Poor Lonnie. May he cry himself to sleep on his MyPillow tonight.

    • druidjaidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I mean it isn’t? It spiked up in September and is flat since and is down like 15% since the beginning of the year. Could it/should it be lower? Perhaps, but it’s not skyrocketing.

      • suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        13 hours ago

        If you ignore the election bump in Nov 2024 that had completely reset by Mar 2025, their stock is up 100% in a little over a year. Yes that counts as skyrocketing, considering sales and profit have plummeted over the same time frame.

  • dxgsthrr@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    20 hours ago

    $TSLA fanbois always claim that only Tesla can sell EVs at a profit / with a huge margin (something like $10k per vehicle). Would be interested to see what kind of margin per vehicle they are making now that the tax credits are removed and it appears that much of the profit came from energy storage.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The big change is Chinese EVs coming into Canada. Tesla sales tanked after Heil Hitler but it’s only a matter of time before they enter the US. Tesla only made money for years selling carbon credits.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Tesla’s board:

    hey, I know, let’s give the ketamine enthusiast who sieg heil’d a dementia-ridden psychopathic racist twice on national television a trillion dollars this year as a comp package.

  • hector@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    And let me guess, stonk went up still?

    It’s not about the companies, it’s a gamble stock, divorced from the performance of the company.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, because while they had lower profits than previously, they still had higher profits than expected. This market behavior is in no way unique or limited to Tesla or “meme stocks”. If a company increases profits, but less than expected, their stock usually drop despite increased profit. It’s because value is tied to actual results vs. expected results on the short term.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Because the stock market doesn’t care about reality. It is just a bunch of rich guys trading money between each other, and they have enough to not need us.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Top 10% of people own 90% of stocks 85% of all businesses, and half the real estate.

          Yeah, it just became another form of currency to them to make number go up attached to their soul of course.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yes, but even then you’d expect the faltering to be reflected, just earlier. As the analysts estimate low profits you’d expect the stock to suffer a sharp decline then.

        Given how overvalued Tesla is arguably in general and that the rationalization is that while it’s not the biggest and best brand now, but their growth trajectory should carry them past all the other automakers, it’s insane that they are only down 11% from their late december highs, and still showing a $1.4 trillion market cap…

        It’s not a company that looks like growth nor do their current results look to justify that crazy valuation. They are valued at 3x Ford, GM, Toyota, and Honda combined, despite having more modest business results than any of them.

        Yes, this local move upward on beating estimates despite a bad result is normal, but the broader trend of this stock is still anything but.

        They squandered their reputation to gain political clout that seems to have evaporated and are locked into EVs in a market where that’s no longer subsidized and a great deal of EV interest is muted now and other manufacturers are able to push out compelling EV cars. You know that Musk is going to take your money and spend it how he sees fit including obscene bonuses to himself…

        I just don’t understand Tesla investors at all at this point…

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Sales are down worldwide, and it’s so bad that he just announced he’s ending production on two of his product lines, the S and X series, abandoning his “SEXY” branding strategy. Now it will just be “EY.”

        The stock is only staying afloat because it’s in the portfolios of so many institutional investment accounts. With each dropping earning report, the stock is going to slowly slide, and eventually those institutional investment accounts will start dropping it. Then he’s finished.

        Tesla will be bankrupt in two years.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            I’ve been reading that the last 5 years.

            And it’s finally starting to happen. They’ve never had a 46% reduction in profit before. They’ve never closed two production lines before.

            This is NOT business as usual over at Tesla. I guarantee The Goblin is in a near panic right now, his Trillion dollar payday is in jeopardy.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              21 hours ago

              And it’s finally starting to happen. They’ve never had a 46% reduction in profit before. They’ve never closed two production lines before.

              oh no! but now they have a robot that everyone will buy 4X! Same shit, different sandwich.

              • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                20 hours ago

                Nobody is going to buy his dumb robot that won’t work. Leastways, not in numbers that would make up for automobile numbers. Otherwise, Ford and Chevy would be building robots.

                Are they building robots?

                They are not.

                • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  Nobody is going to buy his dumb robot that won’t work.

                  and nobody is buying his shit cars, trucks or semis, or solar roofs, or tunnels, or hyperloop…what is your point?

                  TSLA does not need to make money, it just needs the promise of making money one day.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    22 hours ago

    As well it should have. You can’t sell many vehicles to people who still remember what nazi’s were. Yet who really cares. In the aftermath of the nazi shit and dropped sales his board cronies paid him a trillion dollar bonus! CEO bonuses work both ways I guess, in this corrupt, fuck you, world.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      He did not get $1T. The milestones he has to reach to see that number have already failed.

