents!”

  • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Look at what men are missing and how the right is selling it to them.

    Men aren’t doing so hot right now, emotionally and mentally. They feel like they are not manly, and criticized for trying to be manly or liking manly things. There’s a lack of transitions into manhood, and the bar that is seen as a successful man with a good career is pretty much impossible.

    If you have a poor paying job, you’re not manly. If you have a well paying job but it’s blue collar you’re not manly because you’re a dumb working stiff. If you have a white collar job you’re not manly because you’re not doing anything tough with your body. Maybe if you’re a CEO who owns the company but also does rock climbing and bear fighting are you seen as manly enough, maybe.

    Then you have these guys, your Andrew Tates and so on, who act very manly and tell you it’s ok to be a man and then spout off some of the most toxic, asinine shit saying that’s how you be a man. And young guys fall for it because they aren’t shown any alternative.

    Then on the left you have people who speak ill of men as a whole, and manliness as a whole. Sometimes the criticisms are correct, but a lot of times it’s presented as men overall. If you try to say that it’s not every man out there who’s a monster, you get blasted with criticism for saying “not all men”. They also don’t provide anything positive or solutions for feeling manly, with the best they can be offered is to be more like women.

    So young men, especially young cishet men, are actively pushed away from leftist spaces, leaving them feeling demonized by those spaces, and actively pandered to by the right which are offering mind poison dressed up as solutions.

    So what do we do? There’s a few things to fix.

    1. leftist media has to stop demonizing men and start demonizing actions. Instead of saying “men are rapists” start saying “rapists are bad”. When people start to say things like “cis people are shit” other people need to call them out of it, because if you’re supposed to be the side that accepts people’s gender identity, it should be for all gender identities. It can feel cathartic to rail against the majority demographic, especially when people of that demographic have hurt you, but if you feel that it’s unfair to rail against a group because of the actions of a few members of it, that should apply to all groups. Things like “what’s wrong with the straights” doesn’t help build bonds with allies, and it turns young men away from leftist spaces.

    2. there needs to be validation and recognition from the left for problems men have, like suicide, workplace death and heavier prison sentencing. The left needs to show that they are trying to fix these problems, too, instead of telling young men to suck it up and be a man about it because they are the oppressor demographic.

    3. there needs to be people who counter toxic masculinity, not with telling men to be more like women, but with positive masculinity. If a man is having emotional or mental problems, toxic masculinity says to push that down. Femininity says it’s ok to be soft and vulnerable. Positive masculinity would say that a real man is true to himself and his feelings and expresses then freely, even if others might ridicule him for it. There’s a subtle difference, and the end result of femininity’s and positive masculinity’s tactic might be the same, i.e. the man expresses those feelings, but the way that they get there is very different. The former makes the man feel less validated in his identity, while the latter uplifts it. The memes where they say stuff like “I always tell my homies I love them before they go to bed” actually work.

    4. leftist influencers need to make fighting for the rights of minorities seem manly. Badass. Like a hero. Worthy of praise and celebration.

    5. while they won’t get the financial and political backing that the toxic male influencers get, there needs to be positive male influencers who talk about masculinity in a positive way, while promoting the ideas above. There needs to be an alternative, who acts manly but in the fun, positive way, that validates young men’s feelings of inadequacy, frustration, and isolation, while promoting an egalitarian perspective.

    6. there needs to be a cultural shift in what makes a man. A shift away from dying in battle or becoming a tycoon, and a resurgence of the working class hero. Mass media itself needs to change and promote positive male figures. It can work and be popular, like in Avatar the Last Airbender. We need to show men that they are still men, and still worthy of love, respect and adoration, even if they aren’t a super soldier or a wealthy elite. A lot of this is counter to capitalistic goals, so it may have to be subversive, but eventually it needs to be made the norm.

    7. other men need to continue to step up and speak out about injustice towards minorities and against toxic masculinity behaviors in the day to day, and start decrying those behaviors as unmanly. People need to call Andrew Tate and the like unmanly.

    8. ideally, the men’s rights movement should be absorbed by the left and the toxic incels kicked out. It should be done in the name of gender equality. Fixing only woman’s problems won’t solve the patriarchy (which could be changed to a different term so everyone feels like it’s less of an us vs them) and feminists should try to help solve men’s problems directly rather than indirectly. Young men would see feminism as more appealing if feminists actually focused on men’s problems as well, rather than ignoring or worse, demonizing them. Feminism could be rebranded as an egalitarian movement for all sexes and genders, maybe get a name change. If the patriarchy affects everyone, then the focus should be on everyone. Maybe it would have to be a whole new movement entirely.

    So it’s a larger problem than just getting more leftist male influencers, and some of those problems are systematic. Some can get worked on today. Talking about masculinity in a positive way, promotive equity, stop both their side and your side from bigotry, and, probably the thing that would get young men on board the most:

    Actually trying to solve the problems young men are going through.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is a great solution but it has two big problems that make it functionally impossible.

      1. To the left there is no non-toxic or positive masculinity.
      2. Feminism doesn’t actually support men, it’s a reluctant talking point. It only helps men if it happens to coincide with benefiting women.
      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Depends on what part of the left you’re talking about, but yeah, these are things which have to change in order for it to work well.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      You hit the nail on the head AND provided clear action items. Excellent post.

