The skyrocketing cost of insurance premiums in Florida is leading residents to drop their insurance, consider selling their home, and even move out of the state, according to recent reports.

For years now, the sunny, vibrant state has been a magnetic destination for many Americans—a phenomenon which has been driving up demand for housing, especially during the pandemic, as well as home prices.

But while Florida was the number one state in the country that people moved to in 2022, it was also the one with the highest number of residents wanting to relocate, according to a SelfStorage.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a good thing their Republican Leaders are working hard to help them with this issue.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They were laughing at Californians when it was happening to us (very very recently) thinking that it was the result of “liberal policymaking”.

    Well, how does it feel, Florida? Are you ready to put aside our differences and go after our real common enemy, the for-profit insurance industry and climate deniers? Because I promise you, this is only going to get worse unless we force them to change things.

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        He probably does think that. He could spin rising premiums as speculation based on climate change belief.

        • limelight79@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Watch: More legislation on insurance prices in the state.

          Or, they could pull a North Carolina and outlaw any discussion of sea level rise.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Seriously, there are places where climate change (discussion) is banned? This is mind blowing

            We should just ban it everywhere, and that’s it, problem solved 🤦‍♂️

          • ____@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lord, don’t even get me started on NC property insurance. Their solution to increasing rates for many years was to mandate that rates couldn’t exceed x, based on what they believed was appropriate.

            Protip: It wasn’t appropriate. I’ve been out of that game for long enough now that I don’t know if they ever fixed it, but it was bad - basically if you couldn’t write a policy within x% of the expected rate, the risk had to be ceded to the state’s reinsurance facility, which drastically limited the available coverage.

          • flerp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            He can’t beat big business. If he tries it will ruin him even more than he is already ruined. Give him all the ideas.

      • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He will pass a new law allowing him to fire insurance companies’ boards and install his own people. Make America Florida! Yeehaw!

    • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Insurers aren’t really to blame here. Florida is a fundamentally high-risk place to build and live now, and will continue to get worse for the foreseeable future due to climate change. Even a non-profit insurer would need to price Florida insurance at a premium, lest its funds be exhausted when the inevitable category-6 hurricane hits the state.

      Arguably the ones most to blame (after the fossil fuel industry, for putting us in this position in the first place of course) is corrupt politicians and developers who allow such shoddy construction in the state in the first place.

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        We don’t just allow construction in risky places, we subsidize it. If you’re an owner or developer and you wanna put your own money at risk by building in risky places, you should be allowed to do that. Just don’t expect me to pay for it through taxes and FEMA flood insurance.

      • Blackhole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The category of hurricane isn’t the problem, it’s the frequency. 5 category 2s are way worse than 1 cat 4 or 5, in terms of economic cost, typically.

        • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was using cat6 as a stand-in for “all the bad stuff”. There’s never been a category 6 hurricane before.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe it’s not quite comparable to the situation in California, now that I think about it. Florida has always been in the path of devastating hurricanes for as long as I can remember. There is a degree of assumed risk living there. In California, these massive wildfires almost never happened and now suddenly it happens every year without fail no matter how hard we try to contain them. I live in an area that has never been hit by a wildfire, but because California as a whole has been hit so hard so many times recently, rates get raised to untenable levels and State Farm won’t even write you a policy. It’s completely mad.

        Like, I get it, it’s not the insurance company’s fault that we live in the path of predictable destruction, but there has to be a better solution than “move somewhere else if you don’t like it”. I wonder if we can learn something from studying the insurance models of other countries that are prone to disaster (Island nations in Asia that are frequently hit by typhoons, for example) and adapting that to how policies are tailored here?

    • willis936@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I’m on team insurance in these cases. The US is filthy rich and we have tons of highly habitable land. Why are we wasting resources subsidizing some people choosing to live in comfortable, risky locations?

      For those stuck in poverty: that does suck but I consider that an independent issue.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Free hand of the market is giving them an invisible bitchslap.

      Soon they’ll be “free” from insurance.

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good. Subsidizing risky behavior, as we do with some kinds of disaster insurance, encourages risky behavior. Rising insurance costs are the market telling people to stop living in certain places. We’d do well to listen and stop living in places like Florida so much.

    • superguy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you ready to put aside our differences and go after our real common enemy, the for-profit insurance industry and climate deniers?

      Nah. Republicans never admit when they are wrong.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sell their homes to who? Is this like a NFT, always a bigger fool, kind of thing?

    • quindraco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To landlords, who will charge arbitrarily high rent, secure in the knowledge that they aren’t in a free market due to inelasticity of demand (people can’t do without shelter) and supply (there are finite places to live). That will let them pay the insurance premiums homeowners can’t afford.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I keep trying to convince s few buddies we should pool our money together and get into RVs. Have a lot with RVs for rent. Move them from lot to lot based on needs. Park them outside business that don’t pay well but have a lot of workers.

        • quindraco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ve heard worse business proposals, for sure. But be careful about identifying as a landlord (even a prospective one) in a place like this!

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not actually going to own land and I am certainly not a lord. I am thinking more like I own RVs, rent them, and work with my renters to find provide parking and utilities.

            • quindraco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Landlords aren’t defined by literally owning land or literally being lords. If you own living space you rent out, you’re a landlord, even if your apartments are mobile (including both RVs and houseboats).

              But listen, I support you and your choices. This is not me being critical. We’re just having this conversation in a space where it’s much more in vogue to hate anyone who owns living space they rent out.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      Republicans who want to jerk off to DeSantis and let some racial slurs fly without social opprobrium.

