• pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I’m actually not sure I can afford to keep playing “buy an indie game every time Ubisoft does something evil or stupid”.

    But I’m down for a few more rounds, at least.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So Ubisoft dumped their entire C suite, starting with their CEO? Well I can only applaud that, that a CEO, known for not giving a shit about gamers, finally decided that he was wrong and decided to do the right thing! Kudos!

    The only way he could have done it better was to take the samurai way out, but yeah, that won’t happen…

    /S needed?

  • demonsword@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The publisher is restructuring around five ‘creative houses’ by implementing cost-cutting, project cancellations, and a return-to-office mandate.

    “We’ll become gamer-centric by fucking our employees even more”

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      16 hours ago

      implementing cost-cutting, project cancellations, and a return-to-office mandate.

      Yes, as a gamer, I cannot count the number of times I’ve thrown the controller down and screamed “WHY WON’T THESE EMPLOYEES RETURN TO THE OFFICE?!”

  • LostWanderer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    LMAO The only way they could truly be gamer friendly is jettisoning the inept CEO and Executives, hiring individuals to fill positions of power that ACTUALLY understand what gamers want. One of the core problems that Ubisoft has is they are so out of touch with what gamers want and need from their games! All this restructuring, RTO mandates, and other cost cutting strategies is just going to fuck them up even more. The good news is, we might get more talented former Ubisoft devs making amazing games and Ubisoft itself ceases to exist as a company.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    1 day ago

    ChatGPT, generate for me a press release that will excuse the firing of another 10,000 employees.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I love it even more when they force their employees to return to office work, nothing makes me happier as a gamer than knowing the people making the games I love are miserable and the company has a much narrower hiring pool.

  • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah that company is cooked. They likely won’t last another decade and are going to make moves to look enticing for a buyout and pad the CEOs golden parachute. Fuck them and their millionaire management who are disconnected from reality and destroyed the careers of many creative people they fired under their feet.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I guarantee private equity is circling them like a flock of buzzards smelling death. This is why they’re preemptively making the same actions that a private equity company would do after acquisition, layoffs, restructuring “bold new plans” and a bunch of lip-service to inflate value before divvying up any resources of value like licenses and senior programmers to form a new brand, and throwing the rest away.

      • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m actually cool with this. They really have been ignoring a large swath of Tom Clancy shit, and I feel assassin’s Creed just isn’t as cool and interesting as it used to be. Not to mention Prince of Persia which they seem to have completely abandoned. I would love it if private equity came in and sold all their ips to other houses.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This would collapse the company instantly. They need to make sure a good followup is available. Because most are not and are even worse, either through greed or incompetence. And yes, it could be way worse than current leaders. Because if it was that easy to just fire them and replace them randomly with anyone and hope it does better, I am sure every company did that.

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        You must be new to capitalism.

        CEOs are extremely replacable. The one thing that differentiates a good CEO from a bad one is how much they STFU and let the actual workers do their job instead of shoving directives down everyones’ throat every time a shiny new waste of an ‘investment’ catches their eye like AI.

        • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Not all CEOs are equally good or bad. Some help the company to be better, others are better at ruining it. Replaceable does not mean that ANYONE can do the job. You completely ignored my point.

          • MotoAsh@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            So you’re saying Ubisoft execs aren’t inept morons seeking the latest money-grubbing trends?

            I hate to break it to you, but yes: Anyone can replace that kind of executive.

            Could a random Joe replace the “executive” in a five man team? Probably not. Though any other scenario, it becomes more and more plausible. The bigger a company gets, the less competent the suits are. It’s basically a law of capitalism these days.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    23 hours ago

    video game company wants to become more gamer friendly

    Wait what? Isn’t being gamer centric what making video games is about?

    • cybervseas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Nope. Konami became gambler centric with pachinko and if I remember correctly Ubisoft previously announced they were going all in on Blockchain.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    24 hours ago

    They are chopping the development teams and titles up into convenient bite-sized chunks. Ubisoft will hang onto the large titles in the Vantage Studios vertical, and the rest will be spun off or sold off. Any spun off studios will be saddled with crippling debt.