I am surely not a swimmer, but after the recent tragic flooding in Texas, it got me and my roommate wondering…

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    A life jacket can’t effectively protect you against debris, but it can help keep you from drowning from exhaustion as you try to dodge and seek an escape. And if you do die anyway, it could help your body be found, for the sake of those who mourn you.

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not exactly true, yes if the debris is bad enough and the current is strong enough, there isn’t a lot that will help. BUT if you have a life jacket, even in swiftly moving water, you can lean back and orient your feet downstream and it’ll keep your head away from the worst of it.

      That would be significantly harder to do without a PFD.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Good point. I guess people ought not only to have life jackets, but also trained on how best to use them in rough water. Although they’re mostly kept near boats and things. Would having them hung on the cabin walls at Camp Mystic have saved lives? Not all, with whole buildings crashing around in the water, but maybe a few.

  • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A life jacket is what can help save you once you exhaust yourself fighting against a torrent of water. If you need to do something a bit reckless to save yourself or someone else, then it can help you catch your breath a bit and keep your head above water.

    The thing is, if you are needing to rely on a lifejacket, the situation may already be a bit desperate. If you are able to get some kind of an early warning system, then that will go a lot farther at helping you get to safety. Getting a lifejacket could help make a difference if you are in a potential flood zone.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      A warning like a map of where the most dangerous fast moving flood waters will be? A place where cabins should not be built?

      • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        You would hope that no houses would be built in potential flooding zones, but that involves pesky things like ‘regulations’ or ‘caring about other peoples lives’.

        Tap for spoiler

        (/s)

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The cabins at the camp predated the flood maps, but the owners were explicitly warned and just didn’t want to move them. Nobody made them and now children are dead.

      • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        A map? Hahaha, that’s almost funny!

        Coming from South Mississippi, it’s up to Alabama as to whenever they decide to open their flood gates as to how many feet of water we get in a flood.

        Hurricane Sandy flooded us deeper than Hurricane Katrina. Alabama has proven more than once that they don’t give a shit about us down here.

        Flood zone maps are only useful when those pesky humans don’t intervene and open up flood gates and dams and shit. Oh, and humans literally created those things.

        Nature is no longer strictly in control…

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You want a Type-1, made to keep an unconscious adult on their back with their head out of the water for an extended period of time. I use type 3 when I canoe on the lake. I’m not a whitewater enthusiast. The type 1 are made for offshore shit where the person might be knocked out when they fall off the boat.

    But yeah, in a flash flood it’s only going to keep you on top. Probably get smashed by a tree or a car or something. Best to stay out of floodwater.

    edit: but better a type 3 or even a ring than nothing. If I was in a hurricane or flash flood situation I’d rather have a type 1

  • YaksDC@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Another important design feature is that a properly worn life jacket will keep your face out of the water if you were to lose consciousness while wearing it.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m a reasonably good swimmer, I’ve had plenty of training and experience. And if I was in a flood zone I would definitely want to have a life jacket on. Being a good swimmer is only going to help a little bit in a mess like that.

    Avoid getting into the water in the first place, of course. Flood water sucks. Climb on your roof, climb a tree, ideally evacuate before the water gets there. But if you’re in a situation where you might fall into the flood water anyway, have a life jacket on.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    A life jacket can’t effectively protect you against debris, but it can help keep you from drowning from exhaustion as you try to dodge and seek an escape. And if you do die anyway, it could help your body be found, for the sake of those who mourn you.

    Also: if it’s physically possible for you, please learn to swim.

    • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thank you and everyone else for all the informative comments!

      Back in 2014, I actually did kinda force myself to learn to swim, once, in a deep river with a current. I wasn’t all that great at swimming, but I managed to resurface and start swimming towards the shore before someone else swam out to help me.

      I think I could have managed to swim to shore myself, but at a struggle as it was my first time ever trying to swim. Regardless, at least I have one experience under my belt.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m impressed with your initiative! But maybe practice some more, in a safer place, with someone who can help you become more efficient at staying afloat and moving easily through the water.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        With all the care, I would strongly advise you not to go with “you must be in a survival situation to learn to swim” cliché.

