• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    What is it with Americans and this fear of socialism? Yes let’s have some socialism, what the hell is the problem with that?

    • sturger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The elites own the media. We’re conditioned from birth to hate SoCiAlIsm/CoMmUnIsm/TaXes/ThEft/Etc. Repeat those terms 100 times a day over a lifespan and it becomes religion for 30% of the population.

      If the government spends money on the little people, there’s less money to bail out the Too Big to Fails.

      Privatize the gains, socialize the losses. The United States isn’t a country, it’s a corporation with a military.

    • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      It depends on how the socialism is used. US corporations, farmers and the fucking MAGAts that abused Payback Protection Program like it a lot.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Socialism is democratic control of the factors of production. Crony capitalists paying each other isn’t socialism.

        • silasmariner@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Umm. Ok. Normally when ppl talk about socialisism they’re usually more talking about state provision of the means to live for those who would otherwise be unprovided for; ownership and control of means of production is generally more associated w/ the word communism. Obvs both big tents, but still, odd defn IMO

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Supporting the food supply and keeping jobs during COVID are both great examples where the government should step in. The problem is the hypocrisy, when people agree only when it benefits them, only when they can be “takers”.

        Even the lack of safety features on the Payback Protection Program were good things - the money got out where it was needed much quicker.

        The emergency is past so now we have the opportunity to go back and look for fraudulent use. We have time for the legal system to work. This is the money we need to “claw back”. This is the fraud we need to hunt down. And it’s not enough to just return the money for a free five year loan

        • jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          fuck that, the government already requires taxes without consent. It should not be allowed to retroactively declare uses of money fraudulent.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            As far as I remember a key feature of that program was to say what is was for but then to intentionally not implement bureaucracy to ensure that. If it was always fraud but getting the money out fast was a priority, then yes it’s very much a good thing to go back and rain justice down on cheaters

          • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Did the government just make it rain money on people unprompted or did people fill in forms saying they needed it?

    • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Probably stems from the Red Scare when people were rounded up and jailed/fired/blacklisted/exiled. It became the boogeyman. Through the last couple generations the fear around the word is still there, mostly because we haven’t heard positive things (let alone the truth) about socialist policies in the better part of a century.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Americans see China and think: “Oh no, very bad because of socialism/communism

      But as someone who was born in mainland China (I’m Chinese-American), PRC is nothing “socialist”/“communist” at all, its a horrible State-Capitalist Authroitarian Regime under the guise of Communist aesthetics. I don’t fear socialism/communism because they never truely existed, in fact, I’d say that Norway or Finland (based on what info I could gather anyways, never personally been to Norway or Finland so I can’t speak from experience) would be more closer to “socialism” than PRC, at least they actually have a social safety net, PRC doesn’t.

      As for why Americans fear these terms, I think it’s because, for some people anyways, you can get labeled as an enemy of the state to even uttering “socialism”/“communism”.

      (Legal disclaimer to the FBI Agent reading this, just in case I have to make this clear: No, I am not a “communist”, as in, I do not support the CCP or similar authoritarian parties, I just support a more egalitarain and democratic society however you want to call that, and my views are 100% compatible with the US Constitution, now fuck off FBI, stop trying to denaturalize me, maybe actualy investigate the traitor in the white house, for fuck sake)

    • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 days ago

      McCarthyism is probably the most succinct answer. The Cold War directly aligned us against the Soviet Union, and a key means of villainizing the USSR and its citizenry was to paint their core governing beliefs as heretical to the American way.

      There is also no doubt in my mind that Socialism’s strong connection to Union activity in the US also incentivized Corporate Barons to lobby against Social Politics hard. I have not seen any specifics about that myself, though. Modern lobbying efforts are well-known, though.