Watch the clip. Police comes right up to her and arrests her on camera.
Thankfully it seems like no one said this yet, so just inb4:
She was not stupid, nor useless or played into their hand. Be inspired and take example. Being arrested for a little bit is not that big of a price to pay for resisting tyranny.
More importantly, without blindly believing it will automatically come true, at least put the scenario where you win into your heads. Going to prison for what’s right can actually be liberating, if you think about it. And people can be taken out of prison too, together with all those that were imprisoned for getting or giving an abortion, those that immigrated “illegally” but spent decades contributing to the US’s society and economy, those that only had a bunch of weed on them, etc. Maybe even the whole “for-profit prison” concept may finally come to an end. Imagine that!
USA is cooked, man. It’s no longer a free country. Party of no censorship and free speech, yeah right.
If you aren’t a rich white man it was never free. Most of us are just more adjacent to poverty(increase cost of food and housing) and injustice(ice raids in the suburbs) because we’re in an economic valley. IMO If/ win the employment number recover the median voter will forget all about this
Meh. This was the local police. They wanted the group off the road, and the group wouldn’t move. I don’t really have a problem with this. These protests that block traffic and stuff hurt the wrong people. The guy or girl driving wherever shouldn’t be the target. Try disrupting actual commerce or production if you want to get the attention of the people in power.
A protest with no inconvenience is a parade, not a protest.
Yes, but who you inconvenience matters. Do it to the right people.
Try disrupting actual commerce or production if you want to get the attention of the people in power.
Economies utilize roads. Average Joe driving to work is engaging in commerce and/or production.
And the boss will take it out of average Joe’s payif he is hourly. If he is salary he will have to make up the lost time. The company will feel no pain at all.
It appeared to me that she was on the sidewalk?? How you gonna say she was blocking the road when she’s on the sidewalk? Isn’t that where people are supposed to be?
What it said was that she was leading the protest, and both her and others had refused to leave the road when ordered. Likely this was by one or two cops. When they had to call more out, they arrested the people who had refused the order. At that point she was on the sidewalk, but they knew who she was.
I remember watching a video like this but it was on Reddit and it was top post. It was also happening in Moscow, not the USA.
“The country of freedom” accuses the other country of their censorship in media, but then it starts doing the same things.
Freedom my ass I say
Land of the free1, home of the brave
- Terms and conditions apply
Land of the free
Whoever told you that is your enemy
That whole ass record goes exactly as hard today as it did on release.
(Rage Against the Machine’s self-titled debut, shit rips)
*Land of the Thief, home of the Slave
–Brother Ali
Yep, that came to mind, but I wanted to keep the original phrasing.
I think “brave” also needs a footnote.
Yeah, probably something along the lines of “only if you agree with someone’s ideology”; the same “Terms and conditions apply” also works.
For the lazy ones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNxc8YKHlpw
Thank you
If this had happened in Venezuela in last couple of days the media would be loosing it’s shit. The image of that arrest would be immortalized and treated like the Saigon pistol execution.
Immediately following the attack, bombing and kidnapping of Maduro, journalists were rounded up around the country.
Our media isn’t making a stink about it because they are complicit in the manufacturing of a narrative here and you can’t have people in Venezuela contradicting that narrative.
“Arrested for obstructing a roadway”
Sees that it is plainly a sidewalk
“Failure to obey a lawful command”
Sees her completely cooperative
Everyone knows the crime is Criticizing Dear Leader, but they don’t have the laws in place for that yet so they’re improvising.
“You got an uphill battle here, counselor. She did look at him crossways.”
Meanwhile, dumbass Trump in the corner, seething and drooling with rage. “I didn’t get muh peace prize…” and other mumblings that have nothing to do with the case.
The protest she was being interviewed about had previously been marching through the street…
Her actual ‘crime’ was organizing the protest.
The protest which was, as far as I can tell, entirely peaceful.
So… yeah.
That’s effectively a crime now.
… do people see why some of us have been calling for more uh, … effective means of resistance, for some time now?
They can and will ‘just arrest everyone’.
They’ll bankrupt the country doing it.
“I don’t think it’s a coincidence that as soon as I finished an interview speaking on Venezuela, I was arrested – the only person arrested out of 200 people,” she told the outlet.
Imagine that. 200 protesters, but she was the only one obstructing a roadway. That must have been crazy. 199 protesters safely protesting and this one crazy lady out in the road. /s
Should make the defence easy though.
Hopefully she can counter sue for first amendment violations.
If you read the article, the violation occurred earlier. They just identified her and arrested her then.
It’s all bullshit obviously, but I doubt the case will be cut and dry if they decide to pursue.
They probably have video footage or her uncovered face in the roadway after being instructed to move. Or she may have been doing something to stand out, from others, like yelling, getting close to officers, or organizing.