      That’s who has been moving there since 2020 or so.

      • Vanon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some people see Florida as America’s floppy, deformed penis. Others see it more as a nauseating dookie emerging from the south. Scientists are still studying the area to find the causes of the mass psychosis, but urge all healthy adults to avoid the region and its inhabitants.

    • rchive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everything has a buyer at some price. These people will just have to sell at a loss, probably.

  • OhmsLawn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s interesting to me that insurance companies are becoming the chief drivers of the preparation for climate change: “Wanna build a house in the woods? On a sandbar? GTFO. Use your own money.”

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Since humans invented math and fossil fuels, this moment was inevitable. The writing has been on the wall in Florida for ten years.

      I forgot the actual statistics, but it’s something crazy. Like Florida constitutes 8% of the country’s homeowners insurance policies, but 80% of all homeowners insurance litigation. Florida real estate is a ponzi scheme now.

      They’ve got miles and miles and miles of roads in Florida lined with 10-million dollar, beachfront houses, all of which will sooner than later be buried under 25 ft of seaweed for the next thousand years. The question is who will be left holding the bag on all that risk?

      I’m certain the Republicans in the Florida legislature will let the insurance companies off of the hook before too long here, and will leave working people holding a bunch of worthless real estate, just waiting for climate catastrophe to wipe everything away.

    • zaphod@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well yeah. The cost of damage resulting from rising sea levels are one of the negative externalities that result from burning fossil fuels. Insurance premiums are effectively passing that cost on to future flood victims.

      That means the right market-based solution, which both parties claim to love, is to apply an appropriately sized carbon tax, thereby internalizing those costs in the price of fuel, and using the funds to pay for flood mitigation and future damage, but that looks too much like socialism…

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The criticisms I hear from the American left about carbon taxes is that they don’t work, not that they look like socialism. I think they probably would work, but what do I know.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because they are grounded in the real world. If your goal is to make money finding out how to lower your costs is a good way to do it. If your goal is to win elections telling people what they want to hear is a good way to do it. They know that this is happening and it is going to get worse.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whatever it takes to finally get people to realize that living in a disaster zone is a terrible idea.

    • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The current crisis isn’t so much about climate change as it is an insurance market so rampant with fraudulent roof damage claims that the market can’t bear it. FL legislature tried to correct this but before the law took effect a flood of claims were filed.

      Climate change will only make this worse, ofc.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My understanding is that the substantial majority of roof damage claims were legitimate and attributable to predatory roofing companies that would finance and install new roofs after a storm at a huge discount, they’d install a shitty fucked up roof, then would sell the debt to a third party servicer, and then the roofing company would close up shop, rebrand under a new name, and do it again. By the time the roof fails, the original company is long gone leaving the homeowner and the insurers holding the bag.

        The legislature and the insurers realized they had a impending consumer crisis and loosened the laws about paying these claims, and essentially opened the door to the fraud.

        I wonder if the real issue at this point is that Florida just attracts fraudsters. It was their laws that allowed contractors to have a revolving door of LLC’s.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    It won’t be long, and in Florida the cost for the mortgage will be neglectable in comparison to the costs of insurance.

    The big downside will be that Floridians will move out of Florida and spread elsewhere. Maybe it is time for Georgia and Alabama to invest in a massive fence?

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not being able to sell them (except for 10 cents on the dollar of what they paid) when they cannot be insured will be the next shock.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah we saw that happen in places like Detroit during the recession, but I doubt it’ll get quite that bad ($100 homes) since Florida at least has good weather going for it.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh come on. We live in a house built in the 1940s, and I moved to this house from one built in the 1920s that is still in good shape. It’s not like all the houses are knocked down and rebuilt every 15 years, but that is how the insurance is priced.

        Insurance is partly like gambling, the house always wins, right? They want to make money. Whatever the highest amount allowed by law is, that is what they charge.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Insurance typically works off historical data to evaluate risk from my understanding, and having something as disastrous as the Miami beach condo collapse bodes a bad sign for insurance companies, especially given the terrible and absolutely incompetent rescue effort during the aftermath.

    By the way, I’m shocked at how quickly the Miami condo collapse left the news cycle.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    lol @ all the people who fled the northeast because “Florida is cheap…”

    Even the second place finisher of the Carolinas has gotten too expensive.

  • Hypx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People move to Florida for the same reason why people use to move to California. So you wonder when housing prices will absolutely soar. Also, lack of natural disaster preparedness is something that can’t be ignored in Florida. Deregulation won’t solve that problem.

    • Rockyrikoko@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They didn’t finish the sentence

      …according to a SelfStorage service clerk working in Tampa /S

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So much for DeathSantis utopia. Go back to Florida and don’t bring your Nazi politics to my state.

    • DigitalTraveler42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      40% of voting Floridians voted against DeSantis, Florida is also the state with the third highest Jewish population, I’m fairly certain that nowhere near all of Florida has “Nazi” politics.

      Maybe try not sounding like an ignorant by generalizing the third most populated state, which is also just as mixed as the other three most populated states. You’re just sounding like those idiots that bitch about how California is all “liberal” while ignoring the conservative North Cali and all of the Neo-Con enclaves and Nazis in between.

      Sure the Florida GOP are pretty much Nazi-lite, but there’s a shitload of Florida citizens who are not them and completely disagree with them and are doing what they can to push back against them.

  • Clown_Tempura@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would be sick if we could pull a Looney Tunes and saw the fucking thing off from the rest of us. Let it float away and sink into the Atlantic.