        Not only is it, well, dangerous, but it also doesn’t teach you to swim properly either. If you just try to stay on the surface, you’ll expend a ton of energy and can get water in your throat which will complicate things severely.

        You should learn to stay on the surface by breathing only. Pick a place with still water (lake? calm sea? pool?) and learn to lay down on your spine without movement. Do it near the shore, of course. Just put your body in a star shape, legs and hands extended, and learn to breathe in a way that allows you to float still. Once you learn it, not only you have improved breathing technique helpful in swimming, but you can also take a rest on water anytime to restore without even having a jacket in the first place.

        Then, knowing how to breathe to stay afloat, learn to swim. Now you can save a lot of energy because you don’t need much movement to keep you afloat, and you can just swim in the direction you need

  • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Life jackets will save or can kill in sinking boats or planes. You cannot overcome them if you are trapped inside, floating before exiting.

    I would rather have a diving BCD in most cases where floatation is needed. That enables adjusting floatation regardless of weight. They can be manually inflated in a pinch.

    However, in a flood, the water is not as problematic as the debris carried in the water. You need to get out of the way and stay out of the water at all costs. If you are unable to escape the water front, you are unlikely to have a flotation device handy either.

    If Texas is so incompetent of a government to be unreliable for flood warning. I would be looking at making my own solar powered remote sensor with a node radio network. There are cheap Arduino components to build such a thing for a hundred bucks these days. If government is so inept, making anything that appears official in nature somewhere remote will go unquestioned. You can do anything you want in life if you just wear a plain used white hardhat, a reflective vest, well worn boots, and carry a clipboard.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Remember: government has been made to be inept. It shouldn’t be inept. This is just what happens when people repeatedly vote for people that say government doesn’t work. Well, you guarantee it by voting in people who say such things! Like hiring a hater for a company’s PR team, it’s utterly brainless, and that explains why Texas has done it so much.

  • snoons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    "It’s not that the water is flowing, it’s hwat the water brings with it.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    As I understand it, rapid flood waters will likely crush you to death with debris, or you’ll get stuck underwater. A vest won’t save you from either of those.

    But if you have one, wear it. Swimming ability won’t help you if you’re unconscious or exhausted. Ideally, you stay out of the water, but if you can’t, you’ll be better off with a life jacket on.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I believe in a flood situation what kills you isn’t usually the drowning part. It’s the being crushed by debris.

    • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      After riding out Katrina for two weeks flooded in, I found myself wondering where all the gators were, and very thankful that nobody was attacked by one (to my knowledge, at least in my area)…

      Cuz we’re definitely in a gator area…

      • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Never been there before. But there are videos of Fukushima debris floes. Looks like a nightmare, regardless of your swimming level.

        • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          During Katrina flooding, if you didn’t have a boat or a tractor, you’d have to walk like 2 miles through flood water, in the swamps, to even get to a store.

          Hell, people were even bathing in the flood waters!

          It was only after the flood mostly subsided, that I found myself wondering, how lucky everyone was to not be attacked by gators!

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Life jackets also get caught on things. So if it’s wide open and free from anything to snag on, great, enjoy the terrifying not-lazy river ride. If there are things to snag on, like I assume the Texas flash floods, then a lifejacket would also be a liability.

    I’ve done some downriver rapids canoe/kayak stuff, by no means an expert nor even knowledgeable hobbyist. On a certain river trip, fast-flowing with lots of submerged trees, they had us drill unclipping jackets and wriggling out of them while submerged.

    • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      If the water conditions are so bad you would consider a life jacket a liability, you’re just fucked. The debris your jacket could get caught on is the stuff that’ll knock you insensate, and then you drown

      • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If you’re whitewater kayaking, it’s not uncommon to have a knife accessible from your PFD.

        It can be used to cut any ropes you might be tangled in or (worse case) cut the PFD.

        In general, having a knife with you is useful in most emergency situations (and a throw rope, pin kit, plus knowledge of how to use them).

        edit: Oops, this was supposed to be a response for the parent thread.