Even when protesting against a better government, remember to cover your face, especially if you plan to defy officer orders or do something more… extreme.
I got the impression she was a leader. It they will arrest you for being in the road, mask up!
The article implies the officers identified her from blocking the roadway prior to the interview along with all the other protesters.
The interview happened after.
But kinda telling of the 200 people they only identified and arrested her.
Note that they apparently didn’t arrest her when they saw her doing it.
They waited until when she was in front of a news cameras again because they wanted to make an example out of her.
Welcome to Trump’s Amerikkka
Reporting Team Watches Women Kidnapped In Broad Daylight, Openly Wonders why Nobody Trusts Journalists
This is a really stupid take. The reporters had nothing to do with the arrest.
They stopped her there (obstruction of the road, the given reason). They were the reason her voice was heard in that second and not later, and lead to the arrest (the real reason).
deleted by creator
I don’t understand. ELI5?
He suggests the journalists should protect the girl from the police, get shot and die in order for him to trust journalists.
Yes, this is my stance. Anyone who would watch this happen and not intervene is a coward. If anyone reading this is tempted to interpret these words as sarcasm, you are misinterpreting me.
edit* The number of cowards downvoting this post is why I don’t expect to survive this regime. Piss off.
Bad take.
If the journalists had intervened, the cops would have just arrested them and confiscated/deleted the interview.
You wrote horribly stupid wrong
A little sus that the reporter and camera operator weren’t arrested for “blocking a road” even though they were standing in the same place.
She was arrested for blocking roadways earlier during a march she organized.
Flashback to people getting arrested in the red square for holding a white piece of paper
Hi, mod here.
In the future, please avoid sharing links from news aggregators. Sharing from the original source helps community health by providing transparency, and allows others to avoid reposting the same article.
Thanks for saying that. Yahoo tries to set millions of data harvesting cookies, it’s insane. Declining it means no video in this case.
This is the beauty of private tabs, they can set as many data harvesting cookies as they like, and the cookies are deleted when I close the window
Press X to doubt.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/private-browsing-use-firefox-without-history
Private Browsing does not save your browsing information, such as history and cookies
There’s a lot of things private browsing does not do (partly because there’s a lot more parts of the stack involved in privacy than just your web browser) but deleting cookies on exit is literally one of the things private browsing specifically does and is directly controlled by the browser
Land of the Free
Bill Hicks had a joke that ended with, “You are free to do as we tell you.”
And now he’s dead.
To quote Tool’s liner notes from the Ænima album in reference to Hicks, “Another dead hero”
My favorite album/song from my favorite band! 😍
I’ll drink to that
What? The land of the free?
Whoever told you that is your enemy!
Terms and conditions apply.
deleted by creator
What a shithole country.
🎵 In the laaaand of the unfree… And the home of the depraved.🎵
Land of the fee, and the home of the slave.
🎶Ain’t that America? Home of the fee, baby! 🎶
Good American slaves make a little noise, get gassed and go home. Good for nothing.
You’re just a flight away! Come and save us! Show us how good for something you are.
You have a second amendment right, use it to empower yourself. I have my own backyard and currently it’s not being fucked with.
You have the right to self-autonomy, use it to save the world.
Or will you just watch Hitler? You’d rather watch Hitler than take one flight and save Earth?
Garth Ennis and Steve Dillon summed it up so well in Preacher
Fuck you Yahoo
I’m not selling you my soul for a video.
Fuck every US tech company while you’re at it
Once this is over, and one day it will, we can’t forget this, we can’t forget what IS tech companies did under trump
Which, I’m sure, means that people will forget in about 5 minutes and then they return to the cool US napy tech
Hmmm, I wonder who gives the tech company low-interest loans and much more? This tech bubble would not be possible without the support of international banking. Too big to fail, and so on.
Don’t stop at tech or the USA, that won’t accomplish anything. International banking cartel will buy the drop at bargain prices, AND give loans for the rebuild. I wonder who controls USA money? Oh, the FED. I wonder who these guys in the FED are? Oh look, those same banks.
They are not even hiding it
Reform or revolution.
-Rosa Luxemburg
No need to wait, we can start right now.
One thing we can all do is switch from Microsoft Office (if you or someone you know is using that) to Libreoffice. Especially important that everyone cancels their Office 365 subscriptions. I singled this out because this is likely the way most people are directly funding big tech. Office 365 funds OpenAI which donated $25 million to Trump.
Also of course cancel your Copilot and ChatGPT subscriptions too.
In addition Reddit users should switch to Lemmy or Piefed.
You can try this
Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNxc8YKHlpw
Nazis like to make examples of people
Getting REAL close to my home fascist pig fucks. I am very please that my State is both concealed and open carry. This shit WILL NOT STOP until they start getting pushed back, HARD. I have been hearing chatter in the streets in regards to ‘while you are in the streets kidnapping us, who is watching your house’?