      Tesla Motors is a fail, now Tesla robots are going to make a profit even though they have never revealed a working prototype?

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I honestly don’t know how Musks companies work.

    Tesla makes cars. Cars don’t sell, so profit drops. Musk uses SpaceX to buy Teslas. Tesla’s profit declines, Musk says it’s an AI company, then buys AI from his other AI company, which he funded from Tesla stock. Musk buys Twitter, twitter goes down in value. Musk buys Twitter from himself using xAI, for higher than its market value, then boasts stock gains?

    So now Tesla is going to buy AI from himself, and build robots that were just pantomimed guys in suits… and somehow… profit???

    I don’t know what the fuck is going on in this world. But I would absolutely love to see Tesla’s stock drop and all of this made up debt-financing fall apart like the house of cards it is. However, Musk saying “we’re making robots now” seems to have nicely papered over what should be a massive stock decline. After his last one “Tesla isn’t a car company, it’s an AI company” now it’s “Tesla isn’t an AI company, it’s a factory company”.

    • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s simple in its principal, really…

      • you have multiple companies
      • one company (A) have some supply for some product
      • on the other company (B), you create demand for that product (i.e. for its operation)
      • thus, under your control, you make company A and B enter a trade agreement
      • as someone who brokered that deal, you get rewarded (e.g. from brokerage fee, or commision)
      • sometimes, by having a massive increase in sales, the stock for company A would increase, thus you can sell a little bit of it, which you can later buy back after the stock price goes back down
      • profit

      Some facts:

      • even though they’re your companies, you are a separate entity from them, and they are each its own entity
      • the money comes from the investors as well as profit, remember that they are separate
      • no, you cannot just take all the companies’ money, since even though they’re yours, there are corporate structures and other people at stake preventing that

      So you basically come up with some excuse for moving stuff around, then you come up with some excuse to siphon off some of that good stuff.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          The reason why that was done was largely to keep debtors and investors from ripping apart a company and then transferring the debt to the ones running it. This would’ve been back when most large companies were trade companies wherein it made a lot of sense, since if the ship goes down you’re fucked regardless time to liquidate the company and payback who you can.

          The actual problem is the stock market since it creates fairy tale bullshit that allows Tesla to exist. Remove the stock market and the individual investments become a lot more risky and make bullshit stocks less likely to exist since all stock would be privately traded and their worth based off of company payout.

          • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            keep debtors and investors from ripping apart a company and then transferring the debt to the ones running it

            So instead we get “vulture capitalism” as an entire ecosystem of companies, doing this but with more diffuse consequences, by spreading out the bag holders far and wide (but always among the powerless). Fits like a glove with the general “privatize profits, socialize losses” strategy of wealth extraction we like so much.

            Corporate person-hood is a stain on humanity and the world. We should never have shifted culpability and direct experience of negative consequences away from human beings, ever.

          • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            If a real person would be held resonsible… Not even in finance but in breaking the law stuff. Companies only ever get a fine.

        • matlag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          As much as I despise her (as much as the rest of that tech-bros lot), I still suspect she’s only seen jail because she was a young woman.

  • JackDark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    1 day ago

    Investors largely expected the decline in sales in Tesla’s fourth quarter and full-year results for 2025, and the company beat Wall Street’s estimates for earnings and revenue, sending shares up in after-market trading Wednesday.

    Remember, this is talking about profits, not revenue. They’re still making profit. They did shit profits, but it was more than people expected them to make, so shares went up. Fuck Tesla.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Investors had a general idea of what was going on at Tesla and thought their profits might be down to 20% of what they were last year, so prices went down before Tesla announced their results. Then the results came out. The results were terrible, but not as terrible as the rumours made it sound. So, share prices went back up a bit.

        That makes perfect sense. Stocks are like gambling, where a lot of the bets make sense. This is like the odds on a sports game being very long before an injury report is released, and the odds getting slightly better after the injury report is released and it’s not as bad as feared.

        Where TSLA stock makes absolutely no sense is the P/E ratio. That’s the price investors are paying for the shares compared to the earnings per share. An old, reliable company that probably won’t grow very much but that has reliably made a steady profit year after year might have a P/E ratio of 5. Tech stocks that might grow a lot in the future might have a P/E ratio of 20 because the expectation is that they have a lot of room to grow, and that in 5 years their revenues and profits might have tripled.

        For a typical car company that’s well run, a P/E ratio of about 5-10 is normal. Volkswagen is at about 8, Toyota is at about 10, Ford is at about 12.

        Tesla’s P/E ratio is currently 283.38, and its market cap is $1.386 trillion. So, Tesla investors somehow think that Tesla is going to grow to become hundreds of times its current size and/or massively profitable.

