I feel like maybe around 2012 the whole concept of eras died.

Like I can clearly visualize items/people/media from the 60s/70s/80s/90s/00’s, but everything is homogenized now and there’s really no “style of the time” either. I think everything from 2013+ will just be remembered as a malaise era, if anything. Maybe the style of the 2050’s will be post cyberpunk apocalyptic? I have no idea.

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      I dunno. The 80s had a very particular vibe. When the 90s came along, it just felt different, even as I lived through it.

      I think the 2000’s didn’t feel that much different than that 2010’s.

      But yeah maybe it’s recency bias.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I wasn’t replying to OP though. I was replying to someone saying that living through an era makes it harder to discern the changes. I didn’t really agree with that because the 90s felt different from the 80s, even as I lived through them.

            • khannie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Yes, but I felt I was living through a different era. My point was that recently it hasn’t felt that way. Maybe not in 20 years.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    No, not at all. It’s just easier to draw lines on where things start and stop once they change, so you may not feel like you’re “in” an era.

  • theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    No, you’re just used to things that are going on now so you don’t see how it’ll look in 20 years. I remember seeing people saying similar things back in, like, 2009

  • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Nope, you just can’t put your finger on what’s distinct now and you lack the contrast of what the future brings.

    Hair styles, fashion, design, colors, music, phones and other devices, all of that will be different in 10 years.

    Remember, facebook was all the rage in a different era and is now uncool. Same for twitter. That’s era defining as well.

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      No.

      You say the Facebook Ear has past, but there are still literally billions of people logging in everyday.

      Your small set of friends might have passed on Facebook, but it hasn’t gone away.

      Moreover, when I say “hippie era” you think of certain clothes, certain music, etc etc.

      There’s no one style that defines the ‘Facebook Era.’

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve been thinking about exactly this lately, and I’m open to the possibility that I’m just getting old and just falling into the “everything new is all the same crap!”

    But… Imagine what you would wear to a 70s themed party, how about 80s, 90s?

    I’m confident three distinct styles popped in your head.

    But what about a 2010s party? Sure, some trends come and go, but I don’t feel like the 10s party would look much different from a 2020 or 2000s party.

    Feel free to tell me if I’m just old.

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      2000s was very emo-/scene-heavy. Lots of bracelets and mixing of black and neon.

      2010s are the best argument for you, probably. It was more of a blend of things 🤷‍♂️ hipsters and preppy looks got pretty big, but nowhere near as homogenous

      2020s will be COVID themed with broccoli hair

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Im not even that old. And I still recognized it like you did.

      A huge part of it is likely just tech. Tech plateaud around 2010 ish, 99% of things a normal person does with computers could be done fine on a 2010 computer (if sites weren’t total bogged java slop now which is just dev laziness but anyway)

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Nothing ever unfolded neatly by the decade, but a themepark version could be compiled after the fact. It’s harder when you can’t even talk about “the 00s” gracefully, though. How do you say that?

    I’m pretty sure this is a Randall Monroe observation that I’m just repeating. Relevant XKCD, from 2017.

  • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s the death of the macro culture. All the styles from all the previous eras now coexist and are very much in depending on what sub culture you belong too. Like if you are the edgy kind of teen right now you are wearing y2k style clothing, but if you are more of a normie you wear more classic street wear. If you’re a fashion forward guy in his late 20’s or early 30’s, 40’s to 60’s inspired menswear is the thing to wear. And so on.

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I agree. The 1970s were disco, the 1980s were punk, the 1990s was New Wave, and the 2000’s was the 2000’s.

    I’m old enough to remember Spice Girl mania.

    People who never brought a record knew all the songs, because they were played on the radio, and every store and restaurant played local stations. They were in the newspapers and in magazines. They were mentioned on the local news shows.

    I’ve never heard a Taylor Swift song played in public. All the stores and restaurants that have radio play dedicated oldies stations. No new music at all. I haven’t watched the local news in years, and newspapers and magazines are gone.

    I think you’re going to see smaller and smaller groups getting excited by niche interests. You’re not going to see Beatlemania ever again.