19 states have “no more changing the clocks” laws passed, but aren’t allowed to do so without approval of the federal government?

It’s pretty obvious you can just do what you want these days, consequences are trivial to non-existent, so why don’t we just not change our clocks? (or change them and not change them back, whatever floats your boat)

  • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    From the same article:

    In the United States, several states have enacted legislation to implement permanent DST, but the bills would require Congress to change federal law in order to take effect. The Uniform Time Act of 1966 permits states to opt out of DST and observe permanent standard time, but it does not permit permanent DST.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      So what? Not changing clocks is the bigger issue, and I’m someone that very much prefers DST through the winter, as it gives me more sunlight after the typical work day.

      But I’d settle for a single, non-switching time.

      Plus I’m sure if a state decided to go permanent DST, the Fed would have a hard time forcing the issue, as suddenly the Interstate clause would get challenged in the Supreme Court, and the Fed wants to avoid that at all costs.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The rub is which to go with. Some people want the extra hour of daylight after work in the winter. Others want it in the summer because it will maximize their after-hours sunlight in the season when being outside is more realistic.

        The reasonable position I take is that, if you inflict a Spring Forward on me, I’m owed a goddamned Fall Back and I’ll go to war with any government who tries to keep that hour indefinitely.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          The rub is which to go with. Some people want the extra hour of daylight after work in the winter. Others want it in the summer because it will maximize their after-hours sunlight in the season when being outside is more realistic.

          We already tried permanent DST and it didn’t even last through the first full calendar year before being revoked. And while sticking with one time year-round instead of switching, Standard time is healthier than DST:

          The researchers of a study published in September in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences estimate that permanent standard time would prevent about 300,000 cases of stroke per year and result in 2.6 million fewer people having obesity, while permanent daylight saving time would achieve about two-thirds of the same effect.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          My proposal is to just make them all “fall backs”.

          Yeah, AM/PM will get inverted after a few years, but imho, that’s a small price to pay in exchange for an extra hour of sleep twice a year

        • YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Don’t worry, you’ll get your fall back as regularly scheduled. However, when the clock hits midnight we’re immediately jumping ahead an hour again so we permanently land on DST.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’m just saying that I’m heavily armed even for a Texan. Do with that information what you will.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        This is the solution I mention every year, but so far no one has listened. :) It would solve all the complaints from both sides of which one to choose.

          • leadore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I dunno, the two of you here are the first ones I’ve seen that have also suggested or like the idea, most people just laugh like it’s a joke.

            Maybe try to make a short viral video about the idea to build support?

            1. solves all the complaints I’ve heard about which end of the day the daylight is shifted to, because it meets in the middle like you say.

            2. There are other countries offset by a half hour so it’s not unreasonable in that regard.

            3. It won’t be as hard to adjust to as a full hour and only has to be done one final time.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      It should be implemented by having the state move time zones and reject DST, but no one wants to frame it like that.