        So, the day-to-day movements of Tesla’s stock price make sense in the abstract. Investors assuming bad news sell shares, when the news isn’t as bad as feared, investors buy shares. Where they make no sense at all is that the investors are somehow deluding themselves into thinking this tiny car company is about to do something to juice its share price to the moon, like inventing nuclear fusion, or perfecting a time machine.

      • Ænima@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 hours ago

        It’s worse than gambling. When gambling there’s risk and reward, but bad bets are still the responsibility of the player just like bets that outperform. In stocks, if someone makes a bet and/or the company misses their expected returns, the gambler can sue the company. It’s the only gambling where oops, all losses can still result in payoff for the player by fiduciary class-action lawsuit.

        I played meme-stocks in 2020-21. I saw that bullshit first-hand, getting half a dozen emails after quarter misses about suing the company over their failure to meet projections. But half of those companies were just getting fucked with because of the influx of idiots like me doing silly shit with their money! I was blown away by that and suddenly started to see how fucked we were to do anything to stop the cancer that unregulated capitalism has become. Infinite growth, impossible in a finite system, is not only expected, but failure to return positive returns could be met with shareholders suing the company for line not go up high enough reasons.

        It’s so messed up.

        • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          This is the big thing. Tesla’s stock has never been valued based on what the company is or can do. It’s valued on musk’s image and how much value people believe that brings to the company.

          His huge pay packages are likely because he knows that there’s a reckoning coming with the stock, and he doesn’t want to be a bag holder for his own company.

          That’s one of the reasons why he lies constantly about what’s coming. Full self-driving, people on Mars, solar roof shingles. He has to keep pumping up the image, or the whole house of cards collapses.

          • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The problem is, there is seemingly no end to his bullshit that people will gleefully swallow. I bought it for a while, I loved the idea of an idyllic future. Unfortunately, one must deliver on that at some point. I was always willing to to accept the bullshit on the premise that it would happen at some point. However he’s lost the plot to his own hubris and idiocy. Yet somehow, he’s still able to con enough people to prop (and grow!) his meme stonk.

            • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Profits tanking by 46% Is it good indicator that he’s not immune to people waking up about reality.

              The entire thing is a house of cards that will likely collapse when public sentiment fully dissolves.

                • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  People are remarkably dumb, yes. But look at last year alone. European sales tanked. Domestic sales sucked. People were vandalizing and burning his vehicles on dealership properties. He was literally tearing up on the news because no one likes him.

                  He isn’t immune to company devaluation, and he knows how dangerous that is given how much is tied to his garbage stocks.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If the decline was expected, that had already affected the stock price. If you look ONLY at what happens on the day that expectation is finally official, in writing, then yes it’s counterintuitive. But it makes perfect sense that if a huge decline was already built into the price, then that price would rise a little when it’s found out that the decline wasn’t as bad as expected.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Another way of saying it is that shares had already gone down because this was expected. When it wasn’t quite as bad as expected, they got a little bump back.

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      A lot of people are too alienated from everything, or can’t make relationships between brands and what’s behind them, because everything not directly visible in front of us is too abstract for them, and there’s those who are like “all brands are terrible, it won’t make any difference anyway”. Well, and there’s the nazi sympathizers…

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I rode in a Tesla last week. Some of the tech is better than what I’ve experienced in other vehicles. To be fair, a lot of the controls are way worse and key functions are buried in screens and menus that are difficult to find.

      I’ll never own a Tesla, but I do hope the always on wireframe view of everything around you comes to other vehicles. It’s way easier to see pedestrians and cross traffic in a parking spot on that screen than it is the 360 camera view on our new Traverse which is only available in reverse and for a few seconds after shifting to forward.

    • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      “Profits”. It’s all just Three-card Monte but “legal” since the laws don’t apply to the rich.

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I totally agree. While I do have a Google account, I haven’t used it in many months, and my tablet and phones have never been signed in to begin with. I guess you might consider my mobile Android devices as ‘virgin’ devices, and I don’t mean Virgin Mobile.

      I did break my hiatus from Google briefly tonight, just to ask Google Docs to write a document to compare and contrast AI slop versus reality…

      https://lemmy.world/post/42327274

      Anyways, I’m done with Google again for as long as I can avoid it. But I’m still leaving the account active, if for no other reason than my YouTube videos (not like I’m even making any money off my random stuff)…

        • over_clox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yes, I’m running Linux Mint on my laptop, which comes with LibreOffice. If I needed to write any serious documents of my own, I’d definitely do so using LibreOffice.

          I dunno, I just wanted to test the waters of AI on itself in a way to see what it would spit out. At least what it wrote carries a reminder to not outright trust AI and do your own research and fact checking.