      I do think that it would be difficult to rebrand “feminism” and “patriarchy” because the terms are inherently gendered and are sometimes still being used for gendered purposes. We should definitely find new terms and be more accurate about the egalitarian movement being a new movement, or a rebrand of the more general parts of feminism, rather than trying to reuse the old movement’s terms when it doesn’t make sense.

    • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      W-Wait, what is this? A well-thought out, constructive, sympathetic comment? Here? I don’t believe it!

      Real talk, though: This is an incredibly solid post and I really appreciate you taking the time to actually write all of these points out. It’s rare (or, subjectively, it feels rare) to see an admission that a major shift in how this topic is approached is needed, and I feel just a bit more hopeful seeing someone else put in the time to go this deep on it.

      I would only make two add-on comments to your points:

      • With regard to point #6, I agree with the concept - but we have to be careful of how we phrase this. Unless it comes with a major effort to utterly restructure our economy in such a way that either a man’s value is no longer measured in his ability to be successful in a paid position, and/or we restructure our economy to make success more viable, I fear that efforts to support “working class heros” are doomed to become awkward failures as automation continues to steamroll the viability of those positions.

      • One point I don’t see brought up here, though it is touched at in (1) and (8), is that we’ve got to modulate how we discuss so-called “toxic” behavior. When so many seemingly minor behaviors are met with the same levels of disdain, villainization, and even punishment as things like actual sexual assault, it ends up feeling deeply isolating, undermines the point that is trying to be made, and pushes men towards the worst actors.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        For #6, I don’t think we necessarily have to move away from the idea that being a man means being a provider and a protector. At least to me those are some of the core tenants of being a man.

        The person above you mentioned the men in Avatar the last Airbender. But I also want to add in the men in LOTR, Gomez Adams, Ted Lasso, Kratos in the newer god of war games, and Steve Rodgers.

        These are men who are caring, loving, emotional and they are (mostly) able to show those emotions, capable of growth, and able to admit when they are wrong. But they are still men. Men who struggle with anger, men go to war and protect their families, men who are incredibly strong in the face of struggle, men who sometimes make “inappropriate” (to the left) jokes, and men who strive for nothing else but bettering the lives of those in their care.

        I sometimes hate that what counts as “positive masculinity” is really just feminity but dressed up in a blue bow. Men are not women and telling them that they can’t be super competitive, can’t be angry, and can’t fail is just setting them up to fall into toxic masculinity. This might just be me talking about the culture I was raised in but those things aren’t necessarily a bad thing, and erasing what a “man” has been for generations isn’t going to win you any extra fans.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Thanks, I’m glad you liked it!

        I kinda agree on your points. I feel that working class heros could make a comeback if done well, though.

        Hell ideally I’d like to see more historical stuff based on labor history, Blair Mountain was crazy and could totally be an action movie.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      All these things already exist and maybe just need more exposure.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Most things already exist. What we need is for this to become the dominant understanding/goals of the left.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I don’t think that’s inherently true for all feminism, though there’s definitely been some bad actors. Actresses.

      • 0xD@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Wrong. Feminism is anti-patriarchy, for everyone. Educate yourself, read a little.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Being anti-patriarchy is an inherently anti-male stance. A feminist walks up to a man and says “We’re trying to erode your influence on society, isn’t that great?” Yeah, and what the natives need is Christianity.

          They’ll try to lie and market “The Patriarchy” as whatever they think they can get away with at the moment with the audience they’ve cornered, pretend like defeating “The Patriarchy” should be the goal of whoever they’re talking to as well. It shouldn’t.

          Feminism started out as things like the suffragettes, wanting the right to vote in elections. Fair enough. “We want to be equal to men!” Uh huh…so here in 2025 what right or privilege do I enjoy under the law that a woman doesn’t?

          I will also assert this: No feminist will be caught dead genuinely helping a man. A feminist is more likely to burn down a men’s shelter than build one.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Feminism started as a way to fight for the rights of women. That’s not anti-male, but it’s also not “for everyone”.

    • Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I want “manly-ness” to go extinct. Honestly I bet mods might delete my comment. But I feel the issue is we as a species are figuring out (slowly) that we all need to go extinct. Human brain architecture is fatally flawed. Greed and selfish notions, always striving for power, and the destruction of basically all other life in this planet, tells me we all need to simply accept that we are empherial, transient and temporary.

      Nothing is sacred, there is no gods or meaning. Ultimate Nihilism essentially. MISANTHROPIC ANTI-NATALISM. But also negative-utilarianism, which states that those who choose to stay living need to focus on reducing other people’s suffering. Honestly, it’s almost fascist itself, my beliefs. Here’s one: those who cause other people suffering should be executed! No tolerance for intolerance…

      Start by burning all the churches down. Outlaw religion, the mind sickness. Only allow what can be proven scientifically. But yeah, basically we need to genocide the genociders… no forgiveness. Cull the conservatives. No more nations or governments. No patriotism or nationalism or exclusive cultures… above all though, we humans are garbage and we have poisoned the entire planet. We must go extinct. Never get off this planet! Kill any who try to leave, gotta contain the cancer!

      EDIT: to answer the question of what could we do to win over more young men? Tell them and everyone else this, “we are going to Eat the Rich, and fucking slaughter Nazis!”

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Reframe spending as stimulating the economy.

    Create jobs through a green new deal that allows for upeard mobility for the motivated. Small business grants.

    Create tax incentives for, endorse and give loam grants to businesses that provide workers with a share of a company. Whether co-op type thing or convoluted stock share program.

    Young men want to matter, and they want to see the results of their effort.