• brezel@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        98
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        15 days ago
        • some people run more than 1 OS
        • some people actually program and need to load unsigned shit all the time
        • some people have legacy hardware that doesn’t run with secureboot
        • it is my decision and my decision alone how i boot my operating systems. not EA’s.
        • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          15 days ago

          Im fairly certain any legacy hardware that doesn’t have secure boot as an option is going to struggle loading BF6 regardless.

          The first two points are not related to secure boot at all.

          • brezel@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            15 days ago

            you think loading my own kernel modules is not related to secure boot? i guess you don’t work in IT then.

            • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              It doesn’t matter which kernel modules are used, as long as you have signed those changes before rebooting.

              • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 days ago

                Do you have any advice for someone that dual boots SteamOS and Windows 10 on a Steam Deck?

                I’ve heard online that since SteamOS manually signs keys or something, that if any changes happen to the kernel that later need to be updated by SteamOS, I’d need to re-sign the keys or whatever. Idk I’m not well versed in any of this

                I’ve heard it’s as easy as downloading the M$ keys to enable Secure Boot, but I also don’t want to brick my Deck.

                • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  Windows 10 support is ending soon so there’s no reason to have it on your steam deck. Steam will stop supporting it sooner after Microsoft does, just like steam does with Apples operating system.

            • troed@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              Really? Which would those be? So far I haven’t come upon one.

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          31
          ·
          15 days ago
          1. You can run more than one OS with secure boot enabled. It’s just a pain in the ass.
          2. you can run unsigned code on a secure boot enabled system.
          3. its 2025, what the fuck do you have that can’t secure boot by now?
          4. THIS is your winning argument.
          • Alaik@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            15 days ago

            I don’t think he needs a winning argument. I think EA needs to justify this kernel level AC, not the other way around.

          • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            You can run more than one OS with secure boot enabled. It’s just a pain in the ass.

            Weird, for me it was just flicking the switch in UEFI and now Grub and through it Windows 10 and Fedora 43 boot in Secure Boot.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        15 days ago

        Needlessly intrusive. Can obviously be circumvented by cheaters anyway, so quite possibly superfluous. Apart from that it protects against the kinds of attacks that typically require physical access to the computer. If you have physical access you have full access anyway. Etc.

        • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 days ago

          If you have physical access you have full access anyway. Etc.

          You know secure boot was specifically made to protect users for this exact use case. Any tampering of the system will prevent the system from booting.

          • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            15 days ago

            I get your pc, “tamper” it, then i install a fake bios that tells you all is well and that your tpm and secureboot and whatever else bullcrap they invent is still happy.

            See the problem?

            • Corngood@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              15 days ago

              It won’t boot though, because the keys to decrypt the system are stored in the TPM.

              Sure you could replace the whole OS, but that’s going to be very obvious and won’t allow you access to the data.

                • PHLAK@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  If you enable Secure Boot you should also set a BIOS password for this very reason.

                  • Saleh@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    15 days ago

                    So, if you set a bios password either way, which benefit does secureboot give?

              • atticus88th@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 days ago

                Isnt it possible to have a recovery key? Isnt that technically a backdoor? Maybe the terms are not correct but there is a way in physically.

          • Limonene@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            A person with physical access can tamper with the OS, then tamper with the signing keys. Most secure boot systems allow you to install keys.

            Secure boot can’t detect a USB keylogger. Nothing can.

            • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              The signature checks will immediately fail if ANY tampering has occurred.

              Adding a USB keylogger that has not been signed will cause a signature verification failure during boot.

              • Limonene@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 days ago

                A USB keylogger is not detectable by the computer, not in firmware nor operating system. It passively sniffs the traffic between the USB keyboard and the computer, to be dumped out later.

                • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  If your keys are stored in the TPM for use during the secure boot phase, there will be nothing for it to log.

        • Tanoh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          If you have physical access you have full access anyway

          No, encrypt